Angelina Jolie runs away like a scared rabbit from Jennifer Aniston

[ediebrooks]

Slim, you were backlashing before backlashing was cool.

[JuicyLucy]

Angelina looks fierce in that picture. I would duck out too, I mean... if I stole someone's husband and had a baby with him. I also heard somewhere Brad isn't the only taken man she's caught the eye of or pursued. Apparently there's been a few co-stars. Maybe she gets off on it?

[SlimandSexxy]

^^^^^ Angelina is a known homewrecker, women in Hollywood have taken note so much so Antonio Banderas' wife was on set all day everyday during the making of their movie "original sin," and the media ran with how she (His wife that is, I forget her name) was insecure blah blah (she wanted to make sure her marriage stayed firm and her husband would come home after the movie, can't say I blame her because that's why they are still married). I remember the whole Ethan Hawke thing, the tabs were splashed with "Angelina the homewrecker strikes again" beside a picture of her smooching him in his trailer while he was still married.

Originally Posted by ediebrooks

Slim, you were backlashing before backlashing was cool.

Lol ... Exactly.

[SunShine23]

^^oh yes, every costar!!! Colin Farrell, Timothy Hutton, Billy Bob...whoever she's in a movie with. If anyone saw the Good Shepherd-i didn't pay, but opted to illegaly download-she plays a slut who traps Matt Damon by forcing herself on him and getting pregnant. Hmm...wonder why that role appealed to her.
To Echo: The slope is that to take Angelina out of context is to assume that the media in general takes celebs out of context, hence the slope. one celeb to many. why is she the exception. how do you know it was taken out of context?. a reporter used the word and she agreed. regardless of the blob, the whole less feeling for shiloh or w/e other crap she spewed is also quite disturbing. i think she's a freak and a PR whore based on all the other stuff she's done. the blob comment didn't affect me-I just thought she sounded dumb lol

[Mrs. Echo]

She said that she wouldn't have any biological children because that would be one less orphan to rescue
This was when she was a single mother. So what. How does that make her a monster?

Next she has the baby and is NEVER seen with it, so I take it that she doesn't even spend time with the child anyways like sweetness just mentioned. (apparently, being seen with your child as a celeb sorta equates with being a good mother). Hence, she's been such a good mother to Zahara since she was 5 or is it 6months old and yet can't make time for her own child.
That is an insane statement. Which handbook should I pickup for the celeb/good mother rules? None of us has any idea how much time she spends with each of her children.

She says that she wants to find the right race and color to match her current accessories ... oops adopted children.
I could go on and on and on and on but it would be to no avail.
If you read the article you would know that she said that the baby has her and Brad to look at already, so when thinking about adopting again, they wanted to find children that Z and Mad would be able to relate to on a racial level. Is that a bad thing?

I don't know why there is a backlash against her. I have NEVER liked her and have always been "backlashing" her if that's a word. Maybe it has to do with the fact that she's constantly pimping her charity and adopted children, breaking homes, trying to change her image and using poor innocent lives in the process. I really don't know why there is suddenly this backlash, like I said, I've NEVER liked her even when the media kept shoving her down my throat ... I always regurgitated it.
She is a UN Embassitor. It is her JOB to “pimp” her charities. Why is it a bad thing to bring attention to good causes? What’s bad about adopting children? She probably did break a home or two. If that’s why you were mad, I’d get it. Not really sure how she using poor innocent live?

[ediebrooks]

This may be a little hard, but I'm going to try to place myself in Angelina's shoes, and a reporter is suggesting that my own baby is a blob. I would probably say, "No, Shiloh, is not a blob, she is my baby, and I love her".

[sweetness]

Originally Posted by SlimandSexxy

Next she has the baby and is NEVER seen with it, so I take it that she doesn't even spend time with the child anyways like sweetness just mentioned. (apparently, being seen with your child as a celeb sorta equates with being a good mother).

I meant Britney's never around her blob, er, I mean baby.

[SunShine23]

"That is an insane statement. Which handbook should I pickup for the celeb/good mother rules? None of us has any idea how much time she spends with each of her children."
Yes we do. we see her with maddox and zahara all the time, and she toted them around as babies all the time as well.


"If you read the article you would know that she said that the baby has her and Brad to look at already, so when thinking about adopting again, they wanted to find children that Z and Mad would be able to relate to on a racial level. Is that a bad thing?"

Yes. If you don't care about race, why are you "matching races" Then let a black family adopt Zahara if you want them to relate.

She is a UN Embassitor. It is her JOB to “pimp” her charities. Why is it a bad thing to bring attention to good causes? What’s bad about adopting children? She probably did break a home or two. If that’s why you were mad, I’d get it. Not really sure how she using poor innocent live?
SHE BROKE LIKE 100 HOMES. HER WHOLE LIFE IS A PR CAMPAIGN!!

[SlimandSexxy]

Wow Mrs. Echo, it seems like you have this all worked out. This is like some kind of mantra that you have worked out and you plan on defending ... Most of what you said is hogwash to me. "Maybe she broke a home or two" ... are u kidding me, LMAO. And you don't find it offensive that she wants to choose children that match with her current children's race etc. Your entire post is simply dumbfounding!!!!

I think I've heard it all. You were the one that posted the article from Lainey right?!?! Just checking.

I've had enough fun for one day. Have fun.

[Mrs. Echo]

I see you point now. She is a filthy whore!
Your compelling arguments has really opened my eyes.

[ediebrooks]

There you go, Mrs. Echo! We knew you'd come around(wink).

[SlimandSexxy]

Originally Posted by Mrs. Echo

I see you point now. She is a filthy whore!
Your compelling arguments has really opened my eyes.

I'm glad you see my point even though I wouldn't characterize her as such. She's actually a filthy homewrecking (emphasis added) whore.

Don't worry Mrs. Echo, you love her and I hate her, Deal. There's room for the both of us, enjoyed our discussion.

[Mrs. Echo]

Originally Posted by SlimandSexxy

Wow Mrs. Echo, it seems like you have this all worked out. This is like some kind of mantra that you have worked out and you plan on defending ... Most of what you said is hogwash to me. "Maybe she broke a home or two" ... are u kidding me, LMAO. And you don't find it offensive that she wants to choose children that match with her current children's race etc. Your entire post is simply dumbfounding!!!!

I think I've heard it all. You were the one that posted the article from Lainey right?!?! Just checking.

I've had enough fun for one day. Have fun.

I could say the exact same thing about you and your post. You will hate her to the end, you 've got her all figured out. And NO, I do not find it offensive that she wants to give her current children siblings that they can relate to. I am black and I think that it is wonderful idea. I really do. I think most minorities would agree. There is no mantra, I'm not saying the same things over and over. You all are. If you hate her because she is a slut, why didn't you just say that in the first place?
Yes, I am the one who posted Lainey's article.

[ediebrooks]

You guys are so funny.

[Mrs. Echo]

You may hate her, but I don't LOVE her. I like her like I like many actors. But, whatever. I am pleased that the discussion stayed civil and pleasant. Talk to you soon.