February 22nd, 2006, 07:01 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Mistress of Dick All
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,965
|
02-22-06
Tom's New Mission Impossible For Katie
Quote:
|
Tom Cruise plans to show that he is still leading man in Hollywood by making Mission: Impossible 3 big news - without his pregnant partner Katie Holmes. Top Gun star Cruise is said to have been angered by criticism of his publicity campaign for War of the Worlds and how the film was overshadowed with his love life. Now Cruise plans to leave Katie at home while he helps whip up audiences for MI3. "Mission Impossible is very much Tom's movie and that is how he will be pushing it around the world," says a source close to the actor. "Katie will not be joining him, not just because of their baby, but because he resents the accusations that he used their relationship to make headlines last summer. He and Katie have a big project of their own to worry about anyway - a baby. He won't make the mistake of mixing his personal life with business again."
|
http://www.absolutenow.com/
__________________
Scariest Halloween mask ever > > > 
|
|
|
|
February 22nd, 2006, 07:09 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Valley of the Dolls
Posts: 3,235
|
we'll see about that!!! as soon as tickets sales go down for that movie we'll see them out and about with the new baby ASAP!
|
|
|
|
|
February 22nd, 2006, 07:13 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 2,140
|
His personal life is of far more interest than his wanker movies anyday. A Tom Cruise movie is a joke. I can only ever see him as a fool now. I want to see him go off his head at interviewers and watch him tote around a baby that isnt his and watch Nicole get more and more famous and him ridiculed for being the tosser that he is.
__________________
I'm confused.............no wait....maybe I'm not......
|
|
|
|
|
February 22nd, 2006, 07:23 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Friend of Gossip Rocks!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Uranus
Posts: 26,276
|
She probably is scheduled for round three of Scientology programming, erm, I mean instruction.
__________________
The religion of one age is the literary entertainment of the next.--Ralph Waldo Emerson
|
|
|
|
|
February 22nd, 2006, 09:37 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 8,570
|
And so it begins.....
I give them three months.
|
|
|
|
|
February 22nd, 2006, 10:14 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: searchin' for my lost shaker of salt
Posts: 12,822
|
I'm with you Bella...we should start a countdown.
God, I sound horrible...I'm entirely too cynical 
|
|
|
|
|
February 23rd, 2006, 12:08 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Silver Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 634
|
so, he will be AT LEAST present when the baby is born?
what an ass.
|
|
|
|
|
February 23rd, 2006, 01:41 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,490
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by calendargurl
we'll see about that!!! as soon as tickets sales go down for that movie we'll see them out and about with the new baby ASAP!
|
Totally agree... if the movie doesnt bring in the dollars the baby will be out there for everyone to see. I cant see him doing a turnaround now and not gushing about how "fantastic" Katie is...
|
|
|
|
|
February 23rd, 2006, 01:42 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Do fish have boogers?
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Venus
Posts: 1,000,002,103
|
apparently MI3's premiere is the expected date for the baby
|
|
|
|
|
February 23rd, 2006, 01:51 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Valley of the Dolls
Posts: 3,235
|
coincidence? i think NOT! lol
|
|
|
|
|
February 23rd, 2006, 11:24 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: transplanted
Posts: 755
|
He probably doesn't want Katie to whip up any publicity. I mean it wouldn't be a good thing if Tom's breeder gets more attention than him.
|
|
|
|
|
February 23rd, 2006, 04:31 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In search of non disfigurated fatherwood
Posts: 7,164
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by stardust
so, he will be AT LEAST present when the baby is born?
what an ass.
|
He wasn't there for the conception so why be there for the birth?
|
|
|
|
|
February 24th, 2006, 02:05 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 2,140
|
he may have been there at the implantation ceremony though........
__________________
I'm confused.............no wait....maybe I'm not......
|
|
|
|
|
February 24th, 2006, 04:40 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,490
|
Maybe Katie should just go out without him.... and not to the coffee shop somewhere a long way from him
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 PM.
|
