February 22nd, 2006, 01:25 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Friend of Gossip Rocks!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Uranus
Posts: 26,375
|
Quote:
READ MORE: celebrity weeklies, covers, life & style weekly, tom cruise, top
To recap: Late in the day last Tuesday, Life & Style announced the imminent breakup of TomKat. Later that afternoon, Star rushed out a report calling bullshit on Life & Style. The next morning — a week ago today — Us Weekly further dismissed Life & Style’s breakup claim by not even deigning to address it. It seemed almost like an alliance between Star and Us Weekly against Life & Style. Until Star put out a story later last Wednesday directly contradicting Us Weekly. And there, eyeball to eyeball and with fingers on triggers, it seemed détente was reached; there’s been no inter-weekly skirmishing since, and peace has reigned in celebmagland.
Until today, when Life & Style’s new issue defiantly sticks with its TomKat breakup claim, thereby threatening the magopolitical stability we’ve come to enjoy over these last six days. How will things now play out? Will there be counterattacks and shifting alliances? We have no idea, but we think this is how World War I started.
Earlier:
TomKat to Kill Their Kittens?
TomKat? What TomKat?
‘Star’: ‘Us Weekly’ Is Full of Shit
gawker.com
|
God, I love Gawker.
__________________
The best art is understood by the fewest number of people.-James Franco on General Hospital
|
|
|
February 22nd, 2006, 02:15 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Mistress of Dick All
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,965
|
Re: Tomkat still broken up
Life & Style Round 2: Tom Cruise & Katie Holmes Secrets Revealed
By Cathy Beers
Feb 22, 2006
Quote:
Life & Style magazine caused quite a stir with last week's blockbuster cover story that claimed Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes were basically finished but were planning on keeping up appearances until the baby was born.
That brought swift denials from Camp TomKat and of course, threats of a lawsuit.
A Life & Style spokesman told The National Ledger that the weekly stands behind their story "100 percent." And now L&S is set to publish round 2 in this week's edition.
The weekly presents a very detailed story again in this week's Friday edition that will reveal the secrets of the split.
***
A few highlights from this week's cover story:
--It's all an act!
When the photographers stopped shooting, TomKat stopped smiling and they even reportedly backed out of buying a house in Ohio
--Yes, it’s over
“One thing Katie hates about Tom,” says an insider, “is that his image means so much to him. Katie knows their relationship isn’t going to work, and she doesn¹t like being part of a huge PR campaign.”
And her family isn’t going along with the charade. After the Life & Style story broke, an insider from Katie’s hometown of Toledo, Ohio, spoke to her dad, Martin Holmes. When asked if he wanted Tom and his daughter to reconcile, the insider says Martin blurted, “I hope not!” He told the insider that he intends to make sure Katie and her baby are financially set for life and that Katie will have custody of the child. “Right now,” Martin added, “all I want is for my little girl to be happy, and she isn’t.”
-- Katie’s dad didn't deny it
When a Toledo, Ohio, resident asked Martin Holmes if there was any hope of a reconciliation between his daughter and Tom, he replied, “I hope not.”
***
Katie and Tom made an appearance in Australia soon after the story broke and smiled for the cameras. It will be interesting to see how strong the denials will be this week after this story hits.
Or if they will make another smiling hand-holding appearance.
|
http://www.nationalledger.com/artman...27263668.shtml
__________________
Scariest Halloween mask ever > > >
|
|
|
February 22nd, 2006, 03:37 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: searchin' for my lost shaker of salt
Posts: 12,822
|
Tis the beginning of the end for Tom Terrific and his beard.
|
|
|
February 22nd, 2006, 03:43 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,150
|
I know this is a tabloid so maybe they are making it all up, but they are just saying what the rest of us are thinking. TomKat is a sham relationship contrived for publicity. It just goes to show what shitty actors Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes are, if they think that over-the-top, couch jumping, smiling ALL the damn time is convincing any of us that this relationship is real. If they had kept it low-key, I'd be more inclined to believe it. But they're trying to create this real life fairy tale (proposing on top of the Eifel Tower  ) and the public just isn't buying it.
|
|
|
February 22nd, 2006, 03:53 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lost Angeles
Posts: 34,493
|
yeah Tom's "image" is all he has besides his role as leader of the Scientogist brigade; he's a complete whack job!
__________________
MY VAG IS ENTRANCE ONLY! "I measure success by the degree to which I ruin other people's lives." -Gary Oldman  In any case as always: I BLAME BUSH!
|
|
|
February 22nd, 2006, 04:51 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Neverlands
Posts: 6,923
|
Katie is a nutcase for not leaving him, the ship has sailed and burn the lifejackets for any chance to save her ass.
__________________
Im ashamed to say what I did for a klondike bar...
|
|
|
February 22nd, 2006, 05:06 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 8,570
|
Does anyone else wonder if the Scientologist will kick him out for making a mockery of their sham...um I mean religion?
|
|
|
February 22nd, 2006, 05:14 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sweet Down Under!
Posts: 11,683
|
Katie has probably signed some silly agreement that ties her in with Tom for a number of years etc. Much like the speculation about Nicole. I feel for Katie. She has got herself into something she probably cannot get out of now.
|
|
|
February 22nd, 2006, 05:18 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Hit By Ban Bus!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: In another dimension, untouched by time
Posts: 6,835
|
I read the Life and Style cover story last week, and actually it made a lot of sense. I know Life and Style is a fluffy magazine, but the article was actually presented very logically. I think the story is true.
|
|
|
February 22nd, 2006, 10:16 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Neverlands
Posts: 6,923
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Voodoo Child
Katie has probably signed some silly agreement that ties her in with Tom for a number of years etc. Much like the speculation about Nicole. I feel for Katie. She has got herself into something she probably cannot get out of now.
|
You forgot that Tom keeps her mind, body and soul.
__________________
Im ashamed to say what I did for a klondike bar...
|
|
|
February 22nd, 2006, 11:45 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,785
|
Seriously.. how can one person make a contract up for another person?
I am certain Nicole didn't have to sign a whacko contract. I know she was made to sign one about the "10 year mark".. but I doubt there was one that tied her to him for a certain about of years.
What is going on with Tom...and Katie? Why'd he turn into a whacko with this woman and not Penelope Cruz, or Nicole??
|
|
|
February 23rd, 2006, 12:04 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Silver Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 634
|
what you mean icepik? there can be contracts for all kinds of deals. and apparently in hollywood marriage is a deal. where else would you have a bunch of freaks pretending so hard to keep the image they`re normal? and we're talking about tom cruise, a dude that can hide with the help of his entourage anything he wants.
|
|
|
February 23rd, 2006, 12:09 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,785
|
Yes, I know there are contracts, but ones where the other person isn't allowed to LEAVE? That is incredible.
I just wonder why he's turned into a nutcase with Katie. I've actually thought maybe it's a Scientology thing. They told him he has to be married again, or married with biological children by a certain time frame.
He's gotten so bizarre that I have been trying to make the whacko-ness of this make sense, even if it is in a insane kind of way
|
|
|
February 23rd, 2006, 12:22 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southern US
Posts: 14,566
|
What stands out to me is the fact that they aren't married yet.
Obviously, they are pro-marriage people. There was a proposal, an engagement, all that stuff, so there is no ambivalence about the institution of marriage. They have proclaimed their commitment to each other as loudly and as frequently as the opportunity was given, so fear of commitment doesn't seem to be an obstacle. They don't have to save up $$$ for a nice ceremony. They're both of age. Nobody's in college or deployed in Iraq. They can choose a wedding location from the entire planet. He's amazing, she's incredible. There is a "baby" on the way. They're in love  , they're commited  , and they have every reason in the world to be married NOW.
So WHAT is the hold up here, folks? WHAT could it be?
|
|
|
February 23rd, 2006, 12:38 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Friend of Gossip Rocks!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: the new casino
Posts: 4,732
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lobelia
What stands out to me is the fact that they aren't married yet.
Obviously, they are pro-marriage people. There was a proposal, an engagement, all that stuff, so there is no ambivalence about the institution of marriage. They have proclaimed their commitment to each other as loudly and as frequently as the opportunity was given, so fear of commitment doesn't seem to be an obstacle. They don't have to save up $$$ for a nice ceremony. They're both of age. Nobody's in college or deployed in Iraq. They can choose a wedding location from the entire planet. He's amazing, she's incredible. There is a "baby" on the way. They're in love  , they're commited  , and they have every reason in the world to be married NOW.
So WHAT is the hold up here, folks? WHAT could it be?
|
  
__________________
♫ÀàâäçÉéèêë`ï î½ñÕôöøü ∴|| • ~∞≠∝ ♫♪ £$¢¥ -4°C©®™¹ ² ³
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 AM.
|