Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: 16 secrets the restaurant industry doesn't want you to know

  1. #1
    Elite Member celeb_2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    13,468

    Default 16 secrets the restaurant industry doesn't want you to know

    16 Secrets The Restaurant Industry Doesn't Want You to Know - Page 1 - MSN Health & Fitness - Nutrition

    By David Zinczenko, editor-in-chief of Men's Health and author of Eat This, Not That
    Men's Health

    What does the restaurant industry have to hide? A lot, apparently. A hidden force behind America's obesity epidemic is the fact that many chain restaurants-which provide one-third of all restaurant meals, according to the New York Department of Health-obfuscate the fat and calorie counts of their menu items, and fight any attempt to shed light on what, exactly, is going on between their buns and inside their taco shells.
    Last summer, when coauthor Matt Goulding and I began researching Eat This, Not That, we were shocked by how far restaurants were willing to go to hide their nutritional info from our prying eyes. So we conducted our own scientific testing, consulted with nutrition experts, and did some good old-fashioned snooping. In the end, we uncovered countless secrets these mega-restaurateurs had been keeping. The 16 most mind-blowing are below, but they just scratch the surface, really.
    Since Eat This, Not That hit bookstores in December 2007, it's become a bestseller. And, in one city anyway, the hide-the-calories game has gotten a bit tougher—a new law in New York City compels restaurants to list calorie data. (Similar legislation was first passed in 2006, but only took effect in June because it had to survive several legal challenges from—you guessed it—the restaurant industry.) But, for the most part, little has changed.
    So it's no wonder that . . .
    1. Outback Steakhouse
    ... doesn't want you to know that the only nutritional information it provides is for its Tangy Tomato Dressing. When we contacted the company, a spokesperson claimed, "Ninety percent of our meals are prepared by hand ... Any analysis would be difficult to measure consistently." Yet, no fewer than 45 national restaurant chains do just that. One of our sources—calorieking.com, which has analyzed more than 55,000 foods—reported that an order of Outback's Aussie Cheese Fries has 2,900 calories, and its Ayers Rock Strip has 60 grams of fat.
    July 2008 Update: Because Outback has a New York City location, it's been forced to reveal nutritional info. It lists the Aussie Cheese Fries at 2,030 calories. Did the company change the recipe? Reduce the portion size? Stay tuned: We'll be investigating this further.
    2. Applebee's
    ... doesn't want you to know that many of its "low-fat" items have more than 500 calories. In fact, its low-fat chicken quesadillas have 742 calories and 90 grams of carbohydrates per order.
    July 2008 Update: Since Eat This, Not That called Applebee's out, its "low-fat" menu has disappeared. The chain does have a new eight-item Weight Watchers menu, however—all with fewer than 500 calories. The most caloric dish is the Tortilla Chicken Melt appetizer, at 480 calories. Okay, that's progress.
    3. IHOP
    ... doesn't want you to know that its Omelette Feast has 1,335 calories and 35 grams of saturated fat. By the time you finish eating this behemoth breakfast, you'll have consumed 150 percent of your daily fat requirement and 300 percent of your suggested cholesterol intake. Said IHOP's director of communications, "We do not maintain nutritional data on our menu items, so I am unable to assist you."
    July 2008 Update: Since Eat This, Not That hit bookstores, IHOP has discontinued the Omelette Feast. But . . . every other omelette at the New York location we snooped around in had more than 1,000 calories. The Garden Omelette contained the fewest calories (1,150), while the Big Steak Omelette had the most (1,490).

    4. Red Robin
    ... doesn't want you to know the nutritional impact of its gourmet burgers. "A gourmet burger starts by being an honest burger," Red Robin's Web site declares. So how come they've refused to provide calorie counts on any of their foods for so many years? And while we applaud them for finally giving up the data (after being pressured by us and others), why did it take so long in the first place? A quick glimpse of the numbers themselves might hold the answer: An A.1. Peppercorn Burger has 1,440 calories and 97 grams of fat, more than you would find in 32 strips of bacon! Add onion rings to that and you've just crossed the calamitous 2,000-calorie barrier, more than most people should eat in an entire day.
    July 2008 Update: Want to know what's in your favorite Red Robin burger? On the company's Web site, just click on . . . "Customize Your Burger." Hmm, could it be that Red Robin really would prefer that you stay in the dark? And good luck finding "Customize Your Burger." The quickest way we found it: Click the "About Us" tab, then on "FAQ" in the menu on the left. One of the frequently asked questions is "Does Red Robin offer nutritional information for its menu items?" Within the answer is the "Customize Your Burger" hyperlink. Finally, click the menu item you want, then the Nutrition tab on the far right. Thanks, Red Robin, for your . . . transparency.
    5. Hooter's
    ... doesn't want you to know anything about what's in its food. Although chains such as Chili's and Uno Chicago Grill divulge the hundreds of calories in their chicken wings, Hooters blames its nutritional-disclosure negligence on its expansive menu, which contains about 25 entrées: "Because of the millions of combinations available and our desire to frequently give you new menu options, it is impossible to provide accurate nutritional data," responded a PR representative.
    Our own investigation revealed that the chain's wing sauce (which consists primarily of butter, sweet cream, and partially hydrogenated margarine) also contains such unappetizing additives as maltodextrin, propylene glycol alginate, xanthan gum, calcium disodium EDTA, and potassium sorbate. (Not being able to tell what's natural and what's enhanced has always been a problem for us at Hooters.)
    July 2008 Update: Hooter's one New York location sheds light on the calories in its dishes, but the menus keep diners ingredient-ignorant. What's scarier about the wings—the horrifying ingredients we listed above, or the fact that just six Hooter's chicken wings have between 520 and 726 calories?
    6. Arby's
    ... doesn't want you to know that the FDA has no definition of "all natural." Thus, chains like Arby's can say they serve "100 percent all-natural chicken," despite using artificial flavoring. Even worse, the "all-natural" smoothies at chains across the country may contain high-fructose corn syrup.
    July 2008 Update: Since Eat This, Not That hit bookstores, Arby's has stopped advertising "all-natural" chicken. The assistant manager at the Emmaus, Pennsylvania, location told our reporter that he doesn't think the chicken is all-natural anymore. We wonder if it ever was.
    7. Fuddruckers
    ... doesn't want you to know the fat content of its 1-pound burgers. We contacted our local Fuddruckers restaurant and were told that the nutritional information was available on the chain's Web site (it's not). The corporate office later responded that providing such information would be "very extensive and timely." We're pretty sure he meant "very expensive and time-consuming." How's that for a Freudian slip?
    July 2008 Update: Fuddruckers is still hiding from us. It has no New York City location, and the company is mum, nutritionally, on its Web site.

    8. Dunkin' Donuts
    ... doesn't want you to know that each of its medium-size fruit-and-yogurt smoothies packs at least 60 grams of sugar-more than seven times the sugar in a chocolate-frosted cake doughnut. The fruit purees used in the smoothies are mixed with liberal doses of sugar and/or high-fructose corn syrup.
    July 2008 Update: Dunkin' Donuts allows full access to all its nutrition facts and ingredients online. But the smoothies are still sugar-loaded. Only the small Reduced Calorie Berry Smoothie has fewer than 60 grams of sugar, packing a not-so-modest 41 grams. Knowledge is power: Use the Dunkin' Donuts Web site to avoid sugar bombs like these!
    9. Papa John's
    ... doesn't want you to know that unlike rival chains such as Domino's, it has made little effort to introduce healthier options. A Papa John's representative admitted, "At this time, we have no additional regular menu items that are targeted toward eating lighter."
    July 2008 Update: Papa John's has finally disclosed all its nutritional information online, and has made small strides toward healthier options, such as the 100 percent whole grain wheat crust pizzas the company introduced in May. Now, if only Papa would toss a thin-crust version into the mix and stop serving sides like the mozzarella sticks, with more than 2,905 milligrams of sodium!
    10. Burger King
    ... doesn't want you to know that its French Toast Sticks (which deliver more than 4 grams of fat per stick) share a deep fryer with the pork sausage, Chicken Tenders, Chicken Fries, Big Fish patties, hash browns, onion rings, and Cheesy Tots-and that all of those items contain harmful trans fats. But there is hope: After the company was sued by the Center for Science in the Public Interest for moving too slowly to remove trans fats from its menu, Burger King promised to phase them out by the end of 2008.
    July 2008 Update: Burger King still has not eliminated trans fats. A large order of hash browns has an incredible—borderline criminal, really—13 grams of trans fat.
    11. Panera Bread
    ... doesn't want you to know that the synthetic food colorings in its pastries have been linked to irritability, restlessness, and sleep disturbances in children. And British researchers found that artificial food colorings and preservatives in the diets of 3-year-olds caused an increase in hyperactive behavior. (The same ingredients appear in fast-food items like mayonnaise, M&M Blizzards, and McDonald's shakes.) To its credit, Chipotle uses no artificial colorings or flavorings.
    July 2008 Update: On Panera's Web site, you can track down calories, fat, sugar, and other nutritional numbers. If you look hard enough you'll find ingredient lists, too—and note that a few items still contain artificial coloring. Disappointing.
    12. Chevy's Fresh Mex
    ... doesn't want you to know how its tortillas stack up nutritionally. The chain says it provides "nutritional information regarding calories, fat, protein & carbohydrates for some of our most popular items"-the chicken, steak, and shrimp fajitas, for example-on its Web site. But the numbers provided don't include an essential component: the tortilla.
    July 2008 Update: Chevy's still doesn't disclose the calorie count of its tortillas online. When we called a New York location, a server told us he couldn't find that info on the inhouse menu, either, which would seem to be a violation of the New York law. He did direct us to the same misleading nutritional information on the company's Web site. Gee, thanks.

    13. Maggiano's Little Italy
    ... doesn't want you to know just how many calories and carbs you're consuming in those massive pasta portions. (As the menu puts it, "Family-style service or individual entrees are available ... Whichever you choose, you'll have plenty to share or take home.") In Italy, a standard pasta serving means 4 ounces of noodles with a few tablespoons of sauce. At Maggiano's, a large order of pasta translates into 2 pounds of noodles piled high on a hubcap-size dinner plate (15-1/2 inches in diameter). A Maggiano's PR rep responded to our request for nutritional information a week later: "Sorry for the delay, I had to wait for corporate's approval. Unfortunately, they have declined to participate."
    July 2008 Update: With no New York City locations, Maggiano's is still hiding from us—and you. But we're still watching.
    14. T.G.I. Friday's
    ... doesn't want you to know how little nutritional info it provides. A Friday's PR rep told us that the chain makes the data available for only its "low-fat" dishes-those coming in under 500 calories and 10 grams of fat. Ah, hello, that's three items on the entire menu.
    July 2008 Update: When T.G.I. Friday's was forced to comply with the New York law, we realized why it had been hiding. The menu is riddled with fat traps like the Pecan Crusted Chicken Salad, which is an outrageous 1,360 calories.
    15. Baskin-Robbins
    ... doesn't want you to know that, unlike Jamba Juice's all-fruit smoothies, the top four ingredients in its Blue Raspberry Fruit Blast are Sierra Mist soda, water, sugar, and corn syrup.
    July 2008 Update: Since Eat This, Not That called the company out, Baskin Robbins discontinued the Blue Raspberry Fruit Blast. It also began listing all nutrition and ingredient information online. We call that progress.
    16. Sit-down chains
    ... don't want you to know that their food is actually considerably worse for you than the often-maligned fast-food fare. In fact, our menu analysis of 24 national chains revealed that the average entree at a sit-down restaurant contains 867 calories, compared with 522 calories in the average fast-food entree. And that's before appetizers, sides, or desserts-selections that can easily double your total calorie intake.
    July 2008 Update: It's still diner beware out there. The good news is that a handful of other municipalities are considering legislation similar to New York City's. We won't be satisfied until there's complete transparency in the restaurant industry. That day will come, we're sure of it. Why? Because we won't stop snooping until it does.
    You can also check out Eat This, Not That on MSN Shopping.

    And introducing: Eat This, Not That For Kids. Pre-order today on MSN Shopping.


    Provided by Men's Health
    URL: http://health.msn.com/nutrition/articlepage.aspx?cp-documentid=100187534>1=31036

  2. #2
    Elite Member Rondette's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Between uncertainty and acceptance
    Posts
    4,544

    Default

    Sure 'tis a tough time for chain food outlets! I think out of that list I've only eaten at Burger King, manly because I live in the UK and none of the others exist here. And it's been years!

    That fructose corn syrup is used everywhere in the states, huh?

  3. #3
    La vie en rose DitaPage*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    37,547

    Default

    The only one i'm familiar with on that list is Baskin Robbins.

  4. #4
    Elite Member sputnik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    fellow traveller
    Posts
    52,305

    Default

    i don't eat at chains. if i want fast food, i go to my neighbourhood kebab place. it's so much better than any of these places, at least the ones that i've tried. a lot of them i've never even heard of.
    I'm open to everything. When you start to criticise the times you live in, your time is over. - Karl Lagerfeld

  5. #5
    Elite Member McJag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    42,527

    Default

    I have this book & love it!
    I didn't start out to collect diamonds, but somehow they just kept piling up.-Mae West

  6. #6
    Elite Member LynnieD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    34,698

    Default

    Red Robin is horrendous. Been there once and I will never ever go back.

  7. #7
    Elite Member louiswinthorpe111's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Middle America
    Posts
    12,191

    Default

    I looked at this book at Target. It looked like it had a lot of information.

    Unfortunately, in middle America, all we have are chain restaurants. You def. have to check the calorie count. I LOVE the chicken quesadilla explosion salad from Chili's. I discovered I could eat KFC with chicken breast, mashed potatoes and everything and it was actually LESS in calories than that salad. I was crushed.

  8. #8
    Elite Member sprynkles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    At the salon
    Posts
    19,841

    Default

    We never do fast food anymore. And I will go
    local over a chain any day. But I expect the
    food I order to be naughty with calories and
    deliciously fattening. It's usually an occassional
    treat, not an everyday thing. No wonder all these
    folks eating out all the time are so damned fat.

    "A massive penis means never having to say you're sorry". Mo

  9. #9
    Elite Member holly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    the sunshine state
    Posts
    6,293

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sprynkles View Post
    We never do fast food anymore. And I will go
    local over a chain any day. But I expect the
    food I order to be naughty with calories and
    deliciously fattening. It's usually an occassional
    treat, not an everyday thing. No wonder all these
    folks eating out all the time are so damned fat.
    Exactly!

  10. #10
    Elite Member Sweetie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Den of the roving cunty bitches
    Posts
    24,533

    Default

    I love the Outbacks Alice Spring's Chicken. It is SO good.

  11. #11
    Hit By Ban Bus! Lily's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Everywhere and nowhere.
    Posts
    9,439

    Default

    I don't do fast food. Except once a month, I will go to Wendy's and have a chicken sandwich.

    I don't understand how people can eat like this on a regular basis.

  12. #12
    Elite Member Laurent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Out There
    Posts
    38,799

    Default

    I know someone who eats at least 2 meals every day - sometimes probably 3 - from a fast food bag or restaurant. They look about the way you'd imagine. I asked her if she'd like to join my gym with me, since she'd be talking about trying to straighten out her weight issues. The response? The $45 a month membership fee was too much. She spends no telling what on eating out every month. Probably enough to pay for a whole year of gym membership.
    “What are you looking at, sugar-tits?” - Mel Gibson

  13. #13
    Gold Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,483

    Default

    I think it's my right as a consumer to know what I'm eating.

    These days I rarely eat out without knowing the caloric/fat/salt content of the dish. Most Mexican restaurants do not share that info (probably because Mexican food is shockingly high in all three) so when I do have Tex Mex it's almost always the only meal I have that day, since it delivers as many calories in 1 meal as I need in 1 day. That's the only exception though.

    I have stopped eating at most restaurants that don't publish nutritional data.

  14. #14
    Elite Member McJag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    42,527

    Default

    I used to love the black bean burger at Chilies. Thought it was safe but OH NO! Over 800 calories. That book is great!
    I didn't start out to collect diamonds, but somehow they just kept piling up.-Mae West

  15. #15
    Gold Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,483

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by McJag View Post
    I used to love the black bean burger at Chilies. Thought it was safe but OH NO! Over 800 calories. That book is great!
    The guiltless chicken platter at Chili's would be perfect if it didn't have so much salt in it. It has over 100% of your sodium for the day!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: June 18th, 2007, 12:48 PM
  2. EPA to let industry pollute the air with lead as much as they want
    By Grimmlok in forum U.S. Politics and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: December 7th, 2006, 10:22 AM
  3. Paul Simon says music industry all about image now
    By twitchy in forum Music and Music Videos
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: May 28th, 2006, 02:39 AM
  4. 'Industry of Death' Museum Opens
    By Elvira in forum Gossip Archive
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: December 21st, 2005, 02:20 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •