LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksGood on Brangelina - they do good things.
Good on Brangelina - they do good things.
My choices are Brangelina and...Heidi and Spencer? I'll take neither. They're JUST as bad as Heidi and Spencer, possibly worse, because they use the misfortune of others to gain publicity and adoration.Originally Posted by TonjaLasagna
Wrong thread
ditto and I should just stop there
viggofan because some people have ranted on them for so long it's become a habit---- right Jersey?
^^ yes as could be said for many high profile celebs.
YOU CAN'T ALWAYS GET WHAT YOU WANT
(M. Jagger/K. Richards)
TIME has lost a lot of credibility. What makes Brad and Angelina INFLUENTIAL? What have they accomplished to help refugees and the poor in Africa? Absolutely nothing.
They don't all talk about it. Paul Newman has donated hundreds of millions to charity from all his food items.
^That's because Paul Newman is a truly decent and good person who actually cares about people. Brangelina cares only about Brangelina.
No argument from me, agree
Imo, it's people like Paul Newman who should be on that list, along with all the people who work fervently to find cures for diseases, come up with new medical technology, try to find alternative means to food growth, etc. They're the real heroes.
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
Nobody knows if B/A do these things JUST for good press, but even if its part of it. How can anyone Deny that they have Done some things great? Like taking in and adopting and loving Zahara, who had she NOT been rescued would have starved to death.
Brangelina don't show up for every red carpet event. They are not seen tanning most of there day away, they are seen in country's that NEED help. Providing some type of solace. Bringing ATTENTION there.
The only criticism that I agree with is that they NEED to be more stable. And they don't need anymore kids after this one pops out. They will have 5 kids under 10 and that's hard work regardless if they have nannies.
How many times in the beginning of there relationship were they spotted HELPING in some other country where the paps CHOSE to chase after them, just so they can get the first photos of them being a couple after Brad dumped Jenn?
It had been reported long before their affair, that AJ gave away 1/3rd of her income to the needy, again even if part of its for press, there isn't no other celebs doing that, we here them moaning about paychecks (more money then all of us will see in a lifetime) demanding back in profits of movies. Or whining how they became "accustomed" to a certain lifestyle and needs to continue to live in it, even though they could do just fine.
Here are some examples
Heather Mills. 48 million is NOT enough.
Nicole Kidman (who dosent seem to show or care about getting her two kids, wanted the SAME life she lived with Tom after the divorce)
Shaq's wife. The money she stole from him, him paying child support and so on is not enough. She wants to live in the same fancy surroundings or she feels deprived.
Denise Richards. Nothing needs to be added here.
These women married someone more famous and rich. Even though they should been satisfied that they got enough cash to wipe there asses with. There not. Now that is disgusting!
They're all garbage. What's worse with Brangelina is they exploit their kids and those less fortunate so that people worship them. That's as bad--if not worse--than just being a selfish moneygrubbing cow.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks