August 10th, 2007, 03:30 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: behind a Guy Fawkes mask
Posts: 11,788
|
Well writ. Lily.
So true! sleeves are so many people's friend.
|
|
|
|
August 13th, 2007, 01:42 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: here, soon to be over there
Posts: 2,461
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honey
|
I love the strength and health that radiates from SJP's look, whereas Madonna looks sick and odd - even malnourished. I'm a fan of the muscles and veins and cultivate them. SJP looks so buff, fit, and radiant. I really like that a stronger beauty ideal is materializing that doesn't have to look starved or so freakin' calculated.
|
|
|
|
|
August 13th, 2007, 01:44 PM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
|
Vincit qui se vincit
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 34,634
|
I bet Matthew loves those masculine arms! 
|
|
|
|
|
August 13th, 2007, 09:15 PM
|
#34 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,289
|
^^^ Hehe! Sarah probably has a bigger crotch than Matthew, too.
|
|
|
|
|
August 14th, 2007, 02:55 AM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
|
Hit By Ban Bus!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,595
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ariesallover
I love the strength and health that radiates from SJP's look, whereas Madonna looks sick and odd - even malnourished. I'm a fan of the muscles and veins and cultivate them. SJP looks so buff, fit, and radiant. I really like that a stronger beauty ideal is materializing that doesn't have to look starved or so freakin' calculated.
|
i do agree with you though her arms a bit big. but compared to madonna's which i'm not even sure i believe, she looks good.
|
|
|
|
|
August 14th, 2007, 07:53 AM
|
#36 (permalink)
|
|
Silver Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 372
|
She looks fine to me. This is the 21st century people- women can have muscle definition. Muscle definition is better looking than no tone whatsoever on a slim/skinny body.
I assume that everyone who is criticising her looks better...I thought not.
__________________
I must go down to the seas again, to the lonely sea and sky...
|
|
|
|
|
August 14th, 2007, 02:56 PM
|
#37 (permalink)
|
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: City Of Brotherly Hate Philthadelphia
Posts: 802
|
ugh! that is so unattractive!
__________________
"Fashion is an art, but individuality is the key"
|
|
|
|
|
August 14th, 2007, 03:00 PM
|
#38 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,780
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heavenseventeen
She looks fine to me. This is the 21st century people- women can have muscle definition. Muscle definition is better looking than no tone whatsoever on a slim/skinny body.
I assume that everyone who is criticising her looks better...I thought not.
|
I have toned woman arms, not toned man arms.
|
|
|
|
|
August 14th, 2007, 03:20 PM
|
#39 (permalink)
|
|
Hit By Ban Bus!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Everywhere and nowhere.
Posts: 9,459
|
^Me too. The ultra-muscular look on woman is nauseating. It's not attractive. I'd rather see less tone and a lovely, radiant face than these.....ugh, whatever the frig they are. Orcs.
|
|
|
|
|
August 14th, 2007, 03:34 PM
|
#40 (permalink)
|
|
Mistress of Dick All
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,965
|
With SJP's unfortunate face, the last thing she needed was man arms. Yuck!
__________________
Scariest Halloween mask ever > > > 
|
|
|
|
|
September 21st, 2007, 02:30 PM
|
#41 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lost Angeles
Posts: 34,462
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lily
Dear Female Celebrities With Scary Arms,
They're called "SLEEVES." Look into it.
Love,
Everyone
|
__________________
MY VAG IS ENTRANCE ONLY! "I measure success by the degree to which I ruin other people's lives." -Gary Oldman  In any case as always: I BLAME BUSH!
|
|
|
|
|
September 21st, 2007, 06:28 PM
|
#42 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 3,434
|
SJP's floaty chiffon dresses and Rapunzel hair are totally incongruous with those arms. Looks like the fairy godmother of the bodybuilding world!
|
|
|
|
|
September 26th, 2007, 12:26 AM
|
#43 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: citizen of the world
Posts: 4,227
|
What has she done or not done to her face??? She used to be so striking and pretty and lately its just... not there anymore. BUt I cant put my finger on what it is.
Is she thinner / less body fat than in the old S&TC days??
|
|
|
|
|
September 29th, 2007, 07:50 PM
|
#44 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Eva's Love Den
Posts: 14,019
|
Not hot.
|
|
|
|
|
October 24th, 2007, 04:49 PM
|
#45 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,364
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calimoonchild
What has she done or not done to her face??? She used to be so striking and pretty and lately its just... not there anymore. BUt I cant put my finger on what it is.
Is she thinner / less body fat than in the old S&TC days??
|
The aging process? That old mother nature is a bitch!
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 AM.
|
