Kontinuous Kardashian Krap

**arie_skop** · December 28th, 2018, 07:26 PM

Kris Jenner or probably worse. They all started PS at a young age and have relied on their looks to make money.

**tulip** · December 29th, 2018, 09:12 AM

I just can't imagine what all the surgery and fillers etc will look like after years of doing it. You see the older women who have done too much, but I don't know if we've seen women that started really young with the PS age. Is there anyone that comes to mind?

**manningmsj** · December 29th, 2018, 09:15 AM

^^^ Maybe Janice Dickinson? Not if she started early or late and just had horrible surgeons...

**Angeli** · December 29th, 2018, 09:34 PM

Originally Posted by manningmsj

^^^ Maybe Janice Dickinson? Not if she started early or late and just had horrible surgeons...

I think she's just had bad surgeons. We wouldn't necessarily notice anyone who's had good work done. Kris Kardashian has probably had a lot of work done. Except for her nose, she looks pretty good. Then there's Michael Jackson, who had a lot of bad work done.

**tulip** · December 29th, 2018, 10:13 PM

Originally Posted by Angeli

I think she's just had bad surgeons. We wouldn't necessarily notice anyone who's had good work done. Kris Kardashian has probably had a lot of work done. Except for her nose, she looks pretty good. Then there's Michael Jackson, who had a lot of bad work done.

But how early? These women are starting in their 20s if not before. Imagine 30-40 years of fillers, work done, etc -- and it's not just the quick nip and tuck, but nips, tucks, redesigns and injections galore.

**Angeli** · December 30th, 2018, 06:43 AM

Originally Posted by tulip

But how early? These women are starting in their 20s if not before. Imagine 30-40 years of fillers, work done, etc -- and it's not just the quick nip and tuck, but nips, tucks, redesigns and injections galore.

I guess we'll see with time who holds up well and who doesn't. Christie Brinkley has looked good for years, but her latest procedure has left her looking like someone else. Jane Fonda still looks good at 80. The Kardashians are probably the real test because they simply cannot leave their faces and bodies alone.

**holly** · December 30th, 2018, 07:12 PM

Thing is, with good work, you don’t notice it. The person just looks “refreshed”, not “done” , so we probably see plenty of people in real life who have had good work done, but we just don’t know it (unless they tell us)

**Daphodil** · December 30th, 2018, 07:39 PM

Originally Posted by holly

Thing is, with good work, you don’t notice it. The person just looks “refreshed”, not “done” , so we probably see plenty of people in real life who have had good work done, but we just don’t know it (unless they tell us)

I think for a long time Sandra Bullock and Jennifer Aniston fell into this category. Sandra for sure is starting to look a bit stretched.

**K-Piece** · December 31st, 2018, 01:29 PM

Originally Posted by Daphodil

I think for a long time Sandra Bullock and Jennifer Aniston fell into this category. Sandra for sure is starting to look a bit stretched.

Yes, good examples. And Aniston is starting to look, at times, kind of "puffy" & "over-filled". (But it's weird.--I'll see a set of candid photos that make me go "Her cosmetic work is finally starting to become obvious." But then the next time i see her, she'll look pretty much like her old self again.)

**Froogy** · January 2nd, 2019, 08:48 AM

https://people.com/parents/kim-karda...-fourth-child/

I can not get the article to post, sorry.

**SHELLEE** · January 2nd, 2019, 08:51 AM

So I wonder what this one is going to be named and if they are going for another girl to whore out.

**tulip** · January 2nd, 2019, 09:01 AM

At least they make cute kids. That's really all those little ones have going for them. They will be raised devoid of any shreds of decency, kindness or education. Little money making machines.

At some point, hopefully in the not too distant future, the Kardashian name won't mean giant dollar signs. What will this generation do? They are seriously being raised from the moment they are born into this life of privilege, having to do nothing but shill themselves and products, take a million selfies and wear ugly clothes. What is going to happen to them? I know that the family has millions, but I do wonder what will happen to them when the family becomes irrelevant.

**Lofty Bike** · January 2nd, 2019, 09:41 AM

So a new pregnancy is announced 11 months after Chicagos birth. That means that the gestational carrier had between 8 and 10 months between pregnancies and who knows how many attempts she went through. She is probably payed well, but still, this seems reckless towards her health. But why would the Kardashians care?

**witchcurlgirl** · January 2nd, 2019, 09:55 AM

Originally Posted by Lofty Bike

So a new pregnancy is announced 11 months after Chicagos birth. That means that the gestational carrier had between 8 and 10 months between pregnancies and who knows how many attempts she went through. She is probably payed well, but still, this seems reckless towards her health. But why would the Kardashians care?

I don't see that it's the same surrogate in the link

**czb** · January 2nd, 2019, 10:25 AM

it said they liked the original surrogate and would use her again. i took 'would' to mean inclined, not necessarily that they are using the same one. so basically they (people) doesn't know.

stay tuned to a Very Special KuWtK to find out!