Angelina Jolie refusing to flash her junk onscreen cuz she's a mom

[AliceInWonderland]

Originally Posted by ediebrooks

I am very fortunate. I have only seen Angelina Jolie in one movie, which was "Gia". She was actually pretty good in it, but of course no one could ever be as gorgeous as the real Gia.

I know; she didn't really look like her or anything *shrugs*

[Voodoo Child]

Hmmm too much junk in that trunk I'm guessing.

[PrettyGirl]

Before Angelina was a wild child who didn't care about outside causes and she also didn't have kids. As anyone who's ever become a mother knows, I'm sure having children changes EVERYTHING. Therefore, I don't find this bit of information surprising at all. Just because she showed skin before doesn't mean she doesn't have to keep doing it for career purposes. Also, I'm sure that being a UNICEF ambassador sheds a whole new light on things. Trying to educate people about humanitarian efforts and then going back to Hollywood and showing your naked ass for a fictional movie just might pose a conflict of interest. It's a good move and if she's really passionate about the children of the world and truly a person who cares about global issues, then it's the right choice--both as a mother and an ambassador.

[buttmunch]

Yup, have a kid and suddenly all that fun you had while single is best buried in teh past. And I have to disagree about her sexapades. the idea that a woman who slept around is somehow a slut these days is absurd. That kind of htinking, I hope, is done with and gone, gone, gone.

[ediebrooks]

Call me old-fashioned, but I don't care for women who sleep around. And I guess it's good she's decided not to show the junk in her trunk, but I'm not going to say that her decision is just proof of how holy and sainted she is.

[Chilly Willy]

As long as she covers up those veins, I'm all for it.

[asha22]

Oh what a load of c&%^!! If i remember rightly she adopted Maddox in 2002.....and in 2004 was romping half naked in a raunchy sex scene with Ethan Hawke in Taking Lives.

[dowcat]

Originally Posted by Chilly Willy

As long as she covers up those veins, I'm all for it.

Totally agree!

[AgentOrange]

Originally Posted by SlimandSexxy

REAL REASON?????? -

She just had a baby, maybe her body is all saggy, which wouldn't be surprising since she NEVER works out - from her own mouth.

Must have had to have surgery to take off all the baby weight etc, as a result, her tattoos must be all fucked up and she must have some surgery scars

Her tattoo's have developed a slur! or at least a mild lisp.

[Bellatheball]

^^ OMG, that was great!

[SlimandSexxy]

Originally Posted by AgentOrange

Her tattoo's have developed a slur! or at least a mild lisp.

[CherubRock]

Originally Posted by buttmunch

Yup, have a kid and suddenly all that fun you had while single is best buried in teh past. And I have to disagree about her sexapades. the idea that a woman who slept around is somehow a slut these days is absurd. That kind of htinking, I hope, is done with and gone, gone, gone.

Well that whole line of thinking is perpetuated by other women. It is a damn shame though. There needs to be a cultural shift in thinking.

[dragonlady]

Let's be fair, now. Any person, man or woman, who sleeps around is a slut.