Heather Mills' partner in porn to tell of real sex after photo shoot

[MaryJane]

LADY Mucca’s partner in porn is set to tell the world they had passionate sex over and over again after the cameras stopped clicking.
The curly-haired male model is hoping to bag thousands of pounds by selling his story of how he did it for real with Heather Mills.
His move will heap yet more shame on Sir Paul McCartney’s estranged wife — mother of his two-year-old daughter Beatrice.

Yesterday it emerged her divorce settlement from the former Beatle could be slashed.
Lawyers for 63-year-old Paul are bound to cite her pornographic past as grounds for his payout — until now estimated at £200million — to be reduced.

Heather, 38, suffered a THIRD knock as it was revealed top shelf men’s magazines are preparing to publish some of the filthiest images from her photo shoot with the male model.
She is already reeling after The Sun’s world exclusive on Monday, in which we told how she “starred” in a German hard core porn book in 1988.

Heather has insisted the book was merely a Lovers’ Guide-style self-help manual for partners.
But the pictures have no accompanying words — and her claims have been widely ridiculed. An angry-looking Heather turned up at Paul’s country spread in Peasmarsh, East Sussex, yesterday — accompanied by her lawyer.

It was the first time she has shown her face since the scandal broke. Paul was not there. He was at his home in St John’s Wood, North London.
Heather, who drove up in a black Mercedes 4x4, stayed less than 15 minutes before speeding away — apparently in a rage.

An onlooker said: “Heather drove right up to the farmhouse. She left in a right state.”

Heather is in talks to do a warts-and-all interview about her split from Paul — on AMERICAN TV.
She has told CNN host Larry King she is desperate to tell her side of the story. Heather has been approached by a string of British TV journalists including Sir Trevor McDonald. But she favours King as she has often appeared on his show — and believes she will get softer treatment in the States.

She also hopes to develop her career across the Atlantic.

A US TV source said: “Larry King will devote a whole hour to her story and she feels she will get a smoother ride. She has done at least three interviews with him in the last 18 months and feels comfortable.

"She is desperate to get her side of the story over before her divorce settlement, which is bound to include a confidentiality clause. Heather thinks she will get a fairer hearing in the US, where she intends to develop her career and remain a media personality and animal rights campaigner.”

Heather, who has repeatedly denied being a gold-digger, would not pocket a penny.
American TV rules ban news outlets like CNN from paying for interviews.

Passers-by quizzed by The Sun on Britain’s streets yesterday were united in believing Heather’s photo shoot was pornographic, NOT educational.

Shown pages of the German book, called The Joys of Love, catering worker Madeline Johnson said: “It’s just too rude to be a guide — the pictures show everything.” Madeline, 30, of Clapton, East London, added: “It would have some sort of text if it was meant to be educational. It’s definitely porn.”

Journalist Ruth Lumley, 26, of Brighton, said: “Blimey, I’ve never come across a ‘sex education’ book that has whipped cream in it.”

Facilities manager John Bertram, 52, of Manchester, said: “It would need more text and less in the way of edible undies and thongs. In this situation Heather is definitely a porn star.”

Printer Andrew Love, 42, of Basildon, Essex, declared the book “fairly hard core”.

And engineer Stuart Lye, 31, of Chingford, Essex, said: “After ten pages it’s clear you’re not going to learn much with all these whips and things.”

source and new pics http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006260282,00.html

[Sunrider]

“Blimey, I’ve never come across a ‘sex education’ book that has whipped cream in it.”

[aabbcc]

... and believes she will get softer treatment in the States.

A skank is a skank is a skank ... doesn't matter which side of the pond you're on.

[buttmunch]

LIke I tried to post somewhere else, I refuse to demand that someone apologize for something they did years and years ago. She was young and dumb and probably didn't imagine she'd one day marry a Beatle. Sure she's coming across as a bitch but still...

[Goose]

Can't these writers find an adjective other than "Desperate?" Everybody's desperate...Heather, Naomi, K-Fed...

[buttmunch]

How about 'gagging for it'?

[darksithbunny]

Why is this coming out now? Didn't she like do this back in 1988? Geez. Way far in the past to be getting upset about it now.

[buttmunch]

I agree. Past indescretions, especially that far back, are irrelevant and nothing to get worked up about.

[luccilla]

I agree that past indiscretions are just that. The problem is she's trying to label it "educational" rather than calling it what it is...something from her past. She'd get a lot less flack if she didn't try to spin it into something nice and just chalked it up to being young and stupid.

[Goose]

Originally Posted by buttmunch

How about 'gagging for it'?

[Luna]

She's an amputee and there is a whole set of people called devotees that get off on the sight of amputated limbs. I'm wondering if the shots weren't peddling to that venue.

[Alphachimp]

Originally Posted by luccilla

I agree that past indiscretions are just that. The problem is she's trying to label it "educational" rather than calling it what it is...something from her past. She'd get a lot less flack if she didn't try to spin it into something nice and just chalked it up to being young and stupid.

Well put - I agree...

[GoldDust77]

Originally Posted by buttmunch

LIke I tried to post somewhere else, I refuse to demand that someone apologize for something they did years and years ago. She was young and dumb and probably didn't imagine she'd one day marry a Beatle. Sure she's coming across as a bitch but still...

I totally agree, Buttmunch. I feel that WAY TOO MUCH is being made over this issue. Big f*cking deal--she did a porn photo shoot 20 years ago. 20 years ago!!! Are the 20-years-ago-pasts of the people in the media writing about her, clear of any tacky and/or "inappropriate" wrongdoing? I highly doubt it. I wish the media would leave this poor woman alone. It was a LOOOOOOOONG time ago. And, in my humble opinion, it's NOT A BIG DEAL!! It's just a photo shoot! A stuggling 18-year-old model posed for some sexy pictures. OOOOOOOOOOH what a SHOCK. It's not like they discovered that Heather murdered somebody, for Pete's sake. Lots of us do/did stupid things when we were 18 or 20 years old. I am just an average 28-year-old female from Manchester, NH (USA), but i have my share of bone-headed moves from my past, hidden away "in my closet". I used to be a struggling model, too. And believe me, i've got pictures in photographers' hands that i would not ever want to see the light of day, now. It seems like so long ago when i did things that i wouldn't even consider doing today, although it was actually only 5-6 years ago. In fact, i've often thought that i could never be a contestant on a reality show like "Survivor" or something, because with even that kind of fleeting semi-fame, i'm sure old skeletons would be brought out. (i.e., i can see the National Enquirer headlines now: "Survivor Contestant's Shameful Past as a Nude Model Exposed!") People should just get over this. Big deal--Heather did a sex book. Are all these people that are attacking her, total prudes or something? And anyway, Madonna, that upstanding Paragon of High English Society herself, even did a sex book! Team Heather Mills!

[leigh]

In a divorce, lawyers will do everything possible to damage your reputation, to call into question your fitness as a parent, and dig up anything you've ever done no matter how long ago. Is it fair? No. But rarely do divorce lawyers play fair, especially when BIG bucks are involved.
I feel bad for the child caught in the middle of this mess.

[britlitgal]

god, i love smutty uk tabloids. is there anything that they don't tell us??