Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 33

Thread: Angelina Jolie's color-coded kids.

  1. #1
    Hit By Ban Bus! SlimandSexxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,019

    Thumbs up Angelina Jolie's color-coded kids.

    Angelina's color-coded kids


    Displaying the false humility he is known for, CNN's Anderson Cooper claims he has no idea why Angelina Jolie chose to cameo on "Anderson Cooper 360°." To borrow Golda Meir's apposite zinger, don't be so humble, Anderson; you're not that great.

    Jolie chose Cooper for the same reason model Molly Sims effused to Donny Deutsch about him: "Omigod, Anderson Cooper was in the dressing room. I like love his 'work.'" Sob sisters and simpletons simply adore him for his weepy, soft-news stories.

    Jolie must have sensed Cooper could be trusted to quickly change the subject when she magnanimously allowed that "just because someone's Republican doesn't mean that they don't also have the capacity to understand or care about children. ..."


    Equally, Cooper could be counted on never to turn confrontational when she disclosed her intention to acquire another kid. This time, the quest for couture kids would be fully color-coordinated. (As you recall, around the time Paris Hilton made accessorizing with a Chihuahua "hot," Jolie made it hip to wear an exotic, adopted, ankle biter on the hip.) Here's what she said: "We don't know which – which country. But we're looking at different countries. And we're – I'm just – it's gonna be the balance of what would be the best for Mad[dox] and for Z. right now. It's, you know, another boy, another girl, which country, which race would fit best with the kids."
    Cooper's response was to intone about how Jolie's "work with refugees has shaped the family she's creating with Brad Pitt."

    When speaking about crime and culpability (punishment is not an option), left-liberals like Jolie use the passive voice. Crimes are caused, not committed. Why, then, do Africans butcher, mutilate and rape their compatriots with clockwork predictability? Why do grown, Sierra Leonenean men hack off the arms of little Sierra Leonenean girls and rape them to shreds? Why is this repeated in Uganda, Sudan, the Congo, Rwanda, Somalia – you name them?

    Jolie offers a tautology: It's "from the violence" – "they had their limbs cut off from the violence." Or if you find this redundancy meaningless, she whips another bunny from her hat: blame "drugs, perhaps."

    Like Idi Amin, and the Prophet of Peace before him, Joseph Kony, leader of the Lord's Resistance Army in Uganda, justifies his 20-plus years of senseless slaughter with reference to a vision from God. Like the Janjaweed militia of Sudan, this thug's victims are primarily Christians and other non-Muslims.

    Note to Jolie: One doesn't need a multiple regression analysis to deduce that, besides endemic, age-old tribal strife, Islam contributes more to the equation of violence in Africa than, say, lack of education. The latter makes for resignation; the former for extreme agitation.

    When it comes to Western inaction or American stinginess (which Jolie codifies as "the broader picture"), our iconic brainiac is quick to recognize both evil and linear causality: "We have – we colonized them," she stammers. By the way, unscripted, the woman is incoherent; a scrambler of syntax. Consider this, vis-à-vis Iraq – it tumbled from her deformed mouth:

    "it's – it's done. It's – we're there. You start to see – the more times I have been to Washington, the more times you talk to somebody about, we have got to get money for AIDS orphans, or we have to get money for – whether it be any kind of response to any tragedy, often, the answer is, well, we're at – we are at war right now. A lot of money's going to war right now. We don't have – so – so, you start to look at it in a different way."

    Where was I? Oh, the colonization canard. The only peace Africa has ever known has been during colonization. This is a fact – it by no means aims to justify or recommend colonialism. As historian Keith Windschuttle has noted, pseudo-scholars such as Edward Said and legions of liberal intellectuals have made careers out of "blaming Western imperialism for problems that were endemic to many societies both before and after their experiences as European colonies."


    Half a century hence, Jolie would do well to remember that the ideas of human rights – the dignity of the individual and the respect for diversity – are distinctly Western, an outgrowth of the Enlightenment. If not for Africa's encounter with the West, these concepts would still be as alien there as Jolie is.


    Indeed, the notion that "she has found her place among these people in need" is plainly ridiculous. Jolie is as misplaced in Africa as Oprah is. When not on missions of mercy, she lives a life of unimagined (and well-deserved) wealth. Even if she chose to relocate to a mud hut, wear grass skirts and carry groceries on her head, she'd still be immune to every cruel contingency that plagues Africans.


    Ditto the silver-haired Cooper. The son of heiress Gloria Vanderbilt, he was born with a silver spoon in his mouth. To Jolie's patronizing jabbering about how she "loves Africa and the refugees," Cooper retorted inanely that "they are everyone. We all could be refugees at one point or another in our lives."

    How dishonest. Face it: In a crisis, certain prototype, potential refugees would be spirited away to safety; the rest of us would be left to rot. These two extraordinarily privileged individuals (Jolie because the public likes what she peddles; Cooper because of his kinship) chuckled as she mocked the Golden-Globes crowd.


    This is the nub of Jolie's pretensions. Not content to proclaim she has found a way to give meaning to a previously vacuous and vain life, Jolie needs more. She needs to feel as exceptional as when she advertised carrying ex-husband Billy Bob Thornton's blood in a vial around her neck. To retain a heightened sense of her own uniqueness, she derides the hollow heads of Hollywood.


    In addition to a Billy-Bob tattoo, seared into Jolie's flesh is a proclamation of her love for the U.N.'s Declaration of Human Rights. She hyperventilates about the roster of rights (most of them of the positive, bogus kind) listed by the UDHR. "These things are in our law. There are – there are – if you really look into it, we're all protected somehow."

    Yes, victims of Congolese warlords (in Africa, that often means the government) would be protected if only they too could etch in ochre "Know Your Rights" on their emaciated backs.


    So far, Jolie has put her money where her monstrous mouth is. Of late, however, she has ventured onto Bono's philanthropy-by-proxy turf. She'll soon be heading to Washington to petition for the transfer of funds not her own into corrupt African coffers.

    Concerning the morality of taxpayers' money compulsorily collected and distributed, I suggest Jolie study Lord Peter Bauer's "Dissent on Development," instead of the U.N. promo-pamphlets she professed to reading. Bauer, the foremost authority on foreign aid, knew the importance to civil society of voluntary giving – the kind Jolie must be praised for, so far. Foreign aid he saw as "outside the area of volition and choice."

    Alas, I suspect book recommendations from white, ex-South-Africans don't count for much. Come to think of it, dying white Africans don't matter much either. It's hard to imagine Jolie tearing up over the systematic extermination of Boer Afrikaners by blacks. Or visiting an Israeli child who has survived a suicide bombing. I know she has hung out with the M.O.P.E (Most Oppressed People Ever, aka the Palestinians).

    I guess some people just don't die as well as others.
    http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50750
    I need to stop with the boldening, this article is soooooooooooo spot on and has way too many good points that I might as well enbolden the entire article. I doubt Jolie is succeeding with trying to fool anyone into thinking she actually knows what she talks about. Even Bill O'reilly recently asked an expert on his show what Jolie actually accomplishes other than positive press, and of course the expert said that she uses these causes for good press to a greater extent than she actually knows what she talks about.

    The part in the highlighted purple is sooooooooo true, she totally made fun of all of Hollywood in that interview, trying to make herself feel so special and above them and their glitzy world, stupid b*tch of course doesn't care that it is the same Hollywood that made her who she is today. I'm sure her holier-than-thou attitude will cost h er,not sure how or when yet though. At this rate, she can't be caught acting, I mean acting should be for the stupid HOllywood crowd y'know.
    Last edited by SlimandSexxy; June 23rd, 2006 at 12:51 PM.

  2. #2
    Gold Member Karizma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,180

    Default Re: Angelina's color-coded kids.

    Like Idi Amin, and the Prophet of Peace before him, Joseph Kony, leader of the Lord's Resistance Army in Uganda, justifies his 20-plus years of senseless slaughter with reference to a vision from God. Like the Janjaweed militia of Sudan, this thug's victims are primarily Christians and other non-Muslims.
    Note to Jolie: One doesn't need a multiple regression analysis to deduce that, besides endemic, age-old tribal strife, Islam contributes more to the equation of violence in Africa than, say, lack of education. The latter makes for resignation; the former for extreme agitation.
    Actually Janjaweed are killing their fellow muslims in Darfur. Darfurian are 100% Muslims, this when ignorance become an issue.

    Unfortunately Ms. Jolie was right about education so certain people like the writer of this shit can learn more about facts and realize that Islam didn't contribute more to violence in Africa more than Christianity did, and that it's always uneducated thugs who contribute most to violence and wrong-doing not only in Africa but all round the globe.

  3. #3
    SVZ
    SVZ is offline
    Do fish have boogers? SVZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Venus
    Posts
    1,000,003,609

    Default Re: Angelina Jolie's color-coded kids.

    You know what I find funny? Or well...not funny. I was talking about Africa with someone in their late 20s, and I mentioned the Tutsis and the Hutus.

    They thought it was from a Dr. Zeuss book.

  4. #4
    Silver Member shaki80's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    FarFarAway
    Posts
    284

    Default Re: Angelina Jolie's color-coded kids.

    I'm not Angelina's biggest fan but whoever wrote this sounds awfully bitter and rather racist.

  5. #5
    Bronze Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    5

    Default Re: Angelina Jolie's color-coded kids.

    wonder what happens when the children grow up

  6. #6
    Elite Member MrsMarsters's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    HELL
    Posts
    7,238

    Default Re: Angelina Jolie's color-coded kids.

    KD is going to hate this..
    Life will break you. Nobody can protect you from that, and living alone won't either, for solitude will also break you with its yearning. You have to love. You have to feel. Horrible isn't it? It makes you so vulnerable.

  7. #7
    Elite Member Palermo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Nor Cal
    Posts
    9,536

    Default Re: Angelina Jolie's color-coded kids.

    don't get me started on Saint Anderson either; ever since Katrina he is certainly getting loads of coverage. I can't stand him. Another spoiled little rich boy that "feels their pain".

  8. #8
    Hit By Ban Bus! SlimandSexxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,019

    Default Re: Angelina Jolie's color-coded kids.

    Why should the writer of this article be bitter. The writer is an INTELLECTUAL who is also a published author, and when I say published, I'm not talking "how to use bathrooms all over the world", I'm talking serious "Women, race, depression" type books. so if you ask me, she has nothing to be bitter about. The title of her daily commentary blog is "Return to Reason" so basically, enough of the bull sh*t, let the truth be told, and it's also interesting to note, that this is prolly the first in a ton of her articles, that is about a celebrity, that definitely says something.

    I think so many people are simply fed up with the crap that Angelina keeps feeding, at first we were being polite to her by not actually calling her out, but the tables are turning, more articles are coming out about how incoherent she is, hoq much of a blabbermouth she is, and about h ow she simply wants POSITIVE PRESS. You can tell the article never mentions that she cheated with Brad, infact it never even goes into all the gossip about her relationship and all that, the article just hinges on the fact that she doesn't know what she talks about and instead needs publicity, so she should shut the f*ck up!

    The article critiques the CNN interview and bring to light the fact that Miss Jolie, wants the attention. She loves being loved, praised and adored, she's almost hooked on it, she always wants people to sing her praises, and feels like she's better than everyone in Hollywood, when she doesn't know jack sh*t about the issues.

    Nah, this is not a writer being bitter, this is a writer stating the facts as it is. It's unfortunate that gossip rags would rather buy into praising Saint Angie instead of actually seriously questioning her knowledge and motives. But I think a ton of people see through her crap.

  9. #9
    Silver Member shaki80's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    FarFarAway
    Posts
    284

    Default Re: Angelina Jolie's color-coded kids.

    Like I said , I've never been Angelina's biggest fan and I've never been impressed with her public speaking skills. She's always sounded rather incoherent and I don't know what it is with all the interviews she's given lately if she's so desperate for privacy. It's just that the first impression that I got when I finished reading the article was that the writer was a bitter person. I never argued that she was or wasn't an intellectual.
    Relax and take a deep breath now

  10. #10
    Gold Member Karizma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,180

    Default Re: Angelina Jolie's color-coded kids.

    We have our reasons to call her bitter and racist, just because she is anti-Angelina doesn't make her intellectual or even smart. You can still be bitch and trashy and anti-Angelina. Like i said before Angelina is a celeb and not everyone is going to be fond of her. The "facts" written here in this crap article about serious issues like Darfur and Islam are twisted so she can shove her info up her ass. At least Ms. Jolie is not a racist bitter bitch, and yes she visited Palestinian kids in Jordan because they are refugees and yes she went to 'Arab Children Day' to support those children, thankfully she didn't act all bitch and treated them as if they are terrorists like the author would have loved her to do so.

    And yes Anderson Cooper is one of the most renowened and respected journalist, who is she to criticise him? The man worked his ass off for the last 15 years visiting the most devastated places to deliver news on his own, he endangered his life to be a messenger of the truth, he knows what he is doing and he has his home work done. What the hell did this nameless author do or contribute to benefit others apart from barking like a homeless dog.
    Last edited by Karizma; June 23rd, 2006 at 02:08 PM.

  11. #11
    Hit By Ban Bus! SlimandSexxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,019

    Default Re: Angelina Jolie's color-coded kids.

    Quote Originally Posted by shaki80
    Like I said , I've never been Angelina's biggest fan and I've never been impressed with her public speaking skills. She's always sounded rather incoherent and I don't know what it is with all the interviews she's given lately if she's so desperate for privacy. It's just that the first impression that I got when I finished reading the article was that the writer was a bitter person. I never argued that she was or wasn't an intellectual.
    Relax and take a deep breath now
    Okay, phew!!!! I took a really deep breath.

    I guess my point is, if you look at the background of the writer, you'd know that she isn't bitter, infact, she is far from it. I'm thinking she's had it with Angelina talking about Refugees, Africans, US spending, and other issues like they are as simple as she (Jolie) tries to make them out, because she doesn't know. The writer has a lot of knowledge of these issues and can speak with authority. So I guess the crux is, Jolie should hush it or if she wants to talk about it, she needs to get accurately educated and stop making a mockery of the situation and Sop patronizing Africans.

    Oh yeah, the entire CNN interview was a joke as well!!

  12. #12
    SVZ
    SVZ is offline
    Do fish have boogers? SVZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Venus
    Posts
    1,000,003,609

    Default Re: Angelina Jolie's color-coded kids.

    I dunno...do you know how many people tuned in to watch that interview just for Angelina Jolie? Hopefully they learned something or became more aware of the problems in the world.

  13. #13
    Silver Member shaki80's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    FarFarAway
    Posts
    284

    Default Re: Angelina Jolie's color-coded kids.

    At least Ms. Jolie is not a racist bitter bitch, and yes she visited Palestinian kids in Jordan because they are refugees and yes she went to 'Arab Children Day' to support those children, thankfully she didn't act all bitch and treated them as if they are terrorists like the author would have loved her to do so.
    ^ I hadn't heard of her doing that and I have to admit my respect for her increased when I read this.

  14. #14
    Gold Member Karizma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,180

    Default Re: Angelina Jolie's color-coded kids.

    ^ Yes she did, she even donated to them. She was washed down for doing so by some racists like the author above. Instantly she became a woman who supports "terrorists". That's why i will always be grateful to her courage instead of going with the flow and demonize a whole cutlure.

    Shaki, here are the photos:
    http://www.wutheringjolie.com/nuke/m...ies&cat_id=363

  15. #15
    Silver Member shaki80's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    FarFarAway
    Posts
    284

    Default Re: Angelina Jolie's color-coded kids.

    Damn it, lol I feel myself starting to dislike her a little less now..

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Beige alert! UK to get color-coded terrorist warning system
    By Grimmlok in forum Politics and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 10th, 2006, 05:16 PM
  2. Angelina Jolie's new tattoo
    By MaryJane in forum Gossip Archive
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: June 11th, 2006, 10:53 AM
  3. Whatever happened to the color-coded Terror Alerts?
    By Grimmlok in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: May 17th, 2006, 05:18 PM
  4. Angelina Jolie's Sonogram
    By FierceKiten in forum Miscellaneous
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: January 20th, 2006, 11:11 PM
  5. Angelina Jolie's Adopted Kids Can Take Pitt's Name
    By Elvira in forum Gossip Archive
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: January 19th, 2006, 04:40 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •