Britney Spears losing her kids tomorrow in court?

[VenusInFauxFurs]

Really, what can you say to something like this. May the best parent win?

[pacific breeze]

^^True. Two irresponsible wrecks having kids = nannies + parents.

[Hugh_Jass]

the only thing that could make this situation worse is if those kids were ugly. thank god they're cute!

[carrie2008]

Britney and Kevin are not exactly parents to rave about that's for sure.

But Honestly, I wouldn't be placing custody of Sean and JJ to either of them. Britney really needs to clean up her act before anyone could take her seriously as a mother, if that's what she is so concerned about being as she claims. And Kevin isn't a shining star either, I'm sure.

It just comes down to the fact the poor kids have had to go through so much with all this constant and continuous chaos. It's sad and yet ridiculous. And to think they are both just 1 and 2 years old.

[Cali]

Because I'm bored and its Sunday, I was reading the Comments on Perez's posting of this story, and came across an interesting entry to share:

# 129 - To: Anyone claiming that Britney Spears is a bad mother. says – reply to this

(PLEASE READ THIS ENTIRE THING BEFORE RESPONDING)
Although Britney Spears is not the “ideal” mother, the enraged outbursts of so many claiming she is unfit for custodial rights of her two children are based on nothing more than counterfeit hearsay, endless tabloid reports, ignorance for what actual child abuse is, and laxity to recognize the millions of children in our society that suffer actual abuse and negligence and remain with their abusive parents in unfit environments, not even in question of being taken away. The fact that so many of you are so ignorant to actual fact and what child abuse really is appalls me. Putting soda into a child’s cup or baby bottle, trying to whiten your children’s teeth artificially, leaving your child with a nanny (who is most likely a superior candidate in comparison for adequately meeting the children’s needs; considering the qualifications someone with money takes into consideration when hiring five or more figure salaries to attend to their children), even dressing in provocative clothing, is nothing, NOTHING, is comparison to what I see on a daily basis.
CONTINUED IN NEXT POST…
CONTINUTED…
And yes, my occupation sees many heartbreaking cases, all of which Britney Spears “maltreatment” of her children come nowhere in comparison. The ONLY forms of abuse she could possibly be subjecting those children to (under the guidelines of the 2007 Child Welfare State Statutes Series Information Documents, which include Physical Abuse, Neglect, Sexual Abuse/ Exploitation, Emotional Abuse, Parental Substance Abuse, and Abandonment) are simply put, both given with no merit or accreditation as they are both spawned from tabloids and blog sites, targeting her as a monster and/or a mockery for her care-free lifestyle and recent unfortunate poor choices as an individual, as a marketing ploy to sell more magazines or acquire more “hits” on their web sites. Having colleagues that are working closely with the custodial rights procedures of Britney Spears; I can confidently say that evidence of two forms of abuse she is trying to be held accountable for (Emotional and Parental Substance Abuse) there is no sincere evidence in the extremity of anything that would take a child away from their biological mother.

CONTINUED… Those boys are under proper supervision; even when “mommy” and “daddy” are not around, they are clothed and fed adequately, not suffering from malnutrition or improper healthcare, they are not being sexually, physically, or emotionally abused, or exposed to any sort of drug use or paraphernalia, they are not in harm of any parental drug abuse by any legit proof or any testimony worth with standing, there has been no non-accidental physical injury to the children, there has been no injury to the psychological capacity of these children as evidenced by an observable or substantial change in behavior, emotional response, or cognition (contrary to more anecdotes that one has been diagnosed with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome), there is no legitimacy behind any claims that people repetitively are making with no knowledge of fact.

and, "The point was and is that in all actuallity this case is already being heard and the testimony and evidence against her is nothing strong enough to take the children away from her or they would have been removed from her home already, I know the testimony that is being referred to and it will let you all down severley trust me."

Celebrity gossip juicy celebrity rumors Hollywood gossip blog from Perez Hilton » Blog Archive » Headline Of The Week Weak

(haha you know its a slow news day when you're doing this, but I do think thats a gem. Sounds like she knows what she's talking about.)

[MrsMarsters]

Well she obviously has some sort of problem, shouldn't they be taken away until it is under control?

[Dorahacky]

She's apparently not having her parental rights terminated, which is a whole different scenario than a custody overturn...if her kids are truly, in any way important to her, she still has time to turn this around, QUIT fucking up, QUIT flashing her ham-sandwich snatch, GET some legit, true-blue mental help, and actually have a chance at not only being a parent, but a self-satisfied human being.

[Beeyotch]

Sounds like that Perez commenter is a social worker. And true as it all may be, it just goes to show how horrible and irrefutable the abuse has to be for the system to do anything about it. I wouldn't say that makes Spears innocent of careless, horrible parenting. Just because those boys haven't been physically hurt yet doesn't mean the situation isn't ripe for it. Like everything else, they're saying nobody can do anything about it until it's practically too late.

[Lily]

I don't believe her children are important to her at all. Not at all.

[aabbcc]

Originally Posted by Lily

I don't believe her children are important to her at all. Not at all.

Ditto.

[Bijoux]

It's hard to tell with Brit. Sometimes I think she dosn't want those kids at all...maybe just waiting to lose them in court instead of giving up and getting more negative publicity.

But also if she does lose them. I really think homegirl is going to effing lose her mind!

[BoogsBun]

Originally Posted by Lily

I don't believe her children are important to her at all. Not at all.

I think she she adores the entire "Oh, poor Brit, she's a single mother with two kids under 3yo that was married to a gold-digging deadbeat", more than she adores her actual kids.

[southernbelle]

Britney is lazy, has poor hygiene, appears to be stupid, and occasionally makes mistakes such as dropping the kids or not buckling them in properly, but (unless this witness has a bombshell that we don't know about) I don't believe she's done anything so severe that it would warrant termination of her parental rights.

Even when she's not with the kids, I'm sure they have a nanny. The kids are supervised, clothed, and fed- even though it might not necessarily be by Britney. While she may not want the kids, I think she recognizes that losing them would be terrible press. She has virtually unlimited resources and lots of power, and I think that if she did find herself in that situation, she would fight back HARD and dirty- those kids are not going anywhere.

[sharon_b]

From x17online.com

Former Britney bodyguard Tony, is the 'secret witness' who says he's got damning evidence about Britney for the custody case. Tony was fired by Britney around the time of concert at the House of Blues in Orlando. We spotted him with her at Millennium Dance Studio in April.

An X17 source tells us this guy never saw Britney do anything wrong or neglectful with her kids and that he wasn't even really allowed to be around Britney and the kids. Our source calls him "an angry guy" who "talked shit about everyone" and who was "lazy, a liar, and nosey."

More details coming ...

[Mira]

Originally Posted by southernbelle

Britney is lazy, has poor hygiene, appears to be stupid, and occasionally makes mistakes such as dropping the kids or not buckling them in properly, but (unless this witness has a bombshell that we don't know about) I don't believe she's done anything so severe that it would warrant termination of her parental rights.

Even when she's not with the kids, I'm sure they have a nanny. The kids are supervised, clothed, and fed- even though it might not necessarily be by Britney. While she may not want the kids, I think she recognizes that losing them would be terrible press. She has virtually unlimited resources and lots of power, and I think that if she did find herself in that situation, she would fight back HARD and dirty- those kids are not going anywhere.

Yes, Britney is the type of young woman who can be nice to her children and even make them feel loved, but their clothing, bathing and eating is probably done 95% by other people. There are a lot of women like Britney. They can't handle the daily stuff AT ALL.

Dirty clothes, screaming, babbling, poop, pee, diapers, spitting food across the room, all the stuff that infants and toddlers do. Britney won't even remember her sons' infancy and toddlerhood, that is, if she manages to stay alive.