Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 47
Like Tree222Likes

Thread: Celebrity photographer Terry Richardson is banned from working with major magazines

  1. #31
    Elite Member Mrs P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    7,459

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rollo View Post
    American Apparel has been in trouble for years.
    Gosh, can't remember the name, but there was a magazine back in like the late 90's that was very girl empowerment. They'd always have someone go undercover for an article. One person went undercover to work at American Apparel and the owner totally showed his sexist and sleazy side. One article a journalist went undercover to be a polygomous Mormon bride. Funny as fuck. I miss that magazine.

    Edit: Funny in regards to the cheesy very traditional Mormon photo she had to take with the curled bangs and blue frumpy dress.
    bootspaige likes this.

  2. #32
    Elite Member Moongirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Cal-i-for-nigh-ay!
    Posts
    8,010

    Default

    ^^Was it Jane, or something like that?
    Mrs P likes this.

  3. #33
    Elite Member pinkbunnyslippers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    3,950 miles from NYC
    Posts
    5,392

    Default

    I was thinking of Jane, too. But I never read it. I remember Sassy magazine was by Jane. Sigh, I miss that magazine.
    Mrs P and Annika like this.
    "Fashion is an art, but individuality is the key"

  4. #34
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    6,591

    Default

    There was a great article in Huffington Post this morning about Terry hiding his predatory behavior behind his art. He just skeeves me out.

    http://https://www.huffingtonpost.co...b0d14acdccafcb

    The Case Of Terry Richardson, And The Predatory Men Who Hide Behind ‘Art’
    Why freedom of expression shouldn’t come at the expense of women’s dignity and safety.
    By Priscilla Frank

    DAVID WOLFF - PATRICK VIA GETTY IMAGES
    2.8k
    Terry Richardson, a fashion photographer who has been accused of sexually assaulting multiple women over the last decade, was finally blacklisted by publishing company Condé Nast International, The Telegraph reported on Monday.

    Many domestic Condé titles like Vogue had reportedly stopped working with Richardson as far back as 2010, after rumors of his explicit behavior with models made industry rounds. In an email to HuffPost on Tuesday, a U.S. representative confirmed that “Condé Nast has nothing planned with Terry going forward. Sexual harassment of any kind is unacceptable and should not be tolerated.” Several other brands have since followed suit.

    The notorious artist, who goes by the nickname “Uncle Terry,” has shot everyone from Kim Kardashian to Miley Cyrus to Barack Obama. He also photographed model Charlotte Waters, allegedly ejaculating in her face after licking her naked body, as well as Jamie Peck, who said Richardson groped her breasts during a shoot and “strongly suggested” she give him a hand job.

    Richardson’s aesthetic has been described as “sleaze fashion.” His photos feature nudity, sexual innuendo and not-so-inventive uses of popsicles. The photographer, a wiry 52-year-old who’s often seen in thickly rimmed hipster glasses and flannel shirts, leans into his “pervy” reputation, projecting a certain male fantasy of a nerd-turned-horndog. In the artist’s words: “I was a shy kid, and now I’m this powerful guy with his boner, dominating all these girls.” Some of the artist’s mantras are far more unsettling, such as his now infamous 2007 quip, “It’s not who you know, it’s who you blow. I don’t have a hole in my jeans for nothing.” He’s described his artistic process as “people collaborating and exploring sexuality and taking pictures.” Waters described her experience working with Richardson as “disgusting,” leading her to feel “completely paralyzed and freaked out.”

    Richardson has long shrugged off accusations of sexual assault as prude misunderstandings of his divisive artistic methods, characterizing “such rumors” as a “disservice [...] to the spirit of artistic endeavor” in a blog that appeared on HuffPost’s contributor’s platform in 2014. Richardson’s representatives proffered a similar defense once again on Tuesday, releasing a statement to BuzzFeed News in response to a leaked email announcing Condé Nast’s decision to blacklist the photographer:

    Terry is disappointed to hear about this email especially because he has previously addressed these old stories. He is an artist who has been known for his sexually explicit work so many of his professional interactions with subjects were sexual and explicit in nature but all of the subjects of his work participated consensually.

    PATRICK KOVARIK VIA GETTY IMAGES
    Paul Gauguin’s “Te Nave Nave Fenua (The Delighful Land).”
    In the fashion and art worlds ― realms that have historically celebrated bohemian, subversive and amoral ideas ― reportedly predatory behavior like Richardson’s can get covered up by a veneer of glamorous transgression. Artists like Richardson are cast as renegade heroes, able to pierce through societal niceties and politically correctness to capture something raw and true. As Purple editor (and Richardson defender) Olivier Zahm claimed in an interview with The Cut, “You’re not exploited in front of an artist, you’re exploited when you have to work in a boring job.”

    Models (mostly female) have been posing in front of artists (mostly male) for years, their bodies readily available to painters, sculptors and photographers, amounting to a long and still under-examined record of imbalance. “One of the first things you do in art school is draw a naked young woman,” artist and writer Christen Clifford told HuffPost. “The young female body is always the object. You are literally taught that in art school.”

    Museums are lined with images of undressed, often passively posed women depicted by (mostly white) male artists. And intimacy is often accepted as part of their artistic process; Pablo Picasso famously said that for him, art and sexuality are the same. In Paul Gauguin’s case, this intimacy turned into abuse when the artist’s underage, Polynesian muses reportedly became his “sex slaves.” Today critics look back uneasily on Gauguin’s oeuvre, understanding the predatory behavior that accompanied his work. Still, that work is shown in museums, taught in schools and ultimately admired.

    In response to allegations of abusive behavior, men like Richardson often evoke the names of these erotic icons past, glossing over issues of non-consensual model-artist relations by pointing to the annals of art history in their defense. “Like Robert Mapplethorpe, Helmut Newton, and so many others before me, sexual imagery has always been a part of my photography,” Richardson has said. He makes no mention of whether Mapplethorpe or Newton used their positions as artists to exploit their subjects in the process of making these sexual images. Of course, the “but I’m an artist!” defense fails to acknowledge the connection between the transgressive ideas artists cherish and the potentially damaging behavior involved in bringing those ideas to life.


    ANDREW BURTON VIA GETTY IMAGES
    Emma Sulkowicz carries a mattress, with the help of three strangers who met her moments before, in protest of the university’s lack of action after she reported being raped during her sophomore year at Columbia.
    Subscribe to The Morning Email.
    Wake up to the day's most important news.


    Today, that connection is still blurry. Free expression, the ultimate prerequisite for artistic creation, not only permits contemporary artists to act without inhibitions but rewards risks and transgressions. When that permission and those rewards are granted mostly to men in powerful positions, unbridled freedom can come at the expense of the less powerful ― including women. “It’s kind of like the way the term free speech has been appropriated by the alt-right to legitimize violence,” performance artist Emma Sulkowicz told HuffPost. “Sure, it’s freedom [of expression]. But freedom for whom?”

    Sulkowicz is best known for her performance “Mattress Performance (Carry That Weight),” in which she carried a 50-pound dorm mattress everywhere she went on Columbia University’s campus to protest the college’s mishandling of her rape. While at Columbia, she also curated a fictional exhibition comprised entirely of male artists accused of sexual assault. “I wanted to show films by Woody Allen and Roman Polanski and work by Terry Richardson,” she recalled.

    There’s a marked difference between abusing a woman’s body and exploiting her image. However, for Clifford, who moderated a discussion titled “Art and Sex” at an all-women’s gallery in New York in October, the night before we spoke, the two acts are hardly unrelated. “The idea that a man can take a woman’s sexy Instagram photos and put them out as his own work is very related to rape culture,” she said. “It’s the belief that a man has ownership over women’s bodies.”

    Clifford referenced contemporary artist Richard Prince who, in 2014, took screenshots of Instagram photos showing a variety of 20-something models, artists and social media stars in sexually suggestive poses and printed them onto canvases, which he then sold for up to $100,000. The women, who are not only featured in the images but often shot the original photos themselves, received no compensation ― nor did they give Prince permission to appropriate their work.

    Critic Jerry Saltz called Prince’s move “genius trolling,” and praised the artist as “a real wizard of his tastes; as honed to his needs as Humbert Humbert was to where Lolita was in the house.” Artist Audrey Wollen, whose photo was featured in the series, was not quite so moved. “An old, white, successful, straight male artist feeling entitled to the image of a young female body is not surprising,” she told i-D. “Maybe I’m idealistic, but I don’t think art should simply reiterate the status quo.”


    LEAH SCHRAGER
    “Infinity Selfie or SFSM (Safe for Social Media)” by Leah Schrager.
    For artist Leah Schrager, art history is largely the story of male artists like Prince and Richardson profiting off female sexuality. “Sexual women are stripped of their power unless their sexuality is bestowed upon them through the hands of a man,” she told HuffPost. “Those may be the hands of Richard Prince, Ryder Ripps or Harvey Weinstein. Women must be handed on a platter to the masses through the hands of men.”

    Schrager previously worked as a model but now prefers self-portraiture, creating sexy images over which she has full economic and creative autonomy. But she says she still has trouble being taken seriously as a self-described “sexy woman in the art world.” Along with being condescended to and overlooked by men in the industry, she recalled multiple instances of being groped and verbally harassed. On one occasion, which she described as “the worst,” she says an unnamed gallery director sexually assaulted her.

    “A very well-known art dealer called me on the phone,” Schrager said. “He proceeded to tell me that my selfies were embarrassing and that I was making a fool out of myself with my art. At the same time, while he was talking, it was very clear he was masturbating and coming to my pictures.” (Schrager also shared a story of being groped by a woman in her field.)

    Since an alarming number of women have come forward accusing movie producer Weinstein of harassment and abuse earlier this month, women in fields outside of Hollywood have followed, shedding light on the confounding pervasiveness of predatory behavior in nearly every industry. There were allegations lodged against Amazon Studios programming chief Roy Price and director James Toback, as well as magician David Blaine, Vox media director Lockhart Steele and ArtForum publisher Knight Landesman.

    Sulkowicz shared her hope that, following the Weinstein reports and subsequent backlash, predatory men in every field would finally be recognized for what they are. “With Harvey Weinstein, we are literally seeing a change in the way we use the English language,” Sulkowicz said, citing the ideas of theorist Stuart Hall. “We have a new term, and that term is Harvey Weinstein. We can now say: ‘he is a Harvey Weinstein,’ as in a man who has a powerful role in an industry and takes advantage of it to have his way with women. Once something has entered into the popular consciousness in that way, it demarcates a huge shift.”

    But for Schrager, a related problem still plagues the art world, and that’s a widespread fear of female sexuality on its own terms.

    “The art world either supports asexual images of women or sexual images of women authored by men,” she said. “I think the saddest thing that could happen from all this is women being pushed to be more asexual, more hidden, more nun-like. I think that’s moving backwards. The other option, truly the only real option, is for women to own their sexuality and get power from it. If women could be respected for presenting their own images, that would be revolutionary.”

    Richardson’s allegations have been public for years, long before stories of Weinstein’s behavior prompted powerful institutions everywhere to reevaluate the powerful men that run them. Today, women in the art world are not only calling foul on the “but I’m an artist” dodge, but pointing a finger at an imbalance of power that makes it difficult to suss out where creative direction ends and coercion begins. Beyond Richardson’s behavior, criticism lands on an art world that demands female sexuality be manufactured and sanctioned by men ― a world that shirks away from giving women the power to control their image.

  5. #35
    Elite Member rollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    41,161

    Default

    "I don’t have a hole in my jeans for nothing.”


    ​This comment reminds me about the sordid facts of the Yorkshire Ripper case. He doesn't even know how disgusting he is.
    I have some famous friends and I have mostly not famous friends.

  6. #36
    eva
    eva is offline
    Silver Member eva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    457

    Default

    It was called Bust
    Insert witty line here

  7. #37
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,857

    Default

    Creep. Hope they throw the book at him.
    Terry Richardson sex assault claims under investigation by NYPD - NY Daily News

    Terry Richardson under investigation by NYPD after models accuse him of sex assault


    Photographer Terry Richardson is the focus of a new investigation by the NYPD's Special Victims Squad, the Daily News has learned. Multiple women confirmed Tuesday that investigators from the elite unit have reached out in recent weeks, asking for sit-down meetings regarding the lurid lensman.
    The development follows a Dec. 15 cover story in The News detailing new allegations of sexual assault against the 52-year-old former fashion industry star who's shot everyone from Beyoncé and Miley Cyrus to President Obama.
    Ex-model Caron Bernstein stepped forward in the piece with claims Richardson invited her to collaborate on an edgy, topless photo shoot at his Manhattan studio in 2003 and ambushed her with a sex assault.


    Bernstein, 47, said Richardson exposed himself without warning, forced her to perform oral sex on him.


    She told The News a special victims detective called her last month and set up a meeting for this week.

    Former model Lindsay Jones confirmed she also received a similar call from a sex crimes detective. She plans to sit to be interviewed when she returns from an overseas trip, she said.
    Jones went public with a harrowing claim against Richardson in a Dec. 14 HuffPost piece.


    She retold the story to The News, claiming Richardson lured her to his studio in 2007 or 2008 with the promise of discussing a possible shoot over coffee.
    She said seconds after he closed the door behind her, he caught her off-guard with a demand she get on her knees. She said he exposed himself and started jabbing his penis in her face. She complied with his demands out of fear, she said.

    “I was afraid and confused and hoping to get it over with. I left there feeling like human garbage,” she told The News. “He thought I was disposable.”
    A representative with Model Alliance further confirmed Tuesday that the advocacy group was contacted by police and is participating in an investigation.


    A detective involved in the Richardson probe did not respond to a request for comment. An NYPD spokesman did not return a request for comment.
    Richardson has consistently argued all his sexual interactions with models were consensual.
    He vehemently denied assaulting Bernstein in a statement issued by his lawyer.
    His attorney, Brad D. Rose, previously showed The News a series of photographs shot by Richardson that depicted semen on Bernstein's breasts. The images did not show her face.


    “Ms. Bernstein knowingly and willingly posed for these photographs and at all times prior to and during the shoot, any contact she had with Mr. Richardson was consensual,” Rose told The News.
    Bernstein called it “ludicrous” to suggest she willingly agreed to perform oral sex on Richardson.
    “I didn't know this man from Adam. I would never walk in somewhere and agree to a sex act with a stranger. I've never done that in my entire life. Never in a million years,” she told The News last month.

  8. #38
    Elite Member arie_skop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    8,328

    Default

    I am actually surprised this guy was allowed to work in the industry for that long. He was always a creep.

  9. #39
    Elite Member MsDark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Northwest MS/Memphis TN
    Posts
    26,544

    Default

    Another rapist who needs to get his comeuppance.
    My Posts Have Won Awards. Can Any Of You Claim The Same? -ur_next_ex

    "I don't have pet peeves. I have major psychotic fucking hatreds, okay". ~George Carlin

  10. #40
    Elite Member Mrs P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    7,459

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MsDark View Post
    Another rapist who needs to get his comeuppance.
    If only Serial Mom really did exist, Terry would be killed. I wonder what weapon she'd choose for him? Would have to be photography related. Damn, I need to watch that movie again.
    SHELLEE and crayzeehappee like this.

  11. #41
    Elite Member SHELLEE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Florida Keys
    Posts
    20,773

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mrs P View Post
    If only Serial Mom really did exist, Terry would be killed. I wonder what weapon she'd choose for him? Would have to be photography related. Damn, I need to watch that movie again.
    Such a great movie.
    Mrs P and crayzeehappee like this.
    See, Whores, we are good for something. Love, Florida
    #fingersinthebootyassbitch

  12. #42
    Elite Member Bombshell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    in Delusion
    Posts
    2,592

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mrs P View Post
    If only Serial Mom really did exist, Terry would be killed. I wonder what weapon she'd choose for him? Would have to be photography related. Damn, I need to watch that movie again.
    The prank calls...
    Mrs P and crayzeehappee like this.
    "Shopping tip: You can get shoes for a buck at the bowling alley."

  13. #43
    Elite Member SHELLEE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Florida Keys
    Posts
    20,773

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bombshell View Post
    The prank calls...
    "Is this the cocksucker residence?"
    "Isn't this 4215 pussy way?"
    "Zip code is 212 fuck you?"
    Mrs P, crayzeehappee and Bombshell like this.
    See, Whores, we are good for something. Love, Florida
    #fingersinthebootyassbitch

  14. #44
    Elite Member Kittylady's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Somewhere been 'General Confusion' and 'Total WTF?'
    Posts
    18,688

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arie_skop View Post
    I am actually surprised this guy was allowed to work in the industry for that long. He was always a creep.
    Not only that but his work isn't anything special either, which makes me wonder what dirt 'Uncle Terry' has on someone else.
    Mrs P likes this.
    I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me. Hunter S Thompson

    How big would a T-Rex wang be?! - Karistiona


  15. #45
    Elite Member gas_chick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    39,802

    Default

    And no one was surprised. This guy can't hide the creepiness.
    I am going to come and burn the fucking house down... but you will blow me first."

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 54
    Last Post: June 2nd, 2016, 02:03 AM
  2. Replies: 125
    Last Post: July 12th, 2014, 01:12 PM
  3. Replies: 24
    Last Post: May 28th, 2014, 11:20 PM
  4. Paris Hilton Poses For Terry Richardson
    By Honey in forum Magazines and Photoshoots
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: October 23rd, 2013, 10:25 PM
  5. The perverted Terry Richardson (NSFW for sure!)
    By DAP in forum Just Plain Scary
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: December 26th, 2012, 06:07 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •