Go Back   Gossip Rocks Forum > Gossip and Discussion > Latest Gossip


Login to remove all ads!
Old September 27th, 2007, 01:26 PM   #31 (permalink)
sluce
Elite Member
 
sluce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In search of non disfigurated fatherwood
Posts: 7,075
Default

Damn this one bothers me. I usually side on the side of art when it comes to nudity. This shot crosses the line for me though. It wouldn't bother me if her legs were not open with the focal point being her crotch. I agree the girls were probably just playing around having fun but the photographer knew what she had captured. I would never allow a photo like this of my daughter to be out in public.
sluce is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2007, 01:33 PM   #32 (permalink)
Rondette
Elite Member
 
Rondette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between uncertainty and acceptance
Posts: 4,468
Send a message via MSN to Rondette Send a message via Yahoo to Rondette
Default

hmm yeah ok....that pic is maybe 'crop out the bottom half and pretend it never happened' thing. The pic itself is quite sweet and I remember dancing around with my sis in a similar careless way, but I'd be mortified if my parents had a picture of me like that little girl on the floor!! I can see why people are offended, and yes I can see why it is a controversial picture.

Quote:
OMG you are so right - I have a friend who is a lawyer and has two very young daughters. He told me he's terrified have a bath or a shower with them!
My own experience with this is with my (newly minted) husband-- My sister has had a little girl and bought one of these 'baby bucket' bath things. She was bathing her and I had a go and when she offered Hubster a go he said NO.

I asked him later why he was so anti, and he said he didn't want to hold someone else's naked baby because it'd feel 'wrong' and 'pervy'

Now as far as I know he's not a paedo, just one of the scores of guys that feel he is not allowed to interact with kids just in case he is wrongly labelled as a kiddie eating sicko. It is such a shame.
__________________
Rondette is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2007, 01:34 PM   #33 (permalink)
Yoko Ono
Gold Member
 
Yoko Ono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 953
Default

If I had've accidentally taken a shot of my daughter like that I would have destroyed it.
And taken a less intrusive shot that didn't invade her privacy like this does.
A different angle or position of the photographer could've made quite a cute picture. This instead is disturbing and too intrusive.
__________________
A dream you dream alone is only a dream...
A dream you dream together is reality.
-Yoko Ono
Yoko Ono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2007, 01:36 PM   #34 (permalink)
Mookie
Gold Member
 
Mookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 719
Default

^^^exactly.

it also leads me to believe that the photog exploited this in the name of "art", but it looks to me like he's just a perv who is irresponsibly putting "art" out there that is calling forth all sorts of people. it pains me to imaginehow many people go see this type of "art" so they can get off on it. and THAT, is what gives it porn status in my book.
Mookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2007, 02:20 PM   #35 (permalink)
queenb3577
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 432
Default

Well, I'd love to click on the link and form an opinion, but won't for fear of the FBI banging down my door and arresting me for viewing child porn.
queenb3577 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2007, 03:17 PM   #36 (permalink)
sweetrebel
Elite Member
 
sweetrebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: northwest mississippi
Posts: 5,518
Default

I am one of the biggest haters of pedophiles there is, but it is a sad world when a man or woman is afraid to bathe with their own child or take a picture of their kids in the tub.
I don't know a damned thing about Elton John (other than he is a ridiculously talented man) but I wouldn't imagine that a gay man would need or want photos of little girls...
You have to be glad that someone is watching out for kids, but how far should that go?
sweetrebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2007, 03:27 PM   #37 (permalink)
crackho
Elite Member
 
crackho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Playin' up in muh pussah
Posts: 3,836
Default

Well, since I am home today I opened the picture, and while it just looks like taking a picture of kids goofing off to me, I personally don't see why anyone but immediate family would want such a picture. It is certainly not anything that I would want to hang in my living room. Just my opinion.

Hate to say it, but I was almost relieved that it wasn't two boys. I am really tired of the "gay, must be a pedophile" way of thinking.
crackho is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2007, 05:00 PM   #38 (permalink)
Laxmobster
Elite Member
 
Laxmobster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crackho View Post
Hate to say it, but I was almost relieved that it wasn't two boys. I am really tired of the "gay, must be a pedophile" way of thinking.
I've never really correlated gay with pedophilia, and I haven't really heard it that much. Now with priests, that's a completely different story.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Celestial View Post
I also choose to believe the rumors because I am, when it is all said and done, a dirty gossip.
Laxmobster is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2007, 05:58 PM   #39 (permalink)
potato_chips
Elite Member
 
potato_chips's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,221
Default

Quote:
....features two young girls posing provocatively...
Wait, Elton can't be a perv here...... isn't he into guys, not girls. Right?
__________________
I think they're worried that if she stands up the kids will fall out. ~Serendipity
potato_chips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2007, 06:02 PM   #40 (permalink)
Lily
Hit By Ban Bus!
 
Lily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Everywhere and nowhere.
Posts: 9,459
Default

Wait, he's gay and the pic is of two GIRLS?

I'm confused

Lily is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2007, 06:03 PM   #41 (permalink)
AliceInWonderland
Elite Member
 
AliceInWonderland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lost Angeles
Posts: 34,330
Send a message via AIM to AliceInWonderland
Default

^ its art thats why.


LEAVE ELTON JOHN ALONE PLEASE! HE'S A HUMAN!!!!
__________________
MY VAG IS ENTRANCE ONLY!
"I measure success by the degree to which I ruin other people's lives." -Gary Oldman
In any case as always: I BLAME BUSH!
AliceInWonderland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2007, 06:16 PM   #42 (permalink)
potato_chips
Elite Member
 
potato_chips's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,221
Default

I guess Elton can always blame the internet.
__________________
I think they're worried that if she stands up the kids will fall out. ~Serendipity
potato_chips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2007, 06:43 PM   #43 (permalink)
crackho
Elite Member
 
crackho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Playin' up in muh pussah
Posts: 3,836
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lily View Post
Wait, he's gay and the pic is of two GIRLS?

I'm confused

Many peds don't differentiate between boys and girls; they like children, not a particular sex.
crackho is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2007, 07:06 PM   #44 (permalink)
AliceInWonderland
Elite Member
 
AliceInWonderland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lost Angeles
Posts: 34,330
Send a message via AIM to AliceInWonderland
Default

^ eewwww really?! disgusting!
__________________
MY VAG IS ENTRANCE ONLY!
"I measure success by the degree to which I ruin other people's lives." -Gary Oldman
In any case as always: I BLAME BUSH!
AliceInWonderland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 27th, 2007, 07:14 PM   #45 (permalink)
sweetness
Elite Member
 
sweetness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: almost heaven.... southeast, USA
Posts: 9,318
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoko Ono View Post
If I had've accidentally taken a shot of my daughter like that I would have destroyed it.
And taken a less intrusive shot that didn't invade her privacy like this does.
A different angle or position of the photographer could've made quite a cute picture. This instead is disturbing and too intrusive.
Exactly! I have nude pics of my kids, but none with their genitalia showing. It's just not necessary.

Why someone would want to hang that in their living room is beyond me. And how is it art..... somebody was lying to that women when they told her she was an 'artist'. No telling how much that piece of trash sold for.

I swear, rich folks will buy anything!
sweetness is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Don't like the sun? Suit yourself, Sir Elton John Honey Gossip Archive 5 August 18th, 2007 08:07 AM
Virtual child porn legal in Second Life buttmunch News 16 May 12th, 2007 08:01 AM
Court rules against man in child-porn at work case Grimmlok News 8 August 11th, 2006 09:12 AM
Alexander Keith's actor caught with child porn twitchy News 3 February 16th, 2006 10:36 PM
Elton John to marry in Windsor Lil Gossip Archive 0 December 6th, 2005 07:38 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
Design by JP33