Bad Girl Interrupted "Home-wrecker"- Article on Angelina Jolie - Page 4

Mel1973 · June 16th, 2006, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrsDark

I dunno...Even when she was younger and wilder I never saw her at all these celebrity nightclubs hanging out and publicly being a cocktease like Paris or Lindsey or Jessica Simpson. These are girls who do things primarily for men's attention. Angelina is the real deal. People just can't handle sexual freakiness. Even in men they'll only accept to a certain level.

And worship her? C'mon, don't be crazy. Even Mother Teresa does not deserve that. (Especially MT for that matter)

I'm going to go along with one particular item - or add to it as the case may be: Angelina is probably doing a hell of a lot more for the world, poverty, disadvantaged children than those 3 walking sacks of shit you mentioned. And no, I don't really recall seeing a whole lot of Angelina at clubs.

ahtaste777 · June 16th, 2006, 01:11 PM

Quote:

but I wonder why Aniston's name was listed before.

Maybe it's alphabetical?
For example the other ties on the list positions 92 and 98. They're in alphabetical order too.

SlimandSexxy · June 16th, 2006, 01:12 PM

^^ ahh, thanks for the clarification, I guess Jennifer Aniston comes before Angelina Jolie. Gotcha!!!, They must have been using the lastnames in alphabetical order.

sluce · June 16th, 2006, 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlimandSexxy

Yeah, Aniston and Jolie are joined at 35, but I wonder why Aniston's name was listed before.

Thanks for the correction and you can be sure that there are many more nasty Jolie article to be posted in the near future, by your's truly and many more rags. tsk tsk....

Logic tell us that Jennifer was listed first because it is normal business practice to list ties in alpha order.

Yes I am sure you will post as many negative Jolie articles as you can get your hands on. I have never been particularly pro-Jenn or Pro-Angelina but your obvious slanted views and distortions make me like Angelina more each day. You make negative comments about anyone who disagrees with you as if there is no possible way that you could be wrong in any of this.

Makes me wonder why you are so committed to Jenn. Were you cheated on or did Daddy cheat on Mummy? What drives you on this?

ray shawn · June 16th, 2006, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Voodoo Child

Not alone but we are in a minority!

The best minority in the world. OK the board.

SlimandSexxy · June 16th, 2006, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ahtaste777

Oooops!!! Oh no slim and "sexy" who's got it wrong now?
You'll see JOINT 35. Now you run along and find some more nasty Angelina articles....
And dude it's hardly a "vindictive mission to be read". I post quite rarely, and when I feel I actually have something to say. Whereas others might come across as having a "mission", hence starting threads, ranting on and on.

I see you edited to add the bolded. Why does it bother you so much if I post a lot of negative stuff about Jolie??? Why does it bother you so much that posting negatively about her is fun for me especially when it attracts people like you. Ah schucks, the way of the apologists, you had to mention how you post rarely to justify your nest statements. And even if I was on a mission to ***Bash Angelina on Gossip Rawks***, why does that bother you so much???? See what I keep saying, it makes it all the more worthwhile when folks like you actually take notice and come gunz blazing, by the way thanks for the vote of confidence, I will take my "mission" more serious from now on.....

Quote:

Originally Posted by sluce

Logic tell us that Jennifer was listed first because it is normal business practice to list ties in alpha order.

Yes I am sure you will post as many negative Jolie articles as you can get your hands on. I have never been particularly pro-Jenn or Pro-Angelina but your obvious slanted views and distortions make me like Angelina more each day. You make negative comments about anyone who disagrees with you as if there is no possible way that you could be wrong in any of this.

Makes me wonder why you are so committed to Jenn. Were you cheated on or did Daddy cheat on Mummy? What drives you on this?

In what way do you get that I am in your words, "COMMITTED' to Jen. Here we go again, getting all personal, can't you like Angelina without getting personal at your fellow posters. I do not like Angelina and I make that known at every turn, in no way does that mean I am committed to Jen, like I said on another thread, I am a well-wisher to Jen. I wish her nothing but well because she deserves it. Unfortunately, I wish Angelina every bad thing that would come to her, because she also deserves it in my opinion, as a matter of fact, I do not wish Jolie well at all, and there is nothing wrong with that either, that's what varying opinions mean.

Can't bashing Angelina be left to just bashing Angelina instead of it being some love for Jen....oh my!!!! I can see the turn that this thread will be going to, but thanks for your input it's been noted. Why must you get personal huh?? What has my dislike for these two got to do with if I was cheated on or if my daddy cheated on my mommy. I come from a very stable and loving family if you want to know, have never been cheated on and have never cheated on someone else.

It seems you can't seperate your emotions from when you post, taht is the only explanation for all these personal attacks.

buttmunch · June 16th, 2006, 01:25 PM

Oh give me a break. Every Tom. Dick and Mary who slops out stew down at the shelter is doing for more than just helping the poor and downtrodden. There is always an element of feeling good about yourself or some other ulterior motive. This article is so ridiculous and I think it's refreshing that she's so straightforward.

And do people still get their knickers in a twist about a child 'born out of wedlock' (ooohhhhhh, dear me, also known as a bastard child....oooooooohhhhh)? Get real. And no man can be 'stolen'. He went where he wanted to go. No one can 'make' anyone do anything they aren't game for.

At the end of the day, I don't give a flying crap what her motivation is. I'm just happy that someone is putting even a bit of their money where their mouth is. In addition, she and Brad seem genuinely happy and together, so I say good on 'em. Live long and prosper.

SlimandSexxy · June 16th, 2006, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buttmunch

In addition, she and Brad seem genuinely happy and together, so I say good on 'em. Live long and prosper.

Hmmmm, not sure why, but I don't see them as being genuinely happy, they seem really detached and morose all the time in all their photos since they 'officially' started dating. Even the family photos with Shilo were so disconnected, there was no warmth between the two of them, so much so I was starting to wonder if their relationship was some sort of business arrangement. I guess only time will tell how happy and together they really are. By the way, this is MY opinion, you can respond to my opinion and not to me the poster, thanks in advance!!!!!

buttmunch · June 16th, 2006, 01:32 PM

Erm, ok, although there doesn't seem much there to respond to. I think your rather obvious distaste for the pair is plain for all to see...and you are entitled to that. Not sure where the need for the comment is coming from but really intgerested either.. Once again, world peace awaits me.

Karizma · June 16th, 2006, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buttmunch

Oh give me a break. Every Tom. Dick and Mary who slops out stew down at the shelter is doing for more than just helping the poor and downtrodden. There is always an element of feeling good about yourself or some other ulterior motive. This article is so ridiculous and I think it's refreshing that she's so straightforward.

And do people still get their knickers in a twist about a child 'born out of wedlock' (ooohhhhhh, dear me, also known as a bastard child....oooooooohhhhh)? Get real. And no man can be 'stolen'. He went where he wanted to go. No one can 'make' anyone do anything they aren't game for.

At the end of the day, I don't give a flying crap what her motivation is. I'm just happy that someone is putting even a bit of their money where their mouth is. In addition, she and Brad seem genuinely happy and together, so I say good on 'em. Live long and prosper.

ITA, and i just love it when fornicators are the ones who judge other's morality!

equallydivided · June 16th, 2006, 01:35 PM

Just an FYI, I have an obvious distaste for Brangelina as well. Everything about them makes me want to puke.

SlimandSexxy · June 16th, 2006, 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buttmunch

Erm, ok, although there doesn't seem much there to respond to. I think your rather obvious distaste for the pair is plain for all to see...and you are entitled to that. Not sure where the need for the comment is coming from but really intgerested either.. Once again, world peace awaits me.

Yep, I find them as a pair and the way they carry themselves very distasteful, a bit lacking in class if I might add. Well I was hoping you'd come back with a "How do you know that they are not happy, pictures only capture a fragment in time, they might have been together longer than they claim, noone has a child right away with someone they've been dating for onnly 4months, unless they had been dating for some time prior to that, if he is moing to adopt her kids, then they must be joyously happy", you know stuff like that. But thanks for not responding.

equallydivided · June 16th, 2006, 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karizma

ITA, and i just love it when fornicators are the ones who judge other's morality!

I fornicate

THEREFORE

I am.

SlimandSexxy · June 16th, 2006, 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by equallydivided

I fornicate

THEREFORE

I am.

Who said you fornicate, now that is a personal attack if I ever saw one. You see what I keep saying, Brangelina apologists can't seem to make their points without attacking their fellow posters, now that is something to think about. Why is this so???????

buttmunch · June 16th, 2006, 01:38 PM

Sorry I disappointed you. As far as people having kids that quickly, I know a fair amount who moved in or married someone as quickly or quicker and got pregnant very quickly as well. In fact, some people are known to have sex on the first date (gasp!) and that sometimes results in a pregnancy, which is sometimes carried to term. Shocking the times we live in, eh?

**edit. I just read what was written about fornicating. Now that I've stopped laughing, could someone explain how that's a personal attack? And who let Jen post here, anyway?