Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Seafood benefits outweigh risks, government says

  1. #1
    Elite Member Sojiita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Central Duh-hio

    Thumbs up Seafood benefits outweigh risks, government says

    Seafood benefits outweigh risks, government says
    POSTED: 1:04 p.m. EDT, October 17, 2006

    WASHINGTON (AP) -- Eating seafood twice a week is good for your heart and generally outweighs the risk of exposure to mercury and other dangerous contaminants, the Institute of Medicine said Tuesday.

    Even so, the government needs to help consumers figure out which seafood is safer, an Institute report said.

    "The confusion may have scared people out of eating something that is beneficial for them and maybe for their offspring," said Jose Ordovas, a Tufts University researcher and member of the report committee.

    "Our goal was to put both things in perspective and see where is the balance," Ordovas said.

    The findings from the Institute, which advises the government on health policy, are in line with widely accepted government advice that eating fish and shellfish may reduce people's risk of developing heart disease, the leading cause of death in the United States.

    Interestingly, researchers said it's unclear how eating fish fights heart disease. It may be that beneficial omega-3 fatty acids offer some protection. Or the answer may be simpler, that people eat less saturated fat and cholesterol when they choose leaner seafood instead of fatty cuts of meat.

    Americans generally eat too much saturated fat and cholesterol and too little of the good omega-3 fatty acids, the report said. And evidence shows that eating seafood rich in omega-3s can contribute to vision and cognitive development in babies and help expecting moms carry babies to term, researchers said.

    The Tuna Foundation and other industry groups issued a statement saying the report tells consumers not to let fears of mercury exposure stop them from enjoying the nutritional benefits of regular fish consumption.

    Critics said the report will only worsen confusion about which people should avoid which fish.

    Environmental and conservation groups said it should have listed "good fish" and "bad fish," which the researchers said would be too difficult.

    Seafood is the main source of people's exposure to methylmercury, which is linked to learning disabilities and developmental delays in children and to heart, nervous system and kidney damage in adults.

    "This report is not balanced, and it's taken on more of an advocacy role, rather than a balanced presentation of facts," said Gerald Leape of the National Environmental Trust. "It's a real disservice to consumers."

    Critics were also alarmed the report offers the same guidance for pregnant women as for young children.

    "They seem to be unaware that children are smaller than adults," said Jean Halloran, director of food safety at Consumers Union, which publishes Consumer Reports magazine. "That advice, which they have featured prominently, could result in young children getting excessive doses of mercury."

    For pregnant women and children younger than 12, the report said:

    They may benefit from eating seafood, especially seafood with higher amounts of omega-3 fatty acids.

    They may eat six to 12 ounces of seafood a week. That can include up to six ounces of albacore tuna.

    They should avoid big predatory fish such as shark, swordfish, tilefish or king mackerel, which have higher mercury levels.

    For healthy teenagers and adults and those at risk of heart disease, the report said eating seafood may reduce the risk of heart disease. And if people eat more than two servings of seafood a week, they should be sure to eat different kinds of seafood to reduce the risk of exposure to contaminants, the report said.

    While the report does not list "good" or "bad" fish, it does describe broad categories

    Fatty fish such as salmon have the highest omega-3 levels but also have more saturated fat and cholesterol and can have higher levels of dioxin and PCBs. They tend to have less mercury.

    Shellfish and crustaceans are low in saturated fat but can have moderate amounts of cholesterol and present the greatest risk of microbial infection if eaten raw.

    In all seafood, levels of dioxin, PCBs and other contaminants do not pose health risks when eaten in government-recommended amounts
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- for seafood!! And what child is going to eat an excess of seafood? Dont most kids dislike seafood? Isn't that why they invented get kids to eat fish? I think the alarmists have gone a little over the top. Seafood is good and tasty! Yum lobster, crab, tuna, cod!!!
    Don't slap me, cause I'm not in the mood!

  2. #2
    Hit By Ban Bus! pacific breeze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    in the wild blue yonder


    Everything in moderation. Common sense seems to be in such SHORT supply these days.

  3. #3
    Elite Member moomies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    pretending to be a lurker but I'm not quiet enough


    I have a question. Anyone know if it's better to eat farmed salmon or wild salmon?

    If you think it's crazy, you ain't seen a thing. Just wait until we're goin down in flames.

  4. #4
    Hit By Ban Bus! pacific breeze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    in the wild blue yonder


    Always wild, although the fish farms are contaminating them with sea lice, too.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Seafood
    By SammysMom in forum Food and Cuisine
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: December 4th, 2006, 05:57 PM
  2. Benefits of cranberries
    By Laurent in forum Food and Cuisine
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: November 21st, 2006, 02:02 PM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: August 29th, 2006, 08:07 PM
  4. Report: Women misled on abortion risks
    By AliceInWonderland in forum News
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: July 19th, 2006, 10:21 AM
  5. Walmart? Health benefits? You're fired!
    By ourmaninBusan in forum News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 23rd, 2006, 12:31 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts