Angelina Jolie's bodyguard manhandles press photographer in Pune - Page 3

ediebrooks · October 9th, 2006, 05:07 PM

There are a lot of celebrities with kids who don't get involved in near-riot situations, unlike Brangelina. You don't see Gwen Stefani and baby Kingston brawling with the paps, and even skanky Kate Moss manages to keep her little girl out of scary confrontations with the paps. Many celebrity parents obviously use discretion, and Brangelina might really want to study them...unless they're determined to use their children to further their careers.

And I agree with the poster who said that bodyguard should be fired. Not even a pesky pap deserves to be throttled.

Elvira · October 9th, 2006, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Somerset

Oh Elvira, I love you!

Likewise.

(just adding more characters to my post)

SlimandSexxy · October 9th, 2006, 05:35 PM

Elvira, I love those pictures, now those are really telling.

I saw the new **cough** staged **cough** pictures, of the happy family riding through the streets of India. Today, I saw the video of how it all went down, and my gosh can the Brangelina fake it.

Wthout seeing the videos, you'd have thought how happy they must be, but I'm sorry, after seeing the video, there is nothing sincere or happy about all of their smiles and looks etc. With all the raucus that they were surrounded by, they were faking their plastic smiles, overemphasized attention to Maddox, both of them trying to play caring parents, etc. If you wanted to be caring, you'd give your child a normal life.....They disgust me!!!!!

Another staged PR ploy, even Maddox didn't seem too into the ride. In one of the pics, the two adulterers were fighting to get his attention, and he still didn't care or seem amused, poor boy was probably scared to death.

Sojiita · October 9th, 2006, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlimandSexxy

...the two adulterers were fighting to get his attention, ...

....................

ediebrooks · October 9th, 2006, 06:06 PM

I'm more concerned how that ruckus with the paps would have upset Maddox, than the "the two adulterers fighting to get his attention". It's just not right to use that kid for publicity, and to put him in scary situations like that.

Nitelite · October 9th, 2006, 06:40 PM

No one gets stalked like them...so those others kids are safe. For some of you to pin this on what kind of parents they are and not on the stalkarazzi guy is stupid.

The paps can cry “freedom of speech” all they want, but even on that there are limits. YOUR freedoms end when MY freedoms are impinged upon. Are you free to not allow people of a race you don’t like in your private apartment complex? NO. Are you free to yell “fire” in a crowded theater? NO.

The paps’ so-called freedom of speech ends where the privacy of the Jolie-Pitt’s, and the making of the film, begin. They are not free to walk into their hotel rooms, climb into their cars, or shove them. They are not free to impede them walking down the street, or to grab them. They are not free to verbally assault them and they are not free to jump out of a bush and frighten them. Are they free to take photos from across the street? Sure. Even from 10 feet back. Are they free to shove each other, elbow each other, knock each other’s cameras around? No.
You see, freedom of speech ends when it becomes assault, or battery, or threatening, or trespassing, or stalking. Just like having a rally in the town square. You are allowed to gather, but
you still have to get permits, not block traffic, mind noise ordinances, etc. Aggressive paps are not following the guidelines for freedom of speech.

This photog has a feeling of entitlement; he thinks he can do whatever he wants. He said something to the effect ‘I have a hotel room, here. I have a right to be here.’ Yes, he has a right to enjoy the hotel, his hotel room, and the grounds; he doesn’t have the right to suckle off of other people’s good times, especially if it’s private. His logic is a few steps away of those pervs who take pics of women’s crotches.

Voodoo Child · October 9th, 2006, 06:42 PM

http://www.snarkygossip.com/2006/10/...-photographer/

Big meat head.

KrisNine · October 9th, 2006, 07:07 PM

I feel sorry for the kid because he didn't ask to be part of all of this, but I don't feel the least bit sorry for them for the envasion of privacy. Sorry, but I don't. I've said it before and I'll say it again, that's the price you pay when you demand the perks that come along with being a celeb. I've lived in DC and in LA and have seen road closures that rival the Secret Service ushering in the President when a celebrity is having a party along PCH. Remember when they came home from Africa with the baby? They got a police escort. This is the price that they're going to pay.

UndercoverGator · October 9th, 2006, 07:52 PM

Really, who cares. Neither are that talented, mostly they've gotten by on looks. The whole old style over substance thing.

The sooner both Angelina and Brad disappear from public the better along with their boring antics.

Feel sorry for those poor kids being raised by two certifiable twits.

Sojiita · October 9th, 2006, 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nitelite

No one gets stalked like them...so those others kids are safe. For some of you to pin this on what kind of parents they are and not on the stalkarazzi guy is stupid.

The paps can cry “freedom of speech” all they want, but even on that there are limits. YOUR freedoms end when MY freedoms are impinged upon. Are you free to not allow people of a race you don’t like in your private apartment complex? NO. Are you free to yell “fire” in a crowded theater? NO.

The paps’ so-called freedom of speech ends where the privacy of the Jolie-Pitt’s, and the making of the film, begin. They are not free to walk into their hotel rooms, climb into their cars, or shove them. They are not free to impede them walking down the street, or to grab them. They are not free to verbally assault them and they are not free to jump out of a bush and frighten them. Are they free to take photos from across the street? Sure. Even from 10 feet back. Are they free to shove each other, elbow each other, knock each other’s cameras around? No.
You see, freedom of speech ends when it becomes assault, or battery, or threatening, or trespassing, or stalking. Just like having a rally in the town square. You are allowed to gather, but
you still have to get permits, not block traffic, mind noise ordinances, etc. Aggressive paps are not following the guidelines for freedom of speech.

This photog has a feeling of entitlement; he thinks he can do whatever he wants. He said something to the effect ‘I have a hotel room, here. I have a right to be here.’ Yes, he has a right to enjoy the hotel, his hotel room, and the grounds; he doesn’t have the right to suckle off of other people’s good times, especially if it’s private. His logic is a few steps away of those pervs who take pics of women’s crotches.

Actually you are allowed to yell 'fire' in a crowded theater-as long as there really is a fire.

And Joli-Pitt are really no different than the pageant moms turning their kids into pedo bait. If they are going to use their kids as bait for the photographers and use them as stepping stones to even greater 'fame'-(infamy in my book),practically prostitute them to the rags for 'exclusive deals..then evil Ang and her dolt Brad get what they deserve.

mistify · October 9th, 2006, 09:43 PM

^^^^^ Absolutely!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Brangelina Sux!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Bellatheball · October 9th, 2006, 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sojiita

The bitch brother-fucker Jolie is getting just what she deserves for putting her kids in the spotlight and using them to further HER celebrity status. Piss on her..boo fricken' hoo Ang stop using your kids as pawns in your celebrity/spotlight chess game and maybe you won't have so many problems..*eyeroll of disgust*

Soj, I had no idea you were on (gasp!) our side.

LOL!!

WickedHo · October 10th, 2006, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Voodoo Child

http://www.snarkygossip.com/2006/10/...-photographer/

Big meat head.

Maddox wasn't there. The above footage of the bodyguard choking the pap is not the same as the rickshaw footage. So, yeah, Maddox was looking scared because of all the paps chasing them (in the rickshaw footage), and I'm sure it's not the first time.

Do some of you think the rickshaw ride was a publicity stunt? Really? You "hate" the JPs that much? Oh, come on! I'm Team Aniston, but even I understand that being a celebrity doesn't mean you no longer do the same things regular folk do. Gawd.

Bellatheball · October 10th, 2006, 04:33 PM

^^ Whether or not you are an AJ is neither here nor there. Most people are willing to say they enjoy the spotlight. Aside from that, where did the hate comment come from? Voodoo loves to rib AJ but I've never gotten a hate vibe from her.

Do we all need to pass the funky cigs again?

WickedHo · October 10th, 2006, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bellatheball

^^ Whether or not you are an AJ is neither here nor there.

Hunh? What's an AJ??

Quote:

Most people are willing to say they enjoy the spotlight.

They who? The JP's? Yes, I'm sure they do enjoy the spotlight. But who wants a spotlight on them all the time? Not even Fuggles McHilton wants to be in the spotlight 24/7/365.

Quote:

Aside from that, where did the hate comment come from? Voodoo loves to rib AJ but I've never gotten a hate vibe from her.

I said "hate." Not actual, literal hate. I like to rib 'em, too, but still... It's just a rickshaw ride. Nothing more. The paps are there because they know where to find them. And I still say that Maddox was looking scared because of the swarm of paps chasing them in a not-so-safe friggin' RICKSHAW!

He wasn't scared because the bodyguard was choking a craparazzo, that was a completely separate event captured on a completely different video.

Quote:

Do we all need to pass the funky cigs again?

Hell, any time's a good time for the funky cigs!!