Did Katie Holmes fake the NY Marathon and have someone else run it for her? - Page 29

funky_chicken · January 21st, 2008, 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cherrypye

^^Hey, so how Funky is your Chicken?

eh - no comment on that one

paternity test? let's send them to a talkshow.

cherrypye · January 21st, 2008, 06:07 AM

Maury would snap that up in a New York Minute!

Chilly Willy · January 21st, 2008, 06:17 AM

So glad that this is backfiring on her. All of it, I mean. I'm sure she thougt that she would have a Nicole Kidman style career with al the exposure she gets for being with Tom Cruizy.

funky_chicken · January 21st, 2008, 07:35 AM

I feel sorry for her ex. I mean, if it's really his baby, he would never ever find it out

Chilly Willy · January 21st, 2008, 07:41 AM

I'm sure Josh knows. I'm sure he signed a contract as well.

Novice · January 21st, 2008, 07:56 AM

Quote:

You shouldn't say that about us, and you can't say that about my child."

Very clever Katie, but not clever enough. We're not saying that she's not your child just that a) Tiny Thomb Thumb is not the daddy and
b) that she's older than you say she is.
I notice that she didn't address the Tom is her daddy topic....

Voodoo Child · January 21st, 2008, 07:58 AM

You know what? I admit these two and their whole Co$ are starting to freak me the hell out. First of all us non believers are considered to be a pack of uneducated suppressive glibs. (is that correct so far?)
We are obviously useless if someone is in an accident and we can't help them because you know they know we know that they are the only ones who cannnnnnnnnnnnnnnn.

So where does this leave us? I don't think his movies like War of The Worlds is any coincidence. I think they have a bigger picture in store for us like Total Extermination of the Cocky Insolent Frivolous Repressive Restrictive Glibs like us. We certainly can't help the drug problem (they have the edge on that) We can't help World Peace (they are the experts on that) So what the fuck is left I ask you?

Better start buiding that underground tunnel for us all and prayyyyyyyyy

aabbcc · January 21st, 2008, 09:54 AM

You shouldn't say that about us, and you can't say that about my child.

If she was talking about her and Tom [us], why didn't she say "our" child?

Mel1973 · January 21st, 2008, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stylejunkiex

Who's ganging up on who? And why was I not invited? I AM the most supremely intolerant cunt on here, you know...

why, you lying little biotch! I'm the least tolerant!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sojiita

Who cares about stupid OK Magazine's pronouncement. It provides NO relevant info and is USELESS AND MEANINGLESS. So they just decide to 'announce' that she told them ahead of time she would be running it, so that must make it so..that she did run it? FUCK THEM. Arrogant Assholes.

If they did, indeed know of her "intention" to run, where are there photogs? I mean, she gave them the scoop, didn't she? why no photos throughout the marathon???

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrsDark

I'm not only shorter than Katie, but no doubt outweigh her, but I bet I could run that marathon in less time than her.

ah, but the question is - are you wearing a bra or not??

is it just me that has this problem? When I run or exercise or something, my fingers swell so much that I can't wear any jewelry? Yet, she's wearing plenty of rings....

MrsDark · January 21st, 2008, 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mel1973

ah, but the question is - are you wearing a bra or not??

Hell yes. My girls aren't gonna look like flapjacks!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mel1973

is it just me that has this problem? When I run or exercise or something, my fingers swell so much that I can't wear any jewelry? Yet, she's wearing plenty of rings....

When I was pregnant and working out this sometimes happened. But I can't say that I have noticed it other times. But pretty much the only jewelry I wear when working out is my wedding ring, which is definitely not the humongous rock a celeb would probably be sporting.

Sojiita · January 21st, 2008, 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Novice

I posted it because I thought that the CO$ PR people had been here... seeing as we're up to 400 posts on this subject... and had swung in to action.... which I thought was worth noting.... and creepy!

Crackho was right...I was blasting them, not you. and of course you should have posted it. THE STORY itself was very relevant and was good for a scornful laugh at OK magazine!

Novice · January 21st, 2008, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sojiita

Crackho was right...I was blasting them, not you. and of course you should have posted it. THE STORY itself was very relevant and was good for a scornful laugh at OK magazine!

We're coolio Soj - I just thought I might not have been clear why I posted it, and was trying to clarify a bit. I totally accept that it might have been perceived as aggressive, however it wasn't intended to be.

buttmunch · January 21st, 2008, 02:42 PM

Quote:

I'm sure she DID give birth - but not in April. That kid is older than 22 months. I'll bet the farm on it.

Spot on. I mean, the woman had the gestation period of an elephant, not a human.

lily j · January 22nd, 2008, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoraKnows

Stupid keyboard. Now I have to start from scratch! ...As I was saying: I've done an EMBARRASSING amount of research into this, and I don't beleive for a theta-second that Katie ran and/or walk) that whole marathon. I can't point to one single reason -- it's a combination of MANY odd/suspicious circumstances (some stranger than others) that have me totally convinced. They include (in no particular order):

1) Runners are given timing "chips" to wear on their shoelaces. NO chip can be seen on Katie's shoes (or anywhere else) in ANY of the photographs.

2) Katie was obviously running with two "bodyguards" (BG) wearing bibs #28994 and #6074. In photos, both BGs are clearly seen wearing CHIPS on their shoes -- even as they cross the finish line! Yet in the official race results, #6074 is NOWHERE to be found! The man was CLEARLY wearing the chip as he crossed the finish line, yet NO time is registered for him?! Very, VERY odd.

...It's also interesting to note that he crossed the finish line right next to Katie, and just behind BG #28994, whose official time 5:13:37, compared to "Katie's" time of 5:13:38 -- just 1 second ahead of Katie.

4) Katie's pants. I don't care if you would/wouldn't wear pants to run 26 miles - that's not the point. The POINT is that those pants "conveniently" covered the laces of her shoes - in EVERY photograph. Just a coincidence, I'm sure.

These are interesting points. It's hard to imagine them having nearly identical times at every checkpoint, even if they were running very close to each other. If she was even a step behind it would have probably thrown their times off by a second, but instead they're only separated by mere tenths of a second, while at some points their times are identical down to each one-hundredth of a second (identical times at the 10K, 15K, the halfway mark, the 30K and the 35K checkpoints).

It's also odd that Paul Vincent has no recorded time at the 25K checkpoint.

Bellatheball · January 22nd, 2008, 02:10 PM

^^ Totally and completely agree with that point. I've run parts of races with others and our times never match up this perfectly. One is always off by a second or two. I say one dude was wearing both chips.