Login to remove the ads!
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Philip Roth Wins Man Booker International Prize, Judge Quits In Dissent

  1. #1
    Elite Member witchcurlgirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Acerbia
    Posts
    27,912

    Default Philip Roth Wins Man Booker International Prize, Judge Quits In Dissent

    Judge withdraws over Philip Roth's Booker win

    Carmen Callil retires from panel after decision to give award to writer whose work she considers a case of 'Emperor's clothes'

    Author and publisher Carmen Callil has withdrawn from the judging panel of the Man Booker International prize over its decision to honour Philip Roth with the 60,000 award. Dismissing the Pulitzer prize-winning author, Callil said that "he goes on and on and on about the same subject in almost every single book. It's as though he's sitting on your face and you can't breathe".

    One of three judges on the panel for the literary award, alongside rare book dealer and author Rick Gekoski, who acted as chair, and novelist Justin Cartwright, this morning Callil revealed that, after the decision was made to give the prize to Roth from a shortlist which also featured Philip Pullman, Anne Tyler and Marilynne Robinson, she decided to retire from the panel.

    "I don't rate him as a writer at all. I made it clear that I wouldn't have put him on the longlist, so I was amazed when he stayed there. He was the only one I didn't admire all the others were fine," said Callil, who will explain why she believes Roth is not a worthy winner in an outspoken column in the Guardian Review on Saturday 21 May. "Roth goes to the core of their [Cartwright and Gekoski's] beings. But he certainly doesn't go to the core of mine ... Emperor's clothes: in 20 years' time will anyone read him?"

    Founder of the feminist publishing house Virago, Callil is also the author of Bad Faith, a history of Vichy France. "I've judged many prizes before and I've rarely had my own favourite it's always a question of 'I think X is a genius and you don't, so let's go for Y'. That didn't happen," she said. "We should have discussed everything more, but Philip Roth came out like a thunderbolt, and I was too surprised. We took a couple of days to brood, and then I spoke to Justin and said I thought I should give in, if I didn't have to have anything to do with the winner. So I said I didn't want my name attached to it, and retired. You can't be asked to judge, and then not judge."

    Gekoski, speaking from the Sydney Writers' festival, said that the decision to give the prize to Roth had been reached "slowly and with a great deal of discussion and a considerable amount of argument".

    "Three is a very dangerous number, a hard number to come to a decision. Two people came in very, very strongly supporting one writer, and one not," he said. "Literary prizes are generally pretty contentious [and] you have to guard against satisfying the judges rather than picking the right author. Saying let's compromise nobody wants [this author] to win but we can live with it ... Well, my view is you want to get passionate support for someone."

    All three judges, said Gekoski, "felt very, very strongly about the reading, about the process, about who should win". "We have read our guts out for the last 18 months, so to do that and not come up with someone you can care about is a painful thing and not a desirable thing. I entirely understand that," he said. But, he went on, in a field that included Roth, "tell me who else we could have picked".

    "In 1959 he writes Goodbye, Columbus and it's a masterpiece, magnificent. Fifty-one years later he's 78 years old and he writes Nemesis and it is so wonderful, such a terrific novel ... Tell me one other writer who 50 years apart writes masterpieces," Gekoski said. "If you look at the trajectory of the average novel writer, there is a learning period, then a period of high achievement, then the talent runs out and in middle age they start slowly to decline. People say why aren't Martin [Amis] and Julian [Barnes] getting on the Booker prize shortlist, but that's what happens in middle age. Philip Roth, though, gets better and better in middle age. In the 1990s he was almost incapable of not writing a masterpiece The Human Stain, The Plot Against America, I Married a Communist. He was 65-70 years old, what the hell's he doing writing that well?"

    In her Guardian Review column, Callil also writes of her disappointment that the prize failed to celebrate writers in translation the shortlist also included the Chinese authors Wang Anyi and Su Tong, the Spanish Juan Goytisolo, Italian Dacia Maraini and Lebanese Amin Maalouf honouring instead "yet another North American writer".

    "Obviously [writers in translation] have a disadvantage and there's no sense pretending they don't, of being read in translation," said Gekoski. "They are disenfranchised in that way, [but] ask me who my favourite writers are and it's Flaubert and Dostoyevsky if the quality's there, it will shine through."
    The prize in his view, though, is "not about who's the best: I think that's fatuous". Instead, it's about honouring "achievement in fiction".

    "Are we saying Philip Roth is the best living novelist in the world? I don't know I want to say that. But he is the one we have chosen to honour and there are very good reasons for that," he said.


    Judge withdraws over Philip Roth's Booker win | Books | guardian.co.uk
    All of God's children are not beautiful. Most of God's children are, in fact, barely presentable.

  2. #2
    Elite Member CornFlakegrl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Hanging with the raisin girls
    Posts
    8,670

    Default

    I kind of agree that Roth writes the same story over and over (of the novels I've read), but now I want to read this one.

    And dayum, that judge is rough on "middle age" writers.

  3. #3
    Elite Member witchcurlgirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Acerbia
    Posts
    27,912

    Default

    I just read Nemesis- it was great, very powerful, sad. Although he didn't win the annual booker prize, this is the one for body of work.

    I like Roth, and yes, he writes on similar themes -the american jewish experience. Lots of writers have a theme, few do it as well as Roth. Some of his books are definite misses, but his good books are great and some of his books are masterpieces.
    All of God's children are not beautiful. Most of God's children are, in fact, barely presentable.

  4. #4
    Elite Member CornFlakegrl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Hanging with the raisin girls
    Posts
    8,670

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by witchcurlgirl View Post
    I just read Nemesis- it was great, very powerful, sad. Although he didn't win the annual booker prize, this is the one for body of work.

    I like Roth, and yes, he writes on similar themes -the american jewish experience. Lots of writers have a theme, few do it as well as Roth. Some of his books are definite misses, but his good books are great and some of his books are masterpieces.
    I like him, too. I kind of binged on him when I first discovered him and then lost interest because of the similar themes. I will definately give Nemisis a try.

  5. #5
    czb
    czb is offline
    Elite Member czb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    left coast
    Posts
    8,036

    Default

    wow this chick hates him. is she claire bloom's sister?

    i think he has written some good stuff and some mediocre books, too. yes, he has a recurrent them but i wouldn't say he "he goes on and on and on about the same subject in almost every single book."

  6. #6
    Elite Member witchcurlgirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Acerbia
    Posts
    27,912

    Default

    ^ She's her publisher . I swear, for Leaving A Doll's House.
    All of God's children are not beautiful. Most of God's children are, in fact, barely presentable.

  7. #7
    czb
    czb is offline
    Elite Member czb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    left coast
    Posts
    8,036

    Default

    ^^^ seriously??

    if that's the case, then she should have just removed herself from the committee for this year. no reason to completely resign. unless she wanted drama and more sales of claire's book.

  8. #8
    Bronze Member hunterlovesgossip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    East Coast
    Posts
    186

    Default

    I loved Sabbath's Theater.

  9. #9
    Elite Member McJag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    41,895

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CornFlakegrl View Post
    I kind of agree that Roth writes the same story over and over (of the novels I've read), but now I want to read this one.

    And dayum, that judge is rough on "middle age" writers.
    But how many 140 year old people do we know? Midle age is a stretch!
    I didn't start out to collect diamonds, but somehow they just kept piling up.-Mae West

  10. #10
    Elite Member sputnik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    fellow traveller
    Posts
    46,156

    Default

    bitter much?
    i understand if you don't like philip roth and if his books don't speak to you, but to say he's a bad writer? that's a bit much. he may not be to her taste but that doesn't mean he sucks.
    I'm open to everything. When you start to criticise the times you live in, your time is over. - Karl Lagerfeld

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. How does Philip Roth do it??
    By buttmunch in forum Books and Literature
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: November 14th, 2011, 07:21 AM
  2. A conversation with Philip Roth
    By buttmunch in forum Books and Literature
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 16th, 2010, 05:44 PM
  3. Anne Enright wins Booker prize
    By Honey in forum Books and Literature
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: October 18th, 2007, 10:02 AM
  4. Al Gore wins Nobel Peace Prize
    By sharon_b in forum News
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: October 14th, 2007, 07:09 AM
  5. Philip Roth honored by hometown
    By buttmunch in forum Books and Literature
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: October 27th, 2005, 04:50 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •