239Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With QuoteI didn't know he was dead.Originally Posted by Honeythorn
RIP.
Anyone could have access to this information. It doesn't even have to be someone famous. It could be a pool boy at some old diva's house. The Hmmm character reminds me of the way Cedric was ready to dish on Lisa on RHOBH because she kicked his ass to the curb. I'm sure this sort of gossip floats around Hollywood, maids, security guards, nanny's etc. Blind sites are a dream come true because they can't get busted for breaking confidentiality clauses. Think of Arnold and his housekeeper and their love child. No one knew about this? GMAB I'm sure just guests visiting could put two and two together. This doesn't have to be a famous person or really well connected person at all. Seriously just sounds like a junky who took notes when people were gossiping.
I didn't know he was dead.
i looked at the first part of this thread, i think it's pretty obvious its tom cruise and spielberg, the first movie was war of the worlds lines up with katie and tom starting to date during production etc...
what's the mystery? is there something else in that thread?
What happened to it, it just disappeared.
If i hear one more personal attack, i will type while drunk, then you can cry! - Bugdoll
(716): I'd call her a cunt, but she doesn't seem to have the depth or warmth
That moviemaker thread was largely discredited. For a start, the newspaper didn't exist. And although the original blind seemed pretty convincing, the story, as it developed (and became more frequent) became sillier and sillier and just - well - lost its own plot.
A successful man is one who makes more money than his wife can spend. A successful woman is one who can find such a man.(Lana Turner)
I hadn't heard that, discredited by whom?
If i hear one more personal attack, i will type while drunk, then you can cry! - Bugdoll
(716): I'd call her a cunt, but she doesn't seem to have the depth or warmth
I can't be bothered to look for it - sorry - but the way I remember it was that it split into two or three separate threads as the story developed. But as it began getting sillier, we found that the newspaper (was it called The London Times?) didn't exist, and some of the other details became increasingly questionable. Posters were beginning to doubt the whole story and it eventually died of malnutrition. But it was absolutely riveting when it first started.
A successful man is one who makes more money than his wife can spend. A successful woman is one who can find such a man.(Lana Turner)
re the TG situation :
-- the alleged letter to Tumbler to Cease and Desist :
see GRIFFITH Legal Notice
- now read this interesting old post april 25 2011 (not from CDAN) http://i39.tinypic.com/2ufd8rd.jpg
-- and now, the finale, see "enty" :A quick note about the nature of gossip.... | Facebook
Hope you can get through to the links.
That legal notice contains a typo:
and unnecessary yelling:As such your are hereby served notice that you are hosting and responsible for material and information which is false; legally actionable; and constitutes invasion of privacy, damage to me personally and professionally, as well as that which constitutes an immediate threat to the security of my family.
It's too bad the blogger folded so quickly, before TG's complaint really went anywhere, but I can understand wanting to avoid trouble. Except that whoever Himmmm is was the one leaving clues all over CDAN indicating that that was his identity, and the blogger was mostly just reposting Himmmm's posts.As the creator, administrator, author, host, publisher, and responsible party for your site/blog (and related posts, comments, and archives), I HEREBY DEMAND THAT YOU IMMEDIATELY REMOVE ANY AND ALL MENTIONS OF MY NAME, LIKENESS, ANY IDENTIFYING WORDS, MARKS, OR ABBREVIATIONS; any other comments, mentions, or statements relative to me personally, my career, geographic location, origin, home, business, or my family.
Get it together Us weekly. And that statement by “Kristen” um obviously wasn’t her. any fan, stan, stalker, kstew role player can tell right away that isn’t her. - a Twihard
Thank you for the links!
The comment from April 2011 has since been deleted. Good thing there's a screenshot!
I think TG is a pathological liar with delusions of grandeur.
Yes, he is. It's already been prven it's TG, and just him alone. Now he's sending threatning incoherent emails to anyone on the web talking about him or reposting his own incriminating posts. But the emails he send are just more proof it's him. The writing style and the details he can't help but give away confirm it.
Also on the CDAN FB page:
https://www.facebook.com/Crazy.Days....11296292219173I'm still thinking about that conversation with a guy from a famous named family, who constantly topped every bit of news, every little story, with one of his own. At the end I wanted to yell, "But no one in my family has ever been dragged out of Mexico by Dog The Bounty Hunter to stand trial!!"
The only person I can think of that fits is Andrew Luster.
Andrew Luster - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to the board!
"Creepy, like when Tom Cruise laughs." - Bloodhound Gang
"They can take our ignorance when they pry it from our cold dead minds." - Stephen Colbert
This thread is awesome! I joined up so I could chat about this whole bizarre Himmmm thing. I used to love reading Himmmm's comments on CDAN, but now I think he could be completely full of shit. I did a fair bit of sleuthing myself, some of which I shared elsewhere that I believe may be the source for a couple of comments here. You know, at first I didn't share the stuff I found because I thought it was wrong people were trying to unmask this source of awesome celeb dirt. But the more I found out, the less I found him credible... not to mention he crossed a line when he pretended to be RDJ and gave out Natasha Gregson Wagner's phone no. Himmmm made some very serious accusations about people committing morally repugnant and criminal behaviours, which many of us believed. I think we have a right to try to figure out if we can trust the source of these stories.
That is shady as fuck. That brings up a point I want to make about this:
And this "cellphone cam pic (lol)" is fake, if you google it you get the original photo of C.Cornell
And so on...
I searched myspace for that email address and found myspace.com/soulgoobahs. It seems to be a joke band with Griffith, Adam Levine, Brad Arnold (3 Doors Down) and 'honorary' member Chris Cornell. At first, I thought this lent credence to Himmmm/TG's claim he shares his email address with Brad Arnold and that Himmmm may be an account shared with a 'rock star' (either Levine, Arnold or Cornell)... but now, with everything that's come out - especially this photoshopped picture with Cornell - I think it's made-up fantasy. I mean really, is there a u2bono(at)gmail.com shared by Bono and a soundcheck guy? Come on.If you want to email me direct - you can at: 3doorBrad at gmail dot com...No, my last name isn't Arnold but we share email addys sometimes
Wow. Interesting find.
Hmmm, interesting. And cryptic. The 'session musician' part hints at TG again. The part about the famous mother and father sounds like it is meant to be the same person, but that doesn't add up. Not quite sure what he's trying to say.
I hope they put it back up. They could maybe just remove some of the posts with more personal details.
That legal notice looks like garbage to me. Nothing says you have a legitimate legal case like all caps. AFAIK, pretty much everything said at whoishimmmm about TG was public record. If TG was NOT Himmmm, then sure that part could be libel... problem is, Himmmm said a picture of TG was him. If Himmmm was lying, then TG's case is with CDAN first, whoishimmmm second. Yet the CDAN comments remain...
I am leaning toward this too. Certainly at least a fantasist, as lots of stuff shared on this thread indicates. That deleted comment from another blog is just weird. If he works for Legendary Pictures and could get in trouble for soliciting opinions, why a public comment? Why hint at the film company for most of the message, then come out and give its website? Just .... bizarre.
Ahem... The stuff in that seems farfetched and adds to my fantasist impression.
Can you point me to where he says that? I found reading that blog really hard work and couldn't take much in.
Boasting about using various writing styles? Hmmmmm.... perhaps he might want to work on that a bit. Check out this comment by 'The Head' that appeared on CDAN after someone posted the link to the legal notice. I am almost certain this is Himmmm. There are some obvious giveaways, and it reads like a very poor attempt to disguise someone's writing style and identity. There are some specifics that point to Himmmm which I'll detail later, but first I'm actually curious to hear what others make of it.
Last edited by Lightning's Girl; March 31st, 2012 at 06:52 AM.
Just wanted to comment on this:
I run into contractual and legal language all the time - contracts, warranty statements, specifications, and on and on. Using ALL CAPS in those documents is not considered "yelling". Rather, it means "especially pay attention to this". In this guy's paragraph above, he is capitalizing the specific, imperative statement that he is expecting the web site to act on.and unnecessary yelling:
Quote:
As the creator, administrator, author, host, publisher, and responsible party for your site/blog (and related posts, comments, and archives), I HEREBY DEMAND THAT YOU IMMEDIATELY REMOVE ANY AND ALL MENTIONS OF MY NAME, LIKENESS, ANY IDENTIFYING WORDS, MARKS, OR ABBREVIATIONS; any other comments, mentions, or statements relative to me personally, my career, geographic location, origin, home, business, or my family.
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks