June 25th, 2009, 01:43 PM
|
#43 (permalink)
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 4,132
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aella
But when she gave the child up for adoption, it wasn't the case, right? Whatever the practice is now, it's a violation of her trust in the laws to apply it retroactively.
Why is this case even being argued?
|
Word.
__________________
The brain doesn't need blood. It just needs to be kept wet.
|
|
|