Well it was pointed out to me that even commenting on 'the viewers'(as in the people who watch the show, not board members) is even considered 'boards on boards' and that is why I got the warning. I do not see how the reaction of viewers of a television episode is NOT related to the show episode itself, especially when it is directed at all general viewers of the show, but whatever. It is board on boards and the warning is valid they say. I really honestly did not think that would have been boards on boards.
At least they did answer my question and I will give them credit for that.
I think the thing that bugs me the most about the modding their(and I understand how difficult modding can be and all)...is that the mods seem to really dislike the board members, or at least the ones who are not their pets and who may make a mistake. But damn you can moderate and not 'hate' while doing it. I have only gotten two other warnings there before (along time ago and they expired)..but even those warning were really just nasty as hell. You can tell someone what they did wrong without coming across like a mean asshole. In fact the warning messages themselves would have been gross violations of a number of board rules if the were posted messages themselves.
Plus I still see tons of grammatical and spelling errors..tons of them. Some from the same long time posters, over and over bad grammar, punctuation, misspelled words, etc., along with other violations like boards on boards stuff and personal remarks. How are these people skating by with this shit?
If there was consistency then there is no way those people would not have earned a ban yet.
__________________
.....
|