April 7th, 2009, 01:29 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: England
Posts: 26,758
|
__________________
"Come the fuck in or fuck the fuck off"
|
|
|
April 7th, 2009, 01:53 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,739
|
Fug everything.
|
|
|
April 7th, 2009, 07:36 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Aaron Eckhart's chin dimple
Posts: 4,253
|
The brolly is cute...
__________________
Loved NYC!! Impressed with subway navigation skills! 
|
|
|
April 7th, 2009, 04:56 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Over the hills and far away
Posts: 18,214
|
I like her umbrella.
__________________

And who knows which is which and who is who.
Up and down.
But in the end it's only round and round.
|
|
|
April 7th, 2009, 05:04 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: in Hell. I drove the bus here.
Posts: 23,215
|
instead of splotching out her sons face, why dont they do it to hers?
__________________
If you see me in a Megan Fox thread, please proceed to beat the everloving shit out of me.
|
|
|
April 7th, 2009, 05:44 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Vincit qui se vincit
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 34,659
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dangerous
Fug everything.
|
i couldn't agree more.
|
|
|
April 7th, 2009, 06:04 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,331
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penny Lane
I like her umbrella.
|
me too.
|
|
|
April 7th, 2009, 07:52 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,693
|
Yes, fug all around
|
|
|
April 7th, 2009, 08:19 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Indahood, AL
Posts: 1,648
|
Why did they pixel out her kid's face? It's not like nobody's ever seen a picture of him.
I thought the Michelin Man coats went out of style in the '90s. That whole ensemble is a catastrophe...especially with the baby-shit green galoshes. I don't care if it's raining! Baby-shit green is still a no-no for galoshes!
|
|
|
April 7th, 2009, 08:22 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 13,766
|
I thought it's a british press rule to not publish the faces of celeb kids in paparazzi candids. Probably something to do with not obtaining parental consent?
|
|
|
April 7th, 2009, 08:28 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Indahood, AL
Posts: 1,648
|
Ah ok, I did not know that. But still.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 PM.
|