August 28th, 2008, 11:42 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wisconsin, United States
Posts: 9,929
|
gofugyourself

|
|
|
August 29th, 2008, 02:06 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lake Tahoe NV and Acapulco, Mexico
Posts: 1,165
|
 I just think the location of that big "blossom" is pretty funny. Too bad there aren't little buds centered on her breasts, too.
__________________
|
|
|
August 29th, 2008, 02:07 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wisconsin, United States
Posts: 9,929
|
this dress is . . . I don't know what the word is. I just can't believe she would chose to wear this.
|
|
|
August 29th, 2008, 02:07 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Burning Down Your Windmill
Posts: 14,820
|
I actually rather like it, she needs higher heels for a skirt that length, though.
__________________
So........ you're saying that Froot Loops don't contain real froot? - Twitchy2.0
When the pants go back on, I'm wearing those motherfuckers. - Mel1973
Girl, you have way too many issues to keep up with - DeChayz
|
|
|
August 29th, 2008, 02:51 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Penske material!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Great North West
Posts: 6,186
|
I don't hate it. I'd like it much more without the
roses painted on. But it's kind of cool.
__________________
I almost didn't recognize her without the aggressive camel toe ~ LAURENT
|
|
|
August 29th, 2008, 04:53 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: fellow traveller
Posts: 19,004
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by greysfang
I actually rather like it, she needs higher heels for a skirt that length, though.
|
i like it too. surprisingly. usually i'm not one for flowers and ruffles but this is quirky rather than pageant-y or promish so i like.
the shoes suck though, i agree the heels should be higher.
__________________
ni dieu ni maître
*Don't you know there ain't no Devil, there's just God when he's drunk*
|
|
|
August 29th, 2008, 08:27 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,865
|
I don't like it, but I would find it tolerable if it didn't have that stupid ruffle at the bottom.
|
|
|
August 29th, 2008, 08:45 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Friend of Gossip Rocks!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In a lecture theatre near YOU!
Posts: 18,686
|
^^ Ditto. If you can imagine the dress without the hideous ruffle it wouldn't be TOO bad I guess.
__________________
stopp fucking talkin bout michael jackson you azz h0le! bitch ghet a fucknn lyfe bitch!
|
|
|
August 29th, 2008, 09:32 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: My world! Restricted Area!
Posts: 11,468
|
Take of the iron on flowers and cut the lampshade off the bottom and I would like it.
__________________
|
|
|
August 29th, 2008, 05:51 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,513
|
She's damn ugly and so is the dress.
|
|
|
August 30th, 2008, 10:48 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,625
|
Guys, she needs that ruffle. It's where her torso ends.
I actually love this look on her though agree she needs higher heels for the just-above-the-knee cut. Her hair is a wonderful color, she has a great non-orangey tan and for once does not look uncomfortable in her own skin
__________________
"Give me your love and I'll give you--the Perfect Love Song!"
|
|
|
August 30th, 2008, 11:56 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,594
|
I don't love it but she wears it well. It reminds me of an ornate glass lampshade.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 AM.
|