Results 1 to 7 of 7
Like Tree7Likes
  • 1 Post By JadeStar70
  • 3 Post By sluce
  • 3 Post By witchcurlgirl

Thread: Michael Jackson estate slams new molestation claim

  1. #1
    mjw
    mjw is offline
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    3,377

    Default Michael Jackson estate slams new molestation claim



    10:00 A.M. PDT
    -- Howard Weitzman -- attorney for Jackson's estate -- tells TMZ Safechuck has denied many times over the past 25 years that Michael ever did anything inappropriate to him ... but is "now demanding money from Michael's Estate by claiming he suddenly recalls life differently." Weitzman says Michael is no longer able to defend himself, but "we believe these false and scurrilous allegations will not prevail."

    A new sexual molestation claim has been filed against the estate of Michael Jackson by a man who claims the singer sexually abused him from the time he was 10 until he was around 15 ... this according to a new report.

    This latest claim was added on to the lawsuit filed by Wade Robson last year, so says The Daily Beast. The filing is sealed, but the site reports the claims are being made by James Safechuck, who appeared as a child alongside Jackson in a 1987 commercial for Pepsi (see below).

    According to the report, Safechuck had long denied being sexually abused by Jackson, but decided to come forward after Robson made his claims public.

    There were rumors about Jackson's relationship with Safechuck in the late 80s ... the singer was often seen with the young boy following their commercial together ... including the opening performance of "The Phantom of the Opera" with Liza Minnelli (see above).

    The Estate has already objected to Robson's claim because it was both suspicious and filed too late.


    Read more: Michael Jackson -- MJ Estate Slams New Molestation Claim | TMZ.com



    The lawyer for the latest Michael Jackson sexual molestation accuser is coming out swinging ... telling TMZ the pop star routinely made the young boy skip school so he could be "available" to MJ.

    James Safechuck's lawyer, Maryann Marzano, tells TMZ ... MJ publicly flaunted his relationship with the boy, making it appear they were best friends and Safechuck was Michael's protege. The lawyer says in reality MJ was privately molesting the kid.

    As TMZ previously reported, James Safechuck (who appeared alongside MJ in a 1987 Pepsi commercial) is accusing Jackson of years of sexual abuse. MJ estate attorney Howard Weitzman has called the allegations "false and scurrilous."

    Marzano says a "narcissistic" MJ would prevent Safechuck from going to school as a 10 and 11-year-old so the boy could be available to him when he was on tour.

    Marzano tells TMZ, "If there is still any question about the predatory nature of Michael Jackson’s so-called ‘friendships’ with young boys, it should be laid to rest by the indisputable facts of what Michael did to James Safechuck."

    The specific accusations are sealed, but Marzano says the case against Michael is airtight.


    Read more: Michael Jackson Molestation Accuser: He Kept Me Out of School ... To Molest Me | TMZ.com





  2. #2
    Elite Member Brookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    In the "D"
    Posts
    24,747

    Default

    Scurrilous. Great word. I'll have to find an opportunity to use it in a sentence tomorrow.

    How much more evidence do they need with this guy?
    Life is short. Break the Rules. Forgive Quickly. Kiss Slowly. Love Truly.
    Laugh Uncontrollably. And never regret ANYTHING that makes you smile.

    - Mark Twain

  3. #3
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    4,171

    Default

    I am afraid to look in the MJ molestation thread

  4. #4
    Elite Member JadeStar70's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    BFE, Iowa
    Posts
    7,566

    Default

    I have always thought that there has to be video out there of Michael and some of these young boys. He always had this narcissistic need for perfection, and I would think he would have had that in his personal business too, not just his professional. I keep waiting for it to pop up and prove to the masses once and for all that he was indeed, a pedophile.
    Kittylady likes this.

  5. #5
    Elite Member sluce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Top Secret Spy for Leann Rimes
    Posts
    37,385

    Default

    Once again, where were his parents? I just can't comprehend getting so swept up in fame for your child, that you stop parenting effectively. I believe they should prosecute the abusers but the parents have some culpability too. Michale could not force a child to skip school without the consent of his parents.
    You don't engage with crazies. Because they're, you know, fucking crazy. - WitchCurlGirl

  6. #6
    Elite Member witchcurlgirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Acerbia
    Posts
    34,687

    Default

    I have always thought that there has to be video out there of Michael and some of these young boys. He always had this narcissistic need for perfection, and I would think he would have had that in his personal business too, not just his professional. I keep waiting for it to pop up and prove to the masses once and for all that he was indeed, a pedophile.there are people who wouldn't
    there are people who wouldn't believe it even with film, or photos. some people are just determined to give this pedo a pass.



    All of God's children are not beautiful. Most of God's children are, in fact, barely presentable.


    If I wanted the government in my womb I'd fuck a Senator

  7. #7
    Elite Member rollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    48,885

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sluce View Post
    Once again, where were his parents? I just can't comprehend getting so swept up in fame for your child, that you stop parenting effectively. I believe they should prosecute the abusers but the parents have some culpability too. Michale could not force a child to skip school without the consent of his parents.
    I agree but some people are just crazy star struck (especially back then when MJ was a big star) and of course $$$$$$$ was involved.

    How do you explain any stans really?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 19
    Last Post: November 4th, 2010, 06:23 PM
  2. Replies: 112
    Last Post: December 31st, 2009, 11:36 AM
  3. Replies: 25
    Last Post: November 9th, 2009, 11:32 AM
  4. Parts of Michael Jackson molestation suit tossed
    By Laurent in forum Gossip Archive
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: December 7th, 2006, 07:16 AM
  5. New molestation allegations against Michael Jackson
    By muchlove in forum Gossip Archive
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: January 17th, 2006, 10:15 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •