View Single Post
Old March 3rd, 2008, 12:19 PM   #13 (permalink)
Grimmlok
Elite Member
 
Grimmlok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In WhoreLand fucking your MOM
Posts: 45,180
Default

The UN also had its weapon inspectors in Iraq while retard Dubbya was building up his army outside the borders, and the inspectors repeatedly told him there were no weapons, plans for weapons, or the facilities for weapons.

Saddam WAS policed, he had no weapons, he had no capability of making any, and tha's what the UN told the US. That was their mandate. 2 "no fly zones" and continued weapons inspections. That's what they were doing.

The US ignored them and invaded anyway because, as we all know, the invasion was premised on a bunch of lies. Don't pawn off that bullshit on the UN. Despite the rest of the planet, and the weapons inspectors telling the US otherwise they went in anyway.

This ridiculous historical revisionism is starting to piss me off. It's like those idiots that sit there and tell you "Bush tried diplomacy, but it didn't work, so he had to invade!" which is absolute nonsense, considering Bush's "diplomacy" window was the time it took to build up hundreds of billions of US forces and equipment on the border staging area for invasion.

It wouldn't have mattered wtf Saddam said or did, or what the UN said or did, NOBODY MOVES HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF MEN AND EQUIPMENT FOR A WAR AND THEN SENDS THEM BACK HOME WITHOUT DOING ANYTHING.

Effing retarded
__________________
"I can't help it if their ego suffers bystander trauma from my vivisection of their argument"
Grimmlok is offline   Reply With Quote