Britney Spears poses naked for magazine, but naked Kevin did not make the cut

[teforde23]

Yahoo News

Apparently,
Britney Spears is out to prove she's not a girl and very much a woman.
ADVERTISEMENT

Just days after baring her soul on Dateline, the pregnant pop tart is taking a page out of
Demi Moore's playbook and baring, well, everything else, for the cover of the August issue of Harper's Bazaar.

The magazine confirmed Wednesday that Spears posed in the nude for the cover and an accompanying feature story and photo spread at a shoot on Thursday.

Unfortunately for Harper's, said photos leaked onto the Internet shortly after the conclusion of the shoot and were available on various Websites as of Wednesday afternoon.

In the images, a newly dark-haired Spears strikes various poses in all her six-months-pregnant glory, sometimes clothed, sometimes not.

A naked Sean Preston makes a cameo in one of the photos, clutched in his mother's arms. A naked Kevin Federline, thankfully, did not make the cut.

After the leak, Harper's released the cover shot for publicity purposes, but informed the non-Internet-using segment of its readership that it would have to wait until the issue hit stands on July 25 to view the rest of the spread.

Spears', shall we say, artsy cover girl stint comes after the singer was reportedly shocked by the negative reaction to her recent tearful Dateline confessional.

In a poll conducted by Us Weekly, 87 percent of respondents said they had less respect for Spears after her sitdown with Matt Lauer. Meanwhile, the New York Post reported that the NBC crew filming the interview was so startled by Spears' disheveled appearance when they arrived that they thought they had the wrong day.

As a result of the backlash, Spears apparently decided to prove that with the help of a little airbrushing, she can be the same Britney we once knew and loved. Except, you know, pregnant.

Meanwhile, according to a report in In Touch Weekly, Spears is considering returning to her roots--and not just the brunette ones. The magazine claims that the Louisiana native is considering moving back home to the town of Kentwood, where she was born.

"She wants to come home," Kentwood Mayor Harold Smith told the magazine. "She's building more rooms for her growing family. She wants a nursery and some kids' rooms."

The magazine claims that Federline is supportive of his wife's wishes, though there's no telling how the move could affect his quest to save the penny.

The couple is expecting their second child together, and Federline's fourth overall, in October.

[spinmonkey]

So it's come down to Britney pimpin' her pregnant ass out...UGLY necklace too!
I don't have a problem with photos of pregnant women, just too private a thing for the cover of a national mag for me.

[mtlebay]

Spears' artsy cover girl stint comes after the singer was reportedly shocked by the negative reaction to her recent tearful Dateline confessional.

In a poll conducted by Us Weekly, 87% of respondents said they had less respect for Spears after her sitdown with Matt Lauer. ...the NBC crew filming the interview was so startled by Spears' disheveled appearance when they arrived that they thought they had the wrong day.

HA! In your face Britney!

So the interview was made without her publicists, stylists, etc... and Brit's going on about, "I want to do things my way".

Well judging by the above quote, we see WHY she had an army of people representing her!

Originally Posted by spinmonkey

So it's come down to Britney pimpin' her pregnant ass out...UGLY necklace too!
I don't have a problem with photos of pregnant women, just too private a thing for the cover of a national mag for me.

But that's the thing, if it's a private matter for yourself, then you'd keep it private. But Britney's actually crying about how she wants her privacy and then she turns around and pulls this stunt.

Hypocrite.

[Voodoo Child]

Yeah right. Like her body looks as good as that!

[PrettyGirl]

I just seen these pics in the magazine section here on this site and I have to say they're UGLY. They're dark, gloomy and depressing. The background is so blah and what's with all the black? This photoshoot didn't do her any favors let me tell you.

People shopping for their groceries during the week will not have any more of a favorable impression of her when they're standing at the check-out line and see her pregnant, naked ass holding her boobs on the front cover of this magazine okay? Does she really think this is going to help her image?!?! She is pathetic.

[spinmonkey]

Originally Posted by mtlebay

But that's the thing, if it's a private matter for yourself, then you'd keep it private. But Britney's going on about how she wants her privacy and then she turns around and pulls this stunt.

Hypocrite.

Yeah, exactly, and my other thought was damn, the dough must be drying up so much faster than we ever imagined

[heart_leigh]

Demi did a better job posing naked while pregnant.

[MrsMarsters]

i'm sorry but britney is the ugliest pregnant woman I have ever seen..if you didn't know she was pregnant you'd think it was just a damn beer gut or cheeto bloat..she doesn't glow..imo this is tacky and disgusting..mostly because I find this bitch to be disgusting.

no way in hell she looks like that.

[drama_queen]

Bit Bit wishes she looked that good pregnant.

[Beeyotch]

Please tell me they are joking that there was ever actually a real possibility of a naked Kevin Federline photoshoot!!!!!! I'm sick just thinking about it. Who in their right minds would think that's a good idea to inflict that horror on the public? As if a nekkid, pregnant hillbilly Britney (well, half-Britney, since the other half was airbrushed into oblivion) wasn't bad enough!

[Bellatheball]

I actually think she looks good in those photos. Sure she's airbrushed but who isn't? Of course the whole "We're people and we need our privacy" thing just went out the window, didn't it?

[MillionDollarBaby]

i love that magazine but i won't but this issue..its a load of crap to put that hasbeen lunatic on the cover..i'm really disappointed in them

[SammysMom]

Good grief if they are both posing together naked isnt that like porn? I dont want to know how they made their babies Thank you very much!!!
Maybe it was his beer gut that got his pics cut. I mean it could make us common folk confused as to who was actually pregnant. HHEHE

[enctpc]

the thought of both of them naked.... that is too disturbing to think about.

[leapinglilies]

Originally Posted by MillionDollarBaby

i love that magazine but i won't but this issue..its a load of crap to put that hasbeen lunatic on the cover..i'm really disappointed in them

c'mon!! you know harper's got that shoot like SO cheap!!

i'm really disgusted with britany now. maybe it took me longer than most to come to this point, but she's a complete and TOTAL hipocrite now...