September 27th, 2007, 01:26 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In search of non disfigurated fatherwood
Posts: 7,075
|
Damn this one bothers me. I usually side on the side of art when it comes to nudity. This shot crosses the line for me though. It wouldn't bother me if her legs were not open with the focal point being her crotch. I agree the girls were probably just playing around having fun but the photographer knew what she had captured. I would never allow a photo like this of my daughter to be out in public.
|
|
|
September 27th, 2007, 01:33 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between uncertainty and acceptance
Posts: 4,468
|
hmm yeah ok....that pic is maybe 'crop out the bottom half and pretend it never happened' thing. The pic itself is quite sweet and I remember dancing around with my sis in a similar careless way, but I'd be mortified if my parents had a picture of me like that little girl on the floor!! I can see why people are offended, and yes I can see why it is a controversial picture.
Quote:
|
OMG you are so right - I have a friend who is a lawyer and has two very young daughters. He told me he's terrified have a bath or a shower with them!
|
My own experience with this is with my (newly minted) husband-- My sister has had a little girl and bought one of these 'baby bucket' bath things. She was bathing her and I had a go and when she offered Hubster a go he said NO.
I asked him later why he was so anti, and he said he didn't want to hold someone else's naked baby because it'd feel 'wrong' and 'pervy'
Now as far as I know he's not a paedo, just one of the scores of guys that feel he is not allowed to interact with kids just in case he is wrongly labelled as a kiddie eating sicko. It is such a shame.
__________________
|
|
|
September 27th, 2007, 01:34 PM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 953
|
If I had've accidentally taken a shot of my daughter like that I would have destroyed it.
And taken a less intrusive shot that didn't invade her privacy like this does.
A different angle or position of the photographer could've made quite a cute picture. This instead is disturbing and too intrusive.
__________________
A dream you dream alone is only a dream...
A dream you dream together is reality. -Yoko Ono
|
|
|
September 27th, 2007, 01:36 PM
|
#34 (permalink)
|
|
Gold Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 719
|
^^^exactly.
it also leads me to believe that the photog exploited this in the name of "art", but it looks to me like he's just a perv who is irresponsibly putting "art" out there that is calling forth all sorts of people. it pains me to imaginehow many people go see this type of "art" so they can get off on it. and THAT, is what gives it porn status in my book.
|
|
|
September 27th, 2007, 02:20 PM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
|
Silver Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 432
|
Well, I'd love to click on the link and form an opinion, but won't for fear of the FBI banging down my door and arresting me for viewing child porn.
|
|
|
September 27th, 2007, 03:17 PM
|
#36 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: northwest mississippi
Posts: 5,518
|
I am one of the biggest haters of pedophiles there is, but it is a sad world when a man or woman is afraid to bathe with their own child or take a picture of their kids in the tub.
I don't know a damned thing about Elton John (other than he is a ridiculously talented man  ) but I wouldn't imagine that a gay man would need or want photos of little girls...
You have to be glad that someone is watching out for kids, but how far should that go?
|
|
|
September 27th, 2007, 03:27 PM
|
#37 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Playin' up in muh pussah
Posts: 3,836
|
Well, since I am home today I opened the picture, and while it just looks like taking a picture of kids goofing off to me, I personally don't see why anyone but immediate family would want such a picture. It is certainly not anything that I would want to hang in my living room. Just my opinion.
Hate to say it, but I was almost relieved that it wasn't two boys. I am really tired of the "gay, must be a pedophile" way of thinking.
|
|
|
September 27th, 2007, 05:00 PM
|
#38 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,992
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crackho
Hate to say it, but I was almost relieved that it wasn't two boys. I am really tired of the "gay, must be a pedophile" way of thinking.
|
I've never really correlated gay with pedophilia, and I haven't really heard it that much. Now with priests, that's a completely different story.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Celestial
I also choose to believe the rumors because I am, when it is all said and done, a dirty gossip.
|
|
|
|
September 27th, 2007, 05:58 PM
|
#39 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,221
|
Quote:
|
....features two young girls posing provocatively...
|
Wait, Elton can't be a perv here...... isn't he into guys, not girls. Right?
__________________
I think they're worried that if she stands up the kids will fall out. ~Serendipity
|
|
|
September 27th, 2007, 06:02 PM
|
#40 (permalink)
|
|
Hit By Ban Bus!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Everywhere and nowhere.
Posts: 9,459
|
Wait, he's gay and the pic is of two GIRLS?
I'm confused
|
|
|
September 27th, 2007, 06:03 PM
|
#41 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lost Angeles
Posts: 34,330
|
^ its art thats why.
LEAVE ELTON JOHN ALONE PLEASE! HE'S A HUMAN!!!!
__________________
MY VAG IS ENTRANCE ONLY! "I measure success by the degree to which I ruin other people's lives." -Gary Oldman  In any case as always: I BLAME BUSH!
|
|
|
September 27th, 2007, 06:16 PM
|
#42 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,221
|
I guess Elton can always blame the internet.
__________________
I think they're worried that if she stands up the kids will fall out. ~Serendipity
|
|
|
September 27th, 2007, 06:43 PM
|
#43 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Playin' up in muh pussah
Posts: 3,836
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lily
Wait, he's gay and the pic is of two GIRLS?
I'm confused

|
Many peds don't differentiate between boys and girls; they like children, not a particular sex.
|
|
|
September 27th, 2007, 07:06 PM
|
#44 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lost Angeles
Posts: 34,330
|
^ eewwww really?! disgusting!
__________________
MY VAG IS ENTRANCE ONLY! "I measure success by the degree to which I ruin other people's lives." -Gary Oldman  In any case as always: I BLAME BUSH!
|
|
|
September 27th, 2007, 07:14 PM
|
#45 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: almost heaven.... southeast, USA
Posts: 9,318
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoko Ono
If I had've accidentally taken a shot of my daughter like that I would have destroyed it.
And taken a less intrusive shot that didn't invade her privacy like this does.
A different angle or position of the photographer could've made quite a cute picture. This instead is disturbing and too intrusive.
|
Exactly! I have nude pics of my kids, but none with their genitalia showing. It's just not necessary.
Why someone would want to hang that in their living room is beyond me. And how is it art..... somebody was lying to that women when they told her she was an 'artist'. No telling how much that piece of trash sold for.
I swear, rich folks will buy anything!
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06 PM.
|