June 4th, 2008, 08:19 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 159
|
|
|
|
|
June 4th, 2008, 08:24 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: YOU press 1 for YOUR language, i already speak English
Posts: 11,831
|
i figured she'd get a receding hairline after all, she yanks her hair back so tight.
__________________
...if growing old doesnt kill me, being nice will
|
|
|
|
|
June 4th, 2008, 08:43 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: trying to figure it all out
Posts: 11,134
|
when or where's this from?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
June 4th, 2008, 08:52 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Out There
Posts: 11,085
|
What's bothersome is not her hairline or ponytail - it's the extremely weird orange shade of her skin tone. Is that self tanner? Foundation? It's all over.
__________________
"I don't say that we ought to all misbehave, but we ought to look as if we could." - Orson Welles
|
|
|
|
|
June 4th, 2008, 10:09 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurent
What's bothersome is not her hairline or ponytail - it's the extremely weird orange shade of her skin tone. Is that self tanner? Foundation? It's all over.
|
JLO has to be serious about tanners because believe it or not her natural skin color is a pale white, but that's hard to believe because she's rarely seen in public with her arms and legs exposed without covering them with foundation - even the back of her hands - and she's been doing that like forever. That's also probably why at some events her makeup is on so thick, and there is a stark difference between her scalp and her makeup in the picture.
I think JLO would be cute, but she would never be considered as beautiful as its said she is if she were to ever be herself, and not cover up her natural skin tone to the extreme that she does.
|
|
|
|
|
June 4th, 2008, 10:47 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Over the hills and far away
Posts: 8,717
|
Ahh.. a true chola at heart.
__________________
"And though the course may change sometimes, rivers always reach the sea." - Ten Years Gone
|
|
|
|
|
June 5th, 2008, 12:55 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Suffocating under a manatyy
Posts: 7,514
|
Her ponytail doesn't look fake to me. In fact, I'd say that's the only thing about her that's real.
__________________
Pretty today, dying tomorrow. Carpe diem.
|
|
|
|
|
June 5th, 2008, 08:18 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 15,423
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AsiaBlue
JLO has to be serious about tanners because believe it or not her natural skin color is a pale white, but that's hard to believe because she's rarely seen in public with her arms and legs exposed without covering them with foundation - even the back of her hands - and she's been doing that like forever. That's also probably why at some events her makeup is on so thick, and there is a stark difference between her scalp and her makeup in the picture.
I think JLO would be cute, but she would never be considered as beautiful as its said she is if she were to ever be herself, and not cover up her natural skin tone to the extreme that she does.
|
She looked olive skinned as a kid.
http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:...er%2Blopez.jpg
and wouldn't the foundation wash off when she got wet from swimming of sweating?
|
|
|
|
|
June 5th, 2008, 08:24 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Syracuse NY
Posts: 16,779
|
Probably hair loss from hormonal changes after having twins. Completey normal, though the damage she does to her hair everyday probably doesn't help matters.
__________________
Have a Coke and a smile and shut the fuck up!
|
|
|
|
June 5th, 2008, 09:05 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,494
|
...she's caught "corpse rot" from her husband..... 
|
|
|
|
|
June 5th, 2008, 09:52 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 27,708
|
I dont see a receding hairline, and the ponytail looks real.
__________________
Who the fuck is 'they say'?
|
|
|
|
|
June 5th, 2008, 09:54 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 159
|
Now I see the difference.
|
|
|
|
|
June 5th, 2008, 10:03 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The other side of the rainbow
Posts: 7,047
|
Forget the hairline, check out her oompa loompa face!
__________________
Knowledge is power. Power corrupts. Study. Be Evil.
|
|
|
|
|
June 6th, 2008, 11:36 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,275
|
Her hairline might be receding because of the PS.
In order to tighten the skin of your face, doctors cut a portion of it, close to the scalp, and sew everything back together, so you loose a stripe of skin that makes your hairline higher in your head...
Nicole Kidman is the perfect example to explain what I mean...
|
|
|
|
|
June 6th, 2008, 12:14 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 159
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LynnieD
Probably hair loss from hormonal changes after having twins. Completey normal, though the damage she does to her hair everyday probably doesn't help matters.
|
Right, but that picture is from August, 2007. They are getting her ready to shoot her "Do It Well" video. The receeding hairline could be from the wear and tear her weaves and hairpieces have put on it.
Last edited by Calimaster : June 6th, 2008 at 12:30 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 PM.
|
