Quote:
Originally Posted by Chilly Willy
^^ There's a difference between a burka and a spread eagle photograph of your little girl all over the internet.
If pedos can jerk off to anything, why is there child porn?
[b]Even in art there have to be limitations if it violates the rights of others.[b]
|
Well here is where we disagree-where to 'draw the line' so to speak. And the burqa thing was just making a point. At what point do you draw the line? Pedo's can jerk off to practically anything..just
given the choice and opportunity, of course they are going to go for what is more 'explicit' and is closer to what they want (sex with a child)..hence their desire for child porn. But again if what they really want is not available(kiddie porn, or worse yet, a real live child to abuse), then they will settle for the next best thing. The problem comes up when the 'next best thing' for the pedos is what a normal person(not EVERY normal person mind you) could consider to be 'art'.
If you keep banning things that can turn a pedo perv on..then where does it end? Eventually the 'next best thing' for the pervo ped will simply be a child in a bathing suit. What to do then, ban children in bathing suits? It would never end.
*this whole thing SUCKS cause it almost seems like I am defending the peds! WAAHHH!!
