I'm sorry, but I don't see where it looks that much better. Maybe somewhat cleaner than usual...
Brit Brit Gets Her Weave Cleaned For Vogue
![]()
The "Brit Brit is A-OK" train is rolling along! Photographer Patrick Demarchelier took a few pictures of Brit Brit yesterday for Vogue. Yes, THAT Vogue. I'm really hoping the pictures are for Vogue's "Ode to Cheeto" issue.
This is one of the first times, in a long time, that I haven't gone cross-eyed from looking at Brit's weave. It usually looks like a tangled up ball of greasy yarn. It probably took an industrial-sized fan, two hot plates and a garden rake to straighten that shit out. Their efforts paid off, but you know by the time she got home, it was back to looking like a big bowl of coleslaw.
In other Cheeto news, Brit Brit told OK! Magazine that she already has a new album coming out this December. She said, “It’s my best work ever." Better than "E-Mail My Heart"? I doubt it.
Brit Brit Gets Her Weave Cleaned For Vogue | Dlisted
eat a hot bowl of dicks.
I'm sorry, but I don't see where it looks that much better. Maybe somewhat cleaner than usual...
Don't fear the reefer..
It looks clean and styled. Far better than when she's left to her own devices.
But I still say those extensions are horrible. It's been since what, Feb 2007 that she shaved her head. Couldn't the extensions be more strategically placed and layered so it's not as obvious? As it is, it's awful and so mushroom-y: it's her real short hair up top with the obviously fake long hair right underneath.
Well *I* think it looks nice, and I'm not exactly a fan.
----------------------------
“Saruman believes it is only great power that can hold evil in check, but that is not what I have found. I found it is the small everyday deeds of ordinary folk that keep the darkness at bay. Small acts of kindness and love."
Vogue? As in haute couture Vogue? As in style bible Vogue?
Has Anna Wintour been hitting the crack pipe???
vaya con dios
my hair is exactly like that down to the color and length, except i dont have short chunks sticking out or bangs. so i like it. beats the pink wig lol.
Unless she's ruined her hair from years of abuse, taking drugs and whatever else that made her body unhealthy, I don't understand why a freaking 26 year old needs crap-ass extensions and can't just leave it alone and grow the shit out naturally? I mean, it's been what....a year and a half since she shaved it? Other than that freakness and a couple of times getting it cut a wee bit above her shoulders she's always worn it long anyway.
My Posts Have Won Awards. Can Any Of You Claim The Same? -ur_next_ex
"I don't have pet peeves. I have major psychotic fucking hatreds, okay". ~George Carlin
Reports of Britney Spears appearing on an upcoming issue of Vogue have been greatly exaggerated. In fact, it ain't happenin' at all!Source | E! Online
So what gives? Read on to find out how this rumor got started... The confusion began this morning when gossiper Liz Smith reported that "Vogue's celebrated Patrick Demarchelier has come to the U.S. from London to photograph Britney Spears."
Sure he shoots for Vogue, but Spears must be posing for another magazine, a source tells me.
Spears' first and only appearance on a Vogue cover was back in November 2001 for an issue dedicated to American fashion (it hit stands just weeks after Sept. 11). The issue was a flop, according to the source. Editor-in-chief Anna Wintour "will never put her on the cover again," the source says. "She's just not a Vogue kind of girl."
A rep for the magazine confirms there are no plans for Spears. "She is not appearing on or in Vogue," the rep said. No matter because Ms. Spears is still a hot commodity. And no doubt there are plenty of other editors doing backflips and more to get the comeback pop princess on their covers.
See ya on the newstand, Brit!
ohnotheydidnt: Britney Spears Is Not In Vogue
eat a hot bowl of dicks.
Britney Spears Is Not In Vogue - E! Online
Britney Spears Is Not In Vogue
Today 1:39 PM PDT
Frank Micelotta/Getty Images for MTV
Reports of Britney Spears appearing on an upcoming issue of Vogue have been greatly exaggerated.
In fact, it ain't happenin' at all!
So what gives? Read on to find out how this rumor got started...
The confusion began this morning when gossiper Liz Smith reported that "Vogue's celebrated Patrick Demarchelier has come to the U.S. from London to photograph Britney Spears."
Sure he shoots for Vogue, but Spears must be posing for another magazine, a source tells me.
Spears' first and only appearance on a Vogue cover was back in November 2001 for an issue dedicated to American fashion (it hit stands just weeks after Sept. 11). The issue was a flop, according to the source.
Editor-in-chief Anna Wintour "will never put her on the cover again," the source says. "She's just not a Vogue kind of girl."
A rep for the magazine confirms there are no plans for Spears. "She is not appearing on or in Vogue," the rep said.
No matter because Ms. Spears is still a hot commodity. And no doubt there are plenty of other editors doing backflips and more to get the comeback pop princess on their covers.
See ya on the newstand, Brit!
by Marc Malkin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use of this site signifies your acceptance of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
© 2008 E! Entertainment Television, Inc. All rights reserved.
I'm telling you, if she can clean up her act and look "hot" again, all will be forgiven. The public is fickle and they like blondes with good bodies.
I bet this is for Harper's Bazaar. Demarchelier does a lot of photography for them.
ITA w/ Mrs. Dark.
This girl keeps wearing some assy ass wigs and it's just awful.
I wonder how long her hair is.
Big improvement.
Into the sunrise. The sunset is sad to me….it only means the night is coming.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks