December 8th, 2006, 12:55 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Burning Down Your Windmill
Posts: 14,831
|
Quote:
Heather Mills has taken the extraordinary step of representing herself in court to reduce mounting legal bills in her divorce from Sir Paul McCartney.
Ms Mills has dispensed with barristers charging as much as £15,000 a day in her latest legal action against McCartney.
The decision to go it alone in one aspect of the divorce has raised eyebrows among the legal profession.
Although her final legal bill could be as high as £1 million, Ms Mills is likely to receive at least £20 million - and as much as £100 million - in the battle for the former Beatle's estimated £825 million fortune.
Ms Mills, 38, represented herself in the High Court last week and in applications to keep Sir Paul out of her home and to gain access to his.
The case is being heard by Mrs Justice Baron, one of the most eminent family law judges in the country.
A source close to Ms Mills said: "She has to be careful about the size of the legal bills and by representing herself she is able to cut down on the costs."
The source said Ms Mills has retained the services of London law firm Mishcon de Reya in the main divorce battle over money and custody of three-year-old daughter Beatrice.
But in the ancillary action, she appeared as a litigant in person without professional help.
The source said: "She is an intelligent woman and felt she was capable of handling this."
Ms Mills is still being advised on the financial aspects of the case by Anthony Julius, who handled Princess Diana’s divorce, and by Nicola Fletcher, a partner at Mishcons who is expert in family law.
When Ms Mills brought her own action in the High Court she was photographed clutching an A4 pad containing scribbled notes about the divorce.
The notes formed the basis of her speech and were headed: "I’m seeking an order for occupation of the matrimonial home," and were followed by three bullet points.
The decision on her court application to have McCartney, 64, kept out of her home in Hove, East Sussex, is expected imminently.
James Stewart, a leading divorce lawyer with Manches, said: "I would find it very peculiar if one of my bigmoney clients went off on a frolic in relation to other aspects of the divorce case."
A friend of McCartney’s said: "You couldn’t make it up."
Mr Julius, interviewed in the Daily Telegraph, refused to discuss the case but praised his client. "I’m happy to represent her. I like her and I have a great deal of admiration for her. She’s intrepid and stalwart...she also has a great deal of natural intelligence."
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1773
|
Has this bitch gone completely insane?
__________________
So........ you're saying that Froot Loops don't contain real froot? - Twitchy2.0
When the pants go back on, I'm wearing those motherfuckers. - Mel1973
Girl, you have way too many issues to keep up with - DeChayz
|
|
|
December 8th, 2006, 12:57 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Do fish have boogers?
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Venus
Posts: 1,000,002,097
|
Should be interesting...is this going to be televised?
|
|
|
December 8th, 2006, 12:59 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: pretending to be a lurker but I'm not quiet enough
Posts: 15,530
|
What, no way! She can't be that broke unable to afford a lawyer. Crazy lady
__________________
If you think it's crazy, you ain't seen a thing. Just wait until we're goin down in flames.
|
|
|
December 8th, 2006, 01:37 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 207
|
Quote:
|
Ms Mills has dispensed with barristers charging as much as £15,000 a day in her latest legal action against McCartney.
|
Well, that is a lot of money!!! Even so, she probaby could have found a more reasonably priced attorney to work with.
Or is she really so greedy that she wants every single penny of the divorce settlement?
|
|
|
December 8th, 2006, 02:10 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: No Sleep til Brooklyn
Posts: 3,187
|
Maybe dumb question but in Britain can you have a court-appointed attorney? (barrister) Or are public defenders reserved for criminal mishaps and not divorce cases?
|
|
|
December 8th, 2006, 02:23 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,841
|
Oh Jesus H, what a dumbass!
__________________
My Posts Have Won Awards. Can Any Of You Claim The Same? -ur_next_ex
|
|
|
December 8th, 2006, 03:08 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,709
|
__________________
Warren Beatty: actor, director, writer, producer.
***** celeb
|
|
|
December 8th, 2006, 03:25 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Friend of Gossip Rocks!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In a lecture theatre near YOU!
Posts: 18,692
|
This has nothing to do with money. In these situations the lawyers usually wait until they have secured a big settlement (she's going to get millions either way) and take their money from that. Either she's being a total bitch (dur) and the lawyers have ditched her (and want their money now) or she's even more arrogant and delusional about herself than anyone thought. I suspect she truly believes she can do a better job in front of the judge than a highly experienced top-end divorce lawyer. She is SO going to crash and burn.
__________________
stopp fucking talkin bout michael jackson you azz h0le! bitch ghet a fucknn lyfe bitch!
|
|
|
December 8th, 2006, 06:23 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: somewhere down the crazy river
Posts: 1,967
|
She's going to end up putting herself in a fine pickle! This could be very entertaining as it unfolds....!
|
|
|
December 8th, 2006, 07:01 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Watching the sun set over Lake Superior.
Posts: 12,790
|
It will be so wonderful to see Paul's legal team jump on her and rip her to shreds.
|
|
|
December 8th, 2006, 07:11 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Silver Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hell's Kitchen
Posts: 599
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by A*O
This has nothing to do with money. In these situations the lawyers usually wait until they have secured a big settlement (she's going to get millions either way) and take their money from that. Either she's being a total bitch (dur) and the lawyers have ditched her (and want their money now) or she's even more arrogant and delusional about herself than anyone thought. I suspect she truly believes she can do a better job in front of the judge than a highly experienced top-end divorce lawyer. She is SO going to crash and burn.
|
^^ITA.
I suspected for a long time that this bitch is way delusional...besides being a compulsive liar.
Outcome prediction- she will make an ass out of herself and blame McCartney's money/solicitors/popularity for anything bad that's coming her way.
And it will be a lot of bad:No.1 should be her total sinking in oblivion...she will die not being able to cawk around and be in the centre of attention.
.
__________________
----------------------
Respect is given when respect is deserved.
|
|
|
December 9th, 2006, 01:42 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Hit By Ban Bus!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: in the wild blue yonder
Posts: 15,485
|
I think is another pathetic attempt for attention. LOOK AT ME: POOR LITTLE CRIPPLE GIRL AND SINGLE MOM FIGHTING A BIG RICH MEAN BEATLE!!!!!!
That's what this is really all about.
|
|
|
December 9th, 2006, 02:48 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Penske material!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Great North West
Posts: 6,199
|
Idiot.
Unless he cheated, why in the world would she get sooo much money from the divorce? That's crazy.
__________________
I almost didn't recognize her without the aggressive camel toe ~ LAURENT
|
|
|
December 9th, 2006, 05:22 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Friend of Gossip Rocks!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In a lecture theatre near YOU!
Posts: 18,692
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sprynkles
Idiot.
Unless he cheated, why in the world would she get sooo much money from the divorce? That's crazy.
|
Because she is the mother of his child and that gives her a lot of leverage. Also they didn't get a prenup (probably at her insistance) so she gets a certain proportion of the marital assets. It would be the same deal if she'd married a waiter, only in this case the numbers are MUCH bigger. She may be a total bitch, but she's not stupid.
__________________
stopp fucking talkin bout michael jackson you azz h0le! bitch ghet a fucknn lyfe bitch!
|
|
|
December 9th, 2006, 06:02 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Watching the sun set over Lake Superior.
Posts: 12,790
|
Wasn't the reason for no prenup because they aren't enforceable in Britain?
Enforceable - is that a word?
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:25 PM.
|