View Single Post
Old September 28th, 2007, 08:32 AM   #82 (permalink)
yaruar
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 66
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mookie View Post
^^^exactly.

it also leads me to believe that the photog exploited this in the name of "art", but it looks to me like he's just a perv who is irresponsibly putting "art" out there that is calling forth all sorts of people. it pains me to imaginehow many people go see this type of "art" so they can get off on it. and THAT, is what gives it porn status in my book.
It's interesting that you assume it's a he, when Nan Goldin (the artist in question) is a woman and a very talented one at that.
yaruar is offline   Reply With Quote