Quote:
Originally Posted by Bellatheball
Wait a minute. You gave me so much sh*t over my arguments and then you mention this little gem? Nice. So did you actually read any of my points or were you just happy to call me Sherlock? Hilarious!
|
What little "gem" would that be? What I said about my hubby's nips was in response to the bloody nipples comments. Just because she doesn't have bloody nipples doesn't mean she didn't run. And just because she didn't wear a bra doesn't mean she'd have bloody nipples. It's called a line of logic. Try to keep up.
I still think you're a Sherlock because of your statements that "no woman" could ever run a marathon without a bra and hence, that's why she couldn't have run it. That's got to be the most illogical conlsusion and train of thinking I've heard in a long time. And yes, I read everything you said. Not sure how my comment says otherwise.
The splits, now there is some actual "evidence" worth investigating. But even that doesn't "prove" anything. Come up with some pictures of her jumping into the route three miles before the finish line and then you'd have something.
But her not wearing a bra or that she wore jewelery or an mp3 player or whatever dumb ass shit has been said as "more proof" that she couldn't have run is just ridiculous.