Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: How safe are your cosmetics?

  1. #1
    Hit By Ban Bus!
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    support histiocytosis awareness
    Posts
    7,363

    Default How safe are your cosmetics?

    http://www.aolnews.com/nation/article/how-safe-are-your-cosmetics-safe-cosmetics-act-of-2010-wants-to-find-out/19562564

    (July 21) -- Most Americans use about 10 personal care products each day. The toothpaste, shampoo, deodorant, baby powder and other things that we routinely douse or slather on our bodies expose us to at least 100 different chemicals. Many of these, public health experts say, have been linked to adverse health effects like cancer, birth defects and learning disabilities.

    There is nothing that the Food and Drug Administration can legally do about it.

    But that may begin to change as two Democratic lawmakers -- Reps. Jan Schakowsky from Illinois and Edward Markey from Massachusetts -- introduced the Safe Cosmetics Act of 2010 today. If passed, it will be the first meaningful effort to give the FDA the teeth, tools and mandate to protect consumers from harmful products that are used by almost everyone.



    Under the current absence of oversight, it's legal for cosmetics companies to use virtually any ingredient with no pre-market safety assessment.

    This has bothered many of FDA's risk experts and toxicologists, who say they're eager to have the authority to delve into the litany of potentially hazardous chemicals in these products.

    "This law is absolutely needed and the authority it will give FDA is even more crucial now as many manufacturers are using nano-sized chemicals such as titanium dioxide in their cosmetic and health products," an FDA risk assessor told AOL News at the Institute of Food Technologists annual meeting in Chicago this week.

    Some of what the legislation calls for includes:

    • Ingredients linked to cancer and birth defects being phased out of personal care products.
    • Health-based safety standards for all ingredients in cosmetics that includes protections for children and other vulnerable populations.
    • Required listing on product labels of all chemical ingredients in personal care products, including fragrances and contaminants.
    • Worker access to information about hazardous chemicals they may encounter in the manufacturing of personal care products.
    • Adequate funding and support of the FDA Office of Cosmetics and Colors to pay for this oversight of the cosmetics industry.
    Few other details were available Tuesday night, when legislative staffers were still hammering out the final language .

    Many in the public health community hope that the legislation will prevent the cosmetic industry from hiding behind the overused and lobbyists-protected "confidential business information" exclusion, which has for decades allowed companies to refuse giving regulators information.

    "The industry insists it has to have the confidential business information rule, otherwise they [competitors] will know what is in our products," explained Stephenie Hendrick, environmental health media coordinator working with the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics and other groups.

    "The scientists at the companies already know what are in each others' products. It's only the public that's kept in the dark."

    The FDA is already conducting studies on some components of sunscreen.

    Paul Howard, director of the FDA's office of Scientific Coordination, told a room filled with attendees in a daylong conference on nanotechnology that the FDA is completing studies on the use of nano-sized titanium dioxide in sunscreens. For four weeks, pigs were slathered with sunscreen with differing sizes of nanoparticles.

    This is important because of controversy over the safety of titanium dioxide in many sunscreen and personal care products. He told the scientists that the preliminary studies showed the nanoparticles did not penetrate the skin deep enough to be harmful, but quickly added that more studies were being conducted.

    A Long Time Coming

    In 1938, Congress passed the Federal Food, Drugs and Cosmetics Act. Its provisions required new products to be shown safe before marketing. That pretty much never happened with cosmetics.

    "This legislation would create a system that people think already exists -- one that requires companies to assess chemicals for safety and disclose all the ingredients in their products," Stacy Malkan, co-founder of Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, told AOL News.

    "We all put these products on our bodies, and all of us are exposed to the toxic chemicals that are commonly found in cosmetics," she added, and cited the carcinogens formaldehyde and 1,4 dioxane, which are found in bath products and shampoos; phthalates in fragrances and the antibacterial agent triclosan.

    Triclosan, which has become ubiquitous in scores of health care products, has a link to dioxin derivatives. That has raised concerns in several peer-reviewed animal studies that showed it can be highly carcinogenic and can weaken the immune system, decrease fertility, damage sex hormones and cause miscarriage and birth defects.

    However, while the FDA says that triclosan is not currently known to be hazardous to humans, it nevertheless is doing studies on the health effects of the chemical. Its findings should be made public next spring.

    Consumers Believe FDA Is Their Protector

    Under the present law, FDA can't even begin to regulate cosmetics until they are already on store shelves, which means they can be sold to the pubic without safety testing of the product or its ingredients.

    "Most people assume the FDA regulates cosmetics the same way it does food and drugs to ensure they are safe. In reality, cosmetics are one of the least-regulated consumer products on the market today," said Janet Nudelman, program director of the Breast Cancer Fund.

    "When there are cancer-causing chemicals in baby shampoo and mercury in skin cream, you know the regulatory system is broken," she added

    The Environmental Working Group has been studying cosmetics for years, and everywhere it has looked it has found hazardous or untested cosmetics ingredients.

    Jane Houlihan, the group's vice president for research, said its testing has found that blood and urine samples from 20 teen girls from across the country were tainted with an average of 13 potential hormone-disrupting preservatives, plasticizers and other cosmetic chemicals.

    Also, in umbilical cord blood from 10 newborn babies, synthetic musk fragrances were found to have crossed the mother's placenta to pollute the baby's body before birth, she added.

    Houlihan called the proposed federal legislation "long overdue," saying it would finally close major gaps in the law, giving FDA real authority to ensure that personal care products sold in the U.S. meet a basic standard of safety.

    The feelings on Capitol Hill are that this legislation will pass without much opposition. That's mainly because the trade association, in a letter to lawmakers last week, said it "plans to support legislation that would strengthen and modernize regulatory oversight of the industry and create a greater role for the FDA in assessing ingredient safety for personal care products."

    That was seen as a smart move by the industry's Personal Care Products Council because the public is demanding more information on the safety of the products it uses.

    Congress is already up to its neck in reforming EPA's dangerously antiquated Toxic Substances Control Act. Food safety legislation is moving through both the House and Senate and parties on all sides of the cosmetic safety battle knew that FDA's responsibility for personal safety products would be under the congressional microscope next.

  2. #2
    Elite Member Tiny Pixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Near Paris
    Posts
    3,168

    Default

    Most of the stuff I use is made with organic elements ans do not contain potentially harmful chemicals.
    I insist on only using products which haven't been tested on animals (except for my shampoo and sunscreen) and somewhat they also tend to be better for mankind too.
    I'm a huge fan of Lush, their products are awesome
    Fluctuat nec mergitur
    Paris, Nov 13th


  3. #3
    Elite Member cupcake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Tampa Bay florida
    Posts
    4,804

    Default

    Im not much into makeup but I use natural products too. Im with you. I try to avoid as many chemicals as I can
    My grace is sufficient for you, for my my strength is made perfect in weakness...I love you dad!
    Rip Mom

  4. #4
    Elite Member Grimmlok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
    Posts
    55,372

    Default

    Lush products are laced with chemicals and man made shit.. no store smelling like that is natural.
    I am from the American CIA and I have a radio in my head. I am going to kill you.

  5. #5
    Elite Member burnt_toast's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    2,635

    Default

    Lush marketing is fantastic - but one good solid look at their Quantitative Ingredient lists and you'll find plenty of chemicals. I get easily irritated by companies 'selling' all natural and giving us shit again and again.

  6. #6
    Elite Member cupcake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Tampa Bay florida
    Posts
    4,804

    Default

    Ive never even heard of Lush
    My grace is sufficient for you, for my my strength is made perfect in weakness...I love you dad!
    Rip Mom

  7. #7
    Elite Member McJag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    42,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cupcake View Post
    Ive never even heard of Lush
    Thank you. I thought I was the only one!
    I didn't start out to collect diamonds, but somehow they just kept piling up.-Mae West

  8. #8
    Elite Member *DIVA!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    15,736

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmlok View Post
    Lush products are laced with chemicals and man made shit.. no store smelling like that is natural.
    That's what attracted me to them..

    Home - LUSH Fresh Handmade Cosmetics
    Baltimore O's ​Fan!

    I don''t know if she really fucked the board though. Maybe just put the tip in. -Mrs. Dark

  9. #9
    Elite Member Tiny Pixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Near Paris
    Posts
    3,168

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmlok View Post
    Lush products are laced with chemicals and man made shit.. no store smelling like that is natural.

    I make my soap myself with natural ingredients only, and it smells pretty good, without any chemicals.

    I'm not saying Lush products aren't made with chemicals, I can read and I've read their lists of ingredients.
    However, i used to use Chanel products before switching them for Lush, and I haven't yet find any other brand that uses so few chemicals to achieve efficient products.
    Furthermore, being a vegetarian, I like the fact that their products aren't tested on animals, and that some of their products are completely vegan.

    So I'm a bit sick of people saying "not it's not ENTIRELY natural etc", yes it's not, but it's a start, and it's still better than using products which contains no natural ingredient at all.

    I don't use anything chemical to wash my flat, or my clothes, and I'm sorry to say that sometimes, you do with the best you can, and as for now, Lush is the best I've found (skin-related products I mean)
    Fluctuat nec mergitur
    Paris, Nov 13th


  10. #10
    Elite Member cupcake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Tampa Bay florida
    Posts
    4,804

    Default

    I love Aubrey Organics and Kiss My Face. Been using those products for 20 plus years.
    My grace is sufficient for you, for my my strength is made perfect in weakness...I love you dad!
    Rip Mom

  11. #11
    Gold Member thunder&lightning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    996

    Default

    i wish i could find a good cosmetic that is hypo allergenic and waterproof at least for the eyes.
    another year i claim of total indifference.

  12. #12
    Elite Member bellini's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    6,595

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cupcake View Post
    I love Aubrey Organics and Kiss My Face. Been using those products for 20 plus years.
    I love Kiss My Face too. You can get some of their stuff at Trader Joe's.


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Cancer and cosmetics
    By twitchy in forum Beauty and Skincare
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: December 29th, 2008, 02:52 AM
  2. Lush Cosmetics
    By Sharlott in forum Products and Reviews
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: December 20th, 2008, 06:32 PM
  3. Benefit Cosmetics
    By Honey in forum Beauty and Skincare
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: June 10th, 2008, 09:07 AM
  4. Has anyone here used NYX cosmetics?
    By pacific breeze in forum Products and Reviews
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: November 26th, 2007, 03:18 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •