Quote:
Originally Posted by southernbelle
I thought the article was really in poor taste. I can understand them wanting to call Britney out on her behavior, but reading this article made me really dislike OK. The entire time they praised themselves and made cheap, tacky references to money and their own skills and talent while tattling on Britney. This article was about 50% name dropping, 45% information that we already knew, 5% details expanding on what we already knew, 0% "revelation." There was absolutely nothing shocking about it.
I.
|
I totally agree, so lame. I noticed a few things
1) they said one of their staff ran after britney and had a discussion with her. so, why isnt the content of that convo in the article? I would think that would be the juciest part of all of this--what she said her reason for leaving was.
2) i noticed that it was mentioned that when britney was about to eat lunch in that dress, an OK! person told her not to. Leads me to assume the reason for britney wipeing her hands all over the dress afterward, bratty as it may be, was sort of a f*ck-you-scolding-me.
3) I also have to say, Im sure there are plenty of stories about other celebs about showing up to interviews late, bitching about the wardrobe, and being demanding. Thats why this article is disapointing--this could be about anyone.
4) As for the going to the bathroom with the door open, although i personally would never (hell i close the door even when im home alone=), i think thats pretty usual at photoshoots. Half the time youre naked and changing in front of everyone-nothing is sacred at those. Makeup artists powder your body all over, etc. Im not saying peeing infront of people is A-OK, but its not a scandal.