February 13th, 2008, 03:04 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Den of the roving cunty bitches
Posts: 24,535
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhateverLolaWants
Okay, for the time period, she has the perfect body shape. The Gibson girl type figure and even the flappers who followed were all classic pear shapes(Look at Agnes Ayres, for example) Also, love the melodramatics on stage...very Theda Bara
I mean, seriously...the whole idea of sexuality was completely different then.
Theda Bara in 1917 as 'Cleopatra'
 |
You know, you are right. I didn't even think about that.
|
|
|
|
February 13th, 2008, 03:12 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: If I was up your ass you'd know where I am!
Posts: 6,615
|
^^^I agree, she has a point. Women weren't exactly sculpted and buff back then.
|
|
|
|
|
February 13th, 2008, 03:21 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,191
|
Catherine Zeta Jones has the typical woman's body. She's pretty average, not fake looking like Pam Anderson or Victoria Beckham. Catherine's not heavy, not overly buff and for being 38 years old and giving birth to 2 kids, she looks damn good.
|
|
|
|
|
February 13th, 2008, 03:31 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Hit By Ban Bus!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: in the wild blue yonder
Posts: 15,485
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissDecember
Her body looks better than usual (photoshop?), but she still looks too matronly around the waist and hips, and saggy in the chest, to portray a belly dancer. She's one of those women who has a spectacular face and so-so body.
|
Most belly dancers I've seen have been quite matronly and certainly not as slim as CJZ. Zeta-Jones looks pretty good for any age, IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
February 13th, 2008, 03:36 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sea of Tranquility
Posts: 5,140
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrettyGirl
Catherine Zeta Jones has the typical woman's body. She's pretty average, not fake looking like Pam Anderson or Victoria Beckham. Catherine's not heavy, not overly buff and for being 38 years old and giving birth to 2 kids, she looks damn good.
|
More like 45, according to what some are saying.  Of course smoking, drinking, and Michael Douglas' creepy embraces are bound to age a gal beyond her years.
|
|
|
|
|
February 13th, 2008, 04:51 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,358
|
I would much rather look at her body, then Jessica Alba's in a role like this.
I think she has a great body for whatever her age is. Plus it's natural, not everyone can spend half a day working out just to be completely solid. I like some softness.
|
|
|
|
February 13th, 2008, 10:40 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Over the hills and far away
Posts: 17,944
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beeyotch
I spy deal-breakers!!
|
God, you're not kidding. Those things look like sausages with Lee press-on nails.
Glad to see she didnt get all rexy for the role. I stil say she was at her peak during 'Chicago'.
And she ain't 38. At least 5 years older.
__________________
And who knows which is which and who is who.
Up and down.
But in the end it's only round and round.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58 PM.
|
