^ I actually liked that article - it showed both sides of the argument.
What makes it a nice "rumor" is there are so many things about her that can be manipulated to support the idea, while there are just as many things you could say to also discredit the theory as just circumstance (like her name, her inability to have kids, etc.).
I like how the article points out that only so many people actually know the truth about it: Jamie, her doctors, and her parents... and NONE of them are talking. So while I think I'm pretty impartial - I think it's always something I'm going to question.
Bookmarks