Page 1 of 13 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 193
Like Tree3Likes

Thread: Family cleared in JonBenet Ramsey's death

  1. #1
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    4,071

    Default Family cleared in JonBenet Ramsey's death

    Family cleared in JonBenet Ramsey‚€™s death - Crime & courts - MSNBC.com

    DENVER - Newly discovered DNA evidence in the notorious JonBenet Ramsey murder case does not match any Ramsey family members or anyone in law enforcement DNA databases, NBC affiliate KUSA reported Wednesday.

    The discovery, from a new testing method, prompted the Boulder district attorney’s office to release a letter officially clearing the Ramsey family, including John, Patsy and their immediate relatives, of any involvement in the December 1996 death of 6-year-old JonBenet.

    John and Patsy Ramsey, who died in 2006, had been the subject of intense suspicion in the disappearance of their daughter, a beauty queen whose innocent face smiled out at Americans in countless news reports for a dozen years.

    But in a letter to John Ramsey, Boulder District Attorney Mary Lacy, who met with Ramsey and his defense attorneys Wednesday morning, declared that “we do not consider your immediate family, including you, John, your wife, Patsy, and your son, Burke Ramsey, to be under any suspicion in the commission of this crime.”

    “I wish we could have done so before Mrs. Ramsey died,” Lacy wrote, adding: “We intend in the future to treat you as the victims of this crime, with the sympathy due you because of the horrific loss you suffered.”

    In a separate statement, Lacy offered her “deepest apology” for the family’s ordeal.

    “In a highly publicized case, the detrimental impact of publicity and suspicion on people’s lives can be extreme,” she said. “The suspicions about the Ramseys in this case created an ongoing living hell for the Ramsey family and their friends, which added to their suffering from the unexplained and devastating loss of JonBenet.”


    Family welcomes exoneration
    In an interview with KUSA, John Ramsey said he was “grateful that they acknowledge that we, based on that, certainly could not have been involved.”

    “But the most important thing is that we now have very, very solid evidence — and that’s always been my hope, at least in the recent past — that would lead us to the killer eventually,” Ramsey said.

    For years after the slaying, checkout-aisle tabloids and crime shows went after the couple. News reports cast suspicion on JonBenet’s older brother, Burke. Boulder police investigating the murder said the parents were under an “umbrella of suspicion.”

    Lacy has previously expressed doubts that the parents were involved. In 2003, a federal judge handling a defamation lawsuit in Atlanta involving the Ramseys said evidence in the case was more consistent with the theory that an intruder killed JonBenet, not her parents, and Lacy said she agreed.

    Less than two months after Patsy Ramsey died, the case appeared to blow wide open with the arrest in Thailand of John Mark Karr, a sometime teacher obsessed with the little girl’s slaying. Karr made bizarre, detailed confessions to the killing, but authorities said DNA evidence showed Karr did not commit the crime.

    Ramsey blamed the news media for fixating on his family, saying, “It became an entertainment event for the media, sadly. It boosted ratings, attracted viewers, to develop that controversy.”

    He called for more coverage of the “2,000 children murdered in our country every year.”

    Patsy Ramsey’s sister, Pam Paugh, said the exoneration was “a long time in coming and a very pleasant gift.”

    The letter means “we have a killer on the loose,” Paugh said in an interview with MSNBC. “That killer remains at large.

    “In the long run, we have to say [that] whoever did this to JonBenet, if they do not receive earthly justice, than clearly they are going to receive an afterlife justice that is not going to be pretty."

    12 years of harsh scrutiny
    Lacy based her decision, according to the letter, on the results of new DNA samples secured and tested at Bode Technology Group in Lorton, Va. The DNA technology, called “touch” analysis, was not available in 1996.

    The recent testing was conducted on a different area of the girl's clothing, and it matches previous DNA tested from the child’s panties in 1997.


    “That genetic profile belongs to a male and does not belong to anyone in the Ramsey family,” the district attorney’s office said in a statement. “The unexplained third party DNA on the clothing of the victim is very significant and powerful evidence.”

    John Ramsey found his daughter's body in the family home in Boulder on Dec. 26, 1996, in a rarely used room in the basement.

    According to Boulder police reports, the family got up early the day after Christmas to fly to Charlevoix, Mich., to visit family.

    Patsy Ramsey found a ransom note at the bottom of a spiral staircase about 5:30 or 6 that morning. Police were called and searched the home, but JonBenet's body was not found until another search of the home was conducted five hours later by John Ramsey.

    In April 1997, Boulder County District Attorney Alex Hunter declared the family under an “umbrella of suspicion.”

    Nine years later, in June 2006, Patsy Ramsey died after a 13-year battle with ovarian cancer.


    New evidence
    Boulder DA investigators and Lacy made the decision late last year to have the leggings of JonBenet’s panties tested at the Bode Lab. It is not clear if the leggings had been previously tested for DNA.

    The investigators considered the possibility that since JonBenet was sexually assaulted and undressed and redressed, it was possible that the perpetrator left skin cell samples on the waistband of the leggings.

    The Bode Lab recovered DNA from the top part of the leggings, on both the right and left legs, where the perpetrator would have put his hands to move them. Those new “touch” samples from the leggings match the DNA that was found in 1997 on the panties.

    At the time of JonBenet’s death, technology for DNA testing on the child’s panties used swabs from fluid obtained from skin and clothing to establish DNA identity.


    The previous 1997 DNA swab testing of the child’s panties found DNA in two separate areas. The 1997 DNA contained enough information or DNA markers to be entered into the federal DNA database called CODIS.

    The new touch DNA from JonBenet has been compared with what exists in CODIS, but no match has been found.

  2. #2
    Hit By Ban Bus!
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    squirrels in the morning, squirrels in the evening, squirrels at suppertime!
    Posts
    1,243

    Default

    Did anyone test Mr Tim or one of the creepy H/M guys from the pageant circuit yet? Joking, of course... well sort of.

  3. #3
    Elite Member Icepik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,516

    Default

    1996?? Wow.. I would have never guessed 12 years have passed since her murder.

  4. #4
    KD
    KD is offline
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,462

    Default

    I wish this would have come out before Patsy's death. I hope they find whoever did this.

  5. #5
    Elite Member viggofan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,751

    Default

    ^^ I agree.
    YOU CAN'T ALWAYS GET WHAT YOU WANT
    (M. Jagger/K. Richards)

  6. #6
    Elite Member McJag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    42,527

    Default

    I never thought they did it-now some jerk is still running around free. His DNA not in the database. Sad part is,you know he did it before her and after her and he is loose.
    I didn't start out to collect diamonds, but somehow they just kept piling up.-Mae West

  7. #7
    Elite Member january's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    7,255

    Default

    I still believe that the family was involved, in my mind there is very very little doubt. That crime scene was so contaminated by all of the people traipsing about, from her father "accidentally discovering" her body after all of these people had been in and out of the house, and then drudging the body all the way upstairs, messing up all the critical evidence. There were tons of people about, not limited to just law enforcement. I don't put any stock in the DNA evidence because it was so contaminated - the whole crime scene was.

    There was way, way too much circumstantial evidence to dismiss her family as not involved.
    Women ain't gonna let a thing like sense fuck up their argument. - Chris Rock

  8. #8
    Bronze Member ~Fresh 2 Death~'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    dirty south
    Posts
    8

    Default

    All these years later and their clear...something was fishy throughout the entire investigation... then we had the crazy guy that said he did it and then didn't....R.I.P
    ~momma said be careful who ya friendz they can be enimies within~

  9. #9
    Mistress of Dick All Elvira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,965

    Default

    I thought they were innocent. Glad to hear that they have been cleared. It's
    disgusting that some even blamed JonBenet's brother Burke.

  10. #10
    La vie en rose DitaPage*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    37,547

    Default

    Yeah, i still don't believe it. I don't believe John was invovled as much as Patsy was anyway. She's dead, so not much can be done. THE HANDWRITING ON THE RANSOM NOTE WAS HERS!
    If the Ramseys were poor, they would've been handcuffed in a second. This is NEVER getting solved, money has been laid out. The end.

  11. #11
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,625

    Default

    ^^I feel kind of bad saying it but I feel the same way.
    "Give me your love and I'll give you--the Perfect Love Song!"

  12. #12
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,540

    Default

    I agree. There were 3 handwriting samples taken and they all were close enough to Mama's as to be not able to be eliminated as her's. And that whole pagent/control/vicarious living issue....

  13. #13
    Elite Member Beeyotch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    26,525

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by january View Post
    I still believe that the family was involved, in my mind there is very very little doubt. That crime scene was so contaminated by all of the people traipsing about, from her father "accidentally discovering" her body after all of these people had been in and out of the house, and then drudging the body all the way upstairs, messing up all the critical evidence. There were tons of people about, not limited to just law enforcement. I don't put any stock in the DNA evidence because it was so contaminated - the whole crime scene was.

    There was way, way too much circumstantial evidence to dismiss her family as not involved.
    I agree completely. This new DNA evidence is very new, and the whole scene was so compromised they can never really rule out anybody now. The whole thing still smells fishy, the family still doesn't look completely innocent imo. At the very least, they know something they aren't telling.

  14. #14
    Elite Member celeb_2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    13,468

    Default

    I agree also, this doesn't sound very convincing to me, someone got away scot free.

  15. #15
    Elite Member nwgirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    4,954

    Default

    Hmmm...I always thought they had something to do with her death. I wish they'd give more information about the type of fluid or bodly secretion or whatever they tested as well as where exactly both samples came from (i.e. inside her panties or clothing, etc.). That would make it more clear to me.
    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."

Page 1 of 13 1234511 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Doctors cleared in John Ritter wrongful death lawsuit
    By sharon_b in forum Latest Gossip
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: March 14th, 2008, 09:36 PM
  2. Suspect says JonBenet Ramsey death 'an accident'
    By aabbcc in forum Crime and Punishment
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: August 17th, 2006, 12:36 PM
  3. JonBenet Ramsey's mother dies
    By Palermo in forum Gossip Archive
    Replies: 77
    Last Post: June 30th, 2006, 05:32 PM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: April 16th, 2006, 12:37 AM
  5. Britney Spears cleared by family services
    By MaryJane in forum Gossip Archive
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: April 12th, 2006, 08:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •