Kontinuous Kardashian Krap

**idunno** · May 29th, 2016, 03:51 PM

Originally Posted by happy8

I read on TMZ that BC/Rob have negotiated a 7 figure deal for the first baby pics. Gross! I sure hope he does a DNA test.

He's not doing a dna test. The photos will only be worth a couple of hundred bucks, if the kid isn't his. Daddy needs to get paid.

FWIW I don't believe for a second the he got more than a 5 figure deal (still way too much). Angelina Jolie got a 7 figure deal. It's just the Kartrashian pr machine in motion.

**Kittylady** · May 31st, 2016, 03:47 AM

Originally Posted by idunno

He's not doing a dna test. The photos will only be worth a couple of hundred bucks, if the kid isn't his. Daddy needs to get paid.

In true Kartrashian style they'll do the shoot, get paid and THEN have the DNA test. If the kid is his, fair enough, if it isn't then they can go for another cover detailing Rob's devastation about it all. That's the Kartrashian way.

**Bombshell** · May 31st, 2016, 02:09 PM

Originally Posted by Kittylady

In true Kartrashian style they'll do the shoot, get paid and THEN have the DNA test. If the kid is his, fair enough, if it isn't then they can go for another cover detailing Rob's devastation about it all. That's the Kartrashian way.

Exactly. If the test shows it isn't his, that story will be sold for top dollar.

**tulip** · June 1st, 2016, 02:56 PM

I just read that Rob and Blac Chyna are getting their own reality show. Ugh. E! should just rename itself the Kardashian network.

I'm sure we'll be treated to the baby, the wedding, and Rob's weight loss as story lines. Again, I don't think there is one authentic thing about this family. This "relationship" was nothing more than a stepping stone to more air-time.

**twitchy2.0** · June 1st, 2016, 06:49 PM

Originally Posted by tulip

E! should just rename itself the Kardashian network.

K!

**SHELLEE** · June 1st, 2016, 10:57 PM

Kuntrashian network.

**BelledeJour** · June 2nd, 2016, 02:21 PM

There is a new photoshoot coming:

**rollo** · June 2nd, 2016, 02:24 PM

Oh please. Maybe she can take her skin off like that Robbie Williams video.

**dexter7** · June 2nd, 2016, 02:25 PM

such a secret..........involving secret parts of kim we know nothing of, like her tits and ass.

Oh, wait.

**ADel** · June 2nd, 2016, 03:06 PM

I can't with this one. We've seen it all already. Anything new from her will have to involve a speculum and stirrups.

**rollo** · June 2nd, 2016, 03:15 PM

Bette Midler reveals she named her chickens after the Kardashian sisters... but Kim died of a yeast infection

By DAILYMAIL.COM REPORTER
PUBLISHED: 18:36, 2 June 2016 | UPDATED: 19:12, 2 June 2016

She got into a now infamous Twitter feud with Kim Kardashian about a nude selfie the E! star posted in March.
But despite throwing some serious shade in her direction, Bette Midler seemingly has some affection for the Kardashian clan, at least enough to name her farm animals after them.
The 70-year-old actress revealed on Wednesday that she had a chicken called Kim Kardashian but it tragically died.

+4
Farming fanatic: Bette Midler has revealed she named some of her chickens after the Kardashian sisters, Kim, Khloe and Kourtney

Talking at the New York Restoration Project's Spring Picnic, Bette revealed that she keeps several chickens at her upstate New York home.
'We have the Kardashian sisters, actually, our chickens,' said Hocus Pocus star.
But she added she can no longer tell them apart after Kim's unfortunate passing and when they had to get some replacement poultry.
'Kim died of a yeast infection. We had to get some different ones.'

Read more: Bette Midler named some of her chickens after the Kardashians but Kim died of a yeast infection | Daily Mail Online

**ADel** · June 2nd, 2016, 03:17 PM

God how I love Bette!

**rollo** · June 5th, 2016, 10:35 AM

**Angeli** · June 5th, 2016, 02:47 PM

Why haven't we seen more baby pictures of her son? Is it possible that the one baby picture they released (the one that looked like North) actually WAS a picture of North? Why haven't they taken their son out in public in the six months since he was born? Why haven't they ever taken out out both of their children together at the same time? (Maybe they can't handle their own children without a nanny present?) It just seems like odd behavior.

**rollo** · June 5th, 2016, 03:00 PM

There is a 'blanket' pic where someone handed a baby seat with a blanket to Cim and she bravely staggered up the steps of her private plane in her high heeled boots with it (from the same set of pics I posted above.) However, the comments were (as with North) to the effect that a 6 month baby would have kicked the blanket off and it was an empty baby seat ...